• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    136 months ago

    Queer no longer means odd

    Yeah it does. It has additional meanings, but it also retains that one.

    literally now also means figuratively.

    Over my dead body! Just because an authority says something unacceptable is acceptable doesn’t make it so. See also: the Israeli government committing genocide.

    It is not antisemitic to be pro-Palestine

    Correct.

    if you ask anyone other than Netanyahu

    Frustratingly, he’s far from the only Zionist demagogue spreading that particular lie. It’s become less effective recently, but it’s been used to shut down any criticism of the apartheid regime for decades…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      literally now also means figuratively.

      Over my dead body! Just because an authority says something unacceptable is acceptable doesn’t make it so. See also: the Israeli government committing genocide.

      Maybe this isnt the right place to interject here: but yes, it now also means figuratively. Not because an authority said so, but because a sizable portion of native english speakers use it to mean figuratively. Thats how language works.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        That’s a textbook appeal to popularity fallacy. Just because many people make the same mistake doesn’t mean it becomes correct.

        The most popular electric car brand is Tesla. That doesn’t mean that Teslas don’t have the build quality of a 1980s Yugo and the price tag of a brand new Jaguar.

        Don’t use other people being stupid as an excuse to be stupid, is what I’m saying.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Nope, both descriptivism and prescriptivism have merit, depending on the specific case.

            A lot of people using a word as having the opposite meaning out of pure ignorance and/or carelessness is one case where prescriptivism is warranted.

            I’ll die on this fucking hill 😄

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              26 months ago

              And you will die on a linguistically untenable hill. Redefining words had happened throughout history and language hasnt died out and its not gotten worse.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                And you will die on a linguistically untenable hill

                Is this your way of warning me against going hiking in Wales? 😉

                language hasn’t died out

                Of course not. That’s literally impossible. Don’t be fatuous, Jeffrey.

                and its not gotten worse.

                That’s of mixed veracity at best.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          56 months ago

          This is a bad comparison. Language absolutely works as described in the previous comment. While certain trends such as using “literally” to mean “figuratively”, are personally super annoying, that doesn’t change the fact it’s 100% correct when enough people do it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          36 months ago

          The OED is, again, descriptive. They observe the change in meaning and update their description accordingly.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            Correct. You’ve just described how the language you’re using has come to be. It evolves over time, and the OED is the most respected documenter of that change. We don’t use the same English that was standard a century ago. Wheat is colloquial now is the standard.