• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    255 months ago

    Proportional representation without a referendum is the best way for parliament to do what’s necessary to fight against climate change.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      165 months ago

      Louder for those in the back!

      Proportional representation without a referendum is the best way for parliament to do what’s necessary to fight against climate change.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        175 months ago

        Yup, I’m done with arguing with bad faith Pierre Poilievre conservatives and corporate liberals about it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      35 months ago

      Unfortunately, many of the largest contributors to climate change don’t even have parliaments

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        However that is for their people to focus on.

        Canada isn’t nearly doing enough to address climate change and it’s time Canadians have at least 7 choices in each riding instead of 2. We deserve accountability.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        Because it allows the establishment figure heads and corporate media to fear monger people into staying with first-past-the-post when in reality proportional representation is simpler as it represents the popular share of mps by vote percentage. PR would fix the current polarization in our politics.

        • Iceblade
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          I’d actually lean towards the opposite for similar reasons. I think it’d be hard to get the current politicians to implement proportional representation without a referendum. The current system benefits them. Having a (successful) referendum would give the issue momentum that can keep it going through bureaucratic & political obstacles.