• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 month ago

    I like the idea, but I don’t like that everything is tied to a single account. If it’s compromised so are your emails, calendar, contacts, files, and passwords. But the service is good enough to replace Google, and choosing between the two, I’d choose Proton.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      Mail servers are the one thing I refuse to self host. Years of managing enterprise email taught me that I don’t need that kind of negativity in my life

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        I agree. I was thinking about using different services for different tasks instead of putting everything into the same basket. I’m not self-hosting an email server either.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      If you self-host all the same services you have the same exposure level if root on your hosting machine is compromised. I suppose it depends on how confident you feel in how agile you can patch if a vulnerability becomes known in postfix for example. I wouldn’t consider self hosting something that reduces your cybersecurity risk typically

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That’s true. But as we were speaking about an external service (Proton), I was thinking about diversification. I use Proton for emails, but I don’t use Proton Pass opting for another external password manager.

    • Lad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      I agree that it would be very bad if your Proton account got compromised with so much data tied to it. However, I’m personally comfortable with a strong password and 2FA for my Proton account.