• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    355 months ago

    It’s not even copyright laws, it’s everyone insisting on exclusive contracts. There’s no reason a piece of content couldn’t be on Netflix and Disney+ at the same time. It would be a lot better for consumers if streamers could compete on price and service instead of which content they managed to create/licence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      195 months ago

      Music streaming has proven this for years now, all the major brands have massive collections that make its super easy to pay and listen to just about anything.

      Early Netflix proved this when everything was readily available for an affordable pricre.

      • downhomechunk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        155 months ago

        Me in the 90s and 00s: yarrrr!

        Me in the 10s: it feels good to be legit

        Me in the 20s: YARRRRRRRRR!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        Yep, you choose between Spotify, Tidal, etc based on price and how well the app works, not because one service has the band you like while the other one doesn’t (not that music streaming isn’t its own shitshow for other reasons, of course).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        The situation is a lot better with music, but it’s not perfect. There’s still issues with region locking content, and content only existing on one service and not another.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 months ago

      Exactly. I like Netflix’s service, but Disney’s content. Why can’t I just pay for a Disney bundle on Netflix? Likewise with Max, Peacock, etc.

      Lawyers are why we can’t have nice things.