• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    45 months ago

    literally now also means figuratively.

    Over my dead body! Just because an authority says something unacceptable is acceptable doesn’t make it so. See also: the Israeli government committing genocide.

    Maybe this isnt the right place to interject here: but yes, it now also means figuratively. Not because an authority said so, but because a sizable portion of native english speakers use it to mean figuratively. Thats how language works.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      That’s a textbook appeal to popularity fallacy. Just because many people make the same mistake doesn’t mean it becomes correct.

      The most popular electric car brand is Tesla. That doesn’t mean that Teslas don’t have the build quality of a 1980s Yugo and the price tag of a brand new Jaguar.

      Don’t use other people being stupid as an excuse to be stupid, is what I’m saying.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Nope, both descriptivism and prescriptivism have merit, depending on the specific case.

          A lot of people using a word as having the opposite meaning out of pure ignorance and/or carelessness is one case where prescriptivism is warranted.

          I’ll die on this fucking hill 😄

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            And you will die on a linguistically untenable hill. Redefining words had happened throughout history and language hasnt died out and its not gotten worse.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              25 months ago

              And you will die on a linguistically untenable hill

              Is this your way of warning me against going hiking in Wales? 😉

              language hasn’t died out

              Of course not. That’s literally impossible. Don’t be fatuous, Jeffrey.

              and its not gotten worse.

              That’s of mixed veracity at best.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        This is a bad comparison. Language absolutely works as described in the previous comment. While certain trends such as using “literally” to mean “figuratively”, are personally super annoying, that doesn’t change the fact it’s 100% correct when enough people do it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        The OED is, again, descriptive. They observe the change in meaning and update their description accordingly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          Correct. You’ve just described how the language you’re using has come to be. It evolves over time, and the OED is the most respected documenter of that change. We don’t use the same English that was standard a century ago. Wheat is colloquial now is the standard.