@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 3 months agowelpslrpnk.netmessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1885file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1885imagewelpslrpnk.net@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square74fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish37•edit-23 months agoPuts 40yo tech against current tech How is the current tech possibly winning…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•3 months agoAs others have pointed out, 40 year tech still beat current tech.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•3 months agoSure; but with a simple mistake that many people would (and inevitably did in this thread) make. I’d say it’s at least on par with people solving them.
Puts 40yo tech against current tech
How is the current tech possibly winning…
As others have pointed out, 40 year tech still beat current tech.
Sure; but with a simple mistake that many people would (and inevitably did in this thread) make.
I’d say it’s at least on par with people solving them.