• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    There’s a bunch of old texts about a Jewish “prophet” called Jesus, who was gathering some followers. As far as I understand, there’s no really reason not to believe the person existed.

    Then again, all the Jesus lore, there’s no reason to believe his miracles were real as those made no sense and there’s no real proof besides those same texts written after Jesse’s death

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2511 days ago

      This. There is evidence that a preacher called Jesus existed, was crucified, and was well-regarded enough to start a following that persisted even after his death.

      There isn’t, however, strong historical evidence for any of the magical parts of it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          611 days ago

          Every Christian takes an historical proof of Jesus as affirmation of the stories within the New Testament.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            411 days ago

            Let’s not do the ‘every Christian’ thing. It’s worth remembering the US has a very ‘unique’ type of Christian.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          110 days ago

          Primary sources? No, but there are independent secondary sources by people with no skin in the game.

          Antiquities of the Jews by Josephus (circa 93–94 CE).

          Annals by Tacitus (circa 116 CE)

          The earliest Christian writings are also more about the teachings of a disruptive Jewish preacher who was then crucified, than they are about magic.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        110 days ago

        I remember that one miracle closely resembles CPR. He put his hands on a body and brought it back to life.