• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    44 months ago

    is it a sexual urge (which is fine to have) or a thing that is seen as exclusively sexual (which is maybe problematic)?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I dont think anyone considers boobs as purely sexual. Due to their biological function they are also distinctly maternal, but within the context of sex i suppose they are considered erotic because full breasts biologically indicate good health, and the ability to successfully nurse children.

      Same reason we find nice hips attractive although it serves no immediate purpose within the context of sex. But they are also called child bearing hips for that reason; we find them attractive because they indicate a mate able to successfully give birth.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        I mean, the tits thing is a myth. I’ve seen women who were basically flat nurse children, and women with back problems on their chests have trouble. the actual amount of tissue required is very small, or something.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          Of course big boobs aren’t necessary, nor are the hips. We do consider them attractive for that reason though. My point was that our sexual desires are something very primal and instinctual, and decidedly not something that can be “taught” to overcome.