• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    814 months ago

    What first party solved the issue with PayPal? I literally want to see it burn but I don’t have an alternative.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        384 months ago

        Thank you for providing a different point of view, I didn’t realize things were so complicated in the united states. In the EU there is a system called iDEAL which iirc is maintained by a collaboration of different banks and lets you pay for stuff online instantly and with zero fee. For sending money person-to-person, there are apps like tikkie that are just a thin wrapper around iDEAL. And in cases where these things don’t work, you can just do a direct bank transfer by typing in the other person’s IBAN in your bank’s app/website. Slightly less convenient, but still nearly instant and zero fee.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          324 months ago

          Never heard of iDEAL. Wikipedia says its a a Dutch system that was acquired by the “European payments initiative” last year. The EPI just became active as a payment system 1 month ago.

          This is VERY much still in development and not at all an established system in the EU.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            94 months ago

            Not sure about the name of the systems, and I’ve seen them change names a lot over the years

            But I think it’s a pretty universal thing in the EU, that you’re able to pay directly using an IBAN, I’ve even seen “direct bank tranfer” in stores that sell across the EU

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            In Poland we have BLIK. It’s simple, you go to your bank app and generate code, then you write that code and money is transferred. Also you can send money to phone number. That’s very great system, with no fees.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          94 months ago

          Ideal is not the same, by any means, as PayPal. Read up.

          With ideal you loose your money. Ideal is made from the pov of the bank and the shop selling you stuff. Its almost impossible to claim your money back without the sellers consent.

          Tikkie is not the same as PayPal since tikkie only works with EU banks. (and quite possibly at this moment only NL banks) PayPal does not need a bank account. Its also not really a wrapper around ideal but thats another discussion. And mostly a semantic one so lets not go there.

          Effe wat meer moeite doen en de kleine lettertjes lezen medenedelander :)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          Actually, there’s a better one for Europe. The Payment Services Directive 2 (PSD2) is an EU directive to allow payments to be done through APIs exposed by the bank. It’s essentially a wrapper for a bank transfer. Most new payments companies are just unifying these APIs.

          Some counties do it better than others. The UK is very good (with the exception of starling bank). I remember Hungary being a pain.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          iDEAL sounds a lot like Bancontact/Payconic in Belgium.

          Which doesn’t do everything Paypal does either. Others have mentioned the buyer protection, but there’s also multiple payment methods you can link to it, subscription management, and one-click payments (where it also enters your address for shipping) - and crucially: available worldwide.

      • wildncrazyguy138
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think it’s that PayPal was one of the firsts to provide a method for collecting credit card transactions electronically.

        Before PayPal, you’d often have to visit a website, then call the phone number for the seller to collect payment.

        eBay needed paypal because their sellers were often not businesses, just people yardsaling stuff online.

        Coincidentally, I interned at a PayPal competitor in 1998 that went under during the bust. We had an electronic interface through MS access, but it was a still a human entering in the CC number into one of those dial pads on our side and then confirming the transaction. I’m sure with all of the concerns around security nowadays that you can understand why that was a terrible long term business model.

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            I deal with websites today that are optimized for PayPal first with worse second and third options.

            A lot of websites with third party vendors rely on PayPal since it is the cheapest account for a seller with international access and PayPal handles the fraud investigation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        in the US it’s still not easy to send money to another private individual via the banking system

        Bizarre

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        In Poland for online payments everyone uses Blik. It lets you generate six digit number in your banking app that you then give to the site you’re making payment to. Your banking app then asks you if you want to make the payment with information about how much you pay and to whom. You accept and you’re done, no card details were shared.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      184 months ago

      In the EU we have SEPA instant transfers

      For a global solution you’d want Wise or Revolut or something. Or PayPal, but the others have features PayPal doesn’t. But there are instances where PayPal wins.

      But all the different banking systems are still a mess sadly.

      • NickwithaC
        link
        fedilink
        English
        174 months ago

        Given that banks’ whole thing is transferring money you’d think they’d have got that sorted from the start but no.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          84 months ago

          My hypothesis on this is they just don’t want to facilitate moving money out of their bank to another one. Moving money between accounts held by the same bank is usually much easier. The major US banks are for-profit businesses, after all.

          Alternative hypothesis - US banks aren’t implementing new features because they’re mostly all still running on ancient IBM mainframes.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            64 months ago

            I’ve heard from people in banking and in health care that regulations around transferring money and health information have not at all caught up to modern technology in the US. They’re tedious and cumbersome, which means thing more more slowly and more haphazardly.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            My guess is no one is willing to take on the liability. Any new system that introduces bugs or introduces attack vectors from hackers don’t want to be responsible for any lost money and I’m sure banks/insurance don’t want to take on the risk either.

            Magnetic tape and clearing houses for the indefinite future!

    • fmstrat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      164 months ago

      Yea, this isn’t US focused. A person working here from the UK told me “They tell us when we go over to expect a nice modern society with a third-world banking system. Oh, and guns.”

        • Kairos
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          No? Is it? Isn’t Zelle just like a directory?

          Either way it’s owned by the banks. It is the first party solution.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              44 months ago

              Zelle actually got rid of its app and is now incorporated directly in the banking apps themselves. It’s kind of like a browser extension where it has its own section in the banking app

            • Kairos
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              I don’t know for sure. But I do know that Zelle is the banks’ collective response to venmo.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      What first party solved the issue with PayPal?

      iDEAL solved it for countries that participate. For countries that don’t, sadly there’s no good first party solution. Revolut and Transferwise are much better alternatives to paypal tho.

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        India also has very good and robust online payment infrastructure.

        It’s actually mind-boggling that USA hasn’t figures that one out, despite being saviour of capitalism.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            24 months ago

            In my case and some others, it’s because zelle has a hair-trigger fraud detection algorithm that has frequent false positives that cause huge headaches. It could be excellent but it’s just okay. No one trusts it with substantial sums of money.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Like you said in your initial comment,

        International money transfer (with currency exchange) But also I don’t want to give some random website my credit card

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      I’m guessing they’re referring to FedNow, which is supposed to be like zelle/venmo but backed by the fed.

      That being said it’s only starting to get rolled out and I have yet to see anyone else whose bank offers it.