• Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The last time this happened it was Japanese cars, and the US auto industry failed and got bailed out. I expect that to happen again with Chinese EVs.

    The ability to make cars involves a lot of skills that can have military applications. There’s a reason car factories were converted to build basically everything in WWII, and the US won’t give up that ability for national security reasons. So our auto industry can’t fail, and will be propped up by the government.

    • Uranium3006
      link
      fedilink
      286 months ago

      nationalize them and force EV product lines and then spin off as a worker co-op

      • DdCno1
        link
        fedilink
        226 months ago

        I have to wonder if people are serious with these absurd suggestions or what on Earth you are trying to achieve by writing this. This is about as realistic at demanding that America should build a second moon entirely out of cheese.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yeah, it’s so much better to just write checks to failing companies. Obama bailed out GM without any preconditions.

          What if instead the government took the equivalent amount of ownership and put them on the path to building EVs? GM could’ve been Tesla without the Musk issue. And the public shares could’ve either been kept by the government, sold on the market later on or turned over to the workers so they could have someone on the board.

          None of this is an outlandish phantasy, other countries did similar.

          • BombOmOm
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            What if instead the government took the equivalent amount of ownership and put them on the path to building EVs? GM could’ve been Tesla without the Musk issue.

            In 2009, $/kwh prices were astronomical. There is a reason the Model 3 didn’t exist until 2017. Trying to make that car back in 2009 would have been a catastrophically awful idea.

            You guys have to stop with these suicidal ideas.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              96 months ago

              The Tesla roadster was released in 2008, and electricity has always been cheaper than the equivalent in petrol.

              • DdCno1
                link
                fedilink
                56 months ago

                This user meant the price per kWh of battery capacity. The Tesla Roadster was little more than an expensive proof of concept that was vastly inferior compared to the Lotus Elise it was based on.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  And then the Model S came out, and while expensive was still a decent all round car. And I’m sure GM could’ve made it cheaper/better if they went that route.

                  I think you’re suggesting that I’m proposing that GM would have needed to stop building ICE cars and switching to electric overnight, instead of transitioning as technology and economics allowed instead of what they did now, which was ignore the whole thing until Tesla got successful and playing catch up, first to Tesla, now to BYD.

              • BombOmOm
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                The US government forcing GM to make a $100,000 luxury EV in 2008/9 would have been so laughably bad I can’t put it into words. And yes, the $/kwh of batteries was terrible then, why do you think EVs were so damn expensive in 2009?

          • Uranium3006
            link
            fedilink
            46 months ago

            Neoliberal brain can’t allow anything good to actually happen

        • BombOmOm
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yeah, that suggestion is hysterically nonviable for a plethora of reasons. Even joking about that would eviscerate the average politician. Not even just the average American politician, the average European politician would get wrecked for such a nonviable idea.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          What kind of cheese? Are private citizens allowed to go there and fill our pockets? Or is it government cheese and we wouldn’t want to

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      Absolutely they’ll get bailed out. They know they’re “too big to fail” and will make stupid short term decisions based on the fact that they won’t have to deal with their own nonsense further down the road.