@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 5 months agoCursed wretched marketingmander.xyzmessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up1962
arrow-up1962imageCursed wretched marketingmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square125fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•5 months agoI wasn’t saying everyone was looking at the same image. I’m saying the optical illusion still works when using a single image.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•5 months agoSure but I never disputed that. I’m saying this effects are real and there was some confusion due to the above.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•5 months agoYou disputed that right here: It’s not accurate to say we were all looking at the same image with the dress. Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-25 months agoI’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?
I wasn’t saying everyone was looking at the same image. I’m saying the optical illusion still works when using a single image.
Sure but I never disputed that. I’m saying this effects are real and there was some confusion due to the above.
You disputed that right here:
Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
I’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?