• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18423 days ago

    There’s a reason captchas have moved mostly image identification systems. These text-based captchas have all been defeated for years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9423 days ago

      Yeah because whomever “owns” the data needs humans to train their bots, not because the image based bot detection is better than other methods.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8423 days ago

      The images are not actually the captcha. They’ve used other methods and tools to verify your authenticity, then they force you to help train their image recognition AI under the guise of it being the actual captcha. Its Distributed Forced Labor, and Google has been using captchas to do this for decades. Remeber the picture-of-two-words captcha? One word was always squiggly and the other was not. The squiggly word was the real captcha, the other word was from a scanned book and you were helping to train their OCR algorithms.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        623 days ago

        Yeah, at this point, most forms of image identification catches have also been defeated, not quite 100% success yet, but they’re getting there

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1023 days ago

          I mean the google one is literally training a Algorithm to identify the images so the shit defeats itself.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2123 days ago

      Funnily enough, the reason they switched to those was to use the data to train machine learning (AI) models, just like Google’s recaptcha was originally pictures of words from old, scanned books so they could transcribe all of them “for free” and train their transcription algorithms.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1523 days ago

        Man I miss the times when Google used to trick us into helping make knowledge more easily accessible to everyone. Now we just train fucking AI for luxury cars.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      923 days ago

      It’s a bit weird how that actually works though…

      “Which of these pictures are traffic lights?”

      I’d hope with all the self-driving-(ish) cars coming out, any AI like that should be able to identify a traffic light, right?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3023 days ago

        When you “solve” a captcha like that, you’re just helping train the AI you’re talking about.

        The stuff that determines whether you’re a not or not is based on browser information, how you interact with the page, etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      If they add audio captchas for the visual impaired then those image captchas can be circumvented. There is a Tampermonkey script on GitHub that can defeat Recaptcha by solving the audio captcha.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15123 days ago

    Nobody mentioning it got the captcha wrong? That’s a p not a P which while admittedly a tiny mistake would still be counted as a fail

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      522 days ago

      metalbags

      metal, semi-metal, plastic, fibre-glass.

      If you just talk about the material of the bag, yes, it is mostly metal and plastic. The costlier the stuff, the more the metal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      They’re not usually case sensitive.

      Maybe that’s how you can tell chatgpt has done it, it bothers to put some letters capitalised 😅

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4422 days ago

    Fun fact not only to captchas monitor your input but also can analyze how you input it. If you mouse moves in a perfectly straight line if all your key presses are precisely spaced, you are probably not human.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3622 days ago

        Sure two additional cases not that bad, now just keep adding them up. Like anything security related it’s not 100% perfect you just have to make it annoying to break.

        • Mubelotix
          link
          fedilink
          222 days ago

          Security by design is 100% perfect. Security by obscurity is far from it

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          122 days ago

          Meanwhile mathematicians working on cryptography: the universe will die before you get even 10% chance of cracking encryption.

          Security by obscurity is no security.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            222 days ago

            No. Security through obscurity is bad security, but it’s still an additional layer. And since there’s literally no way to 100% ensure that a machine is being controlled by a human, there’s literally no other way except saying “fuck it” and not doing any security at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        422 days ago

        They were used as example heuristics by Google marketing when they launched the checkbox reCaptcha. They were just simple to understand things for marketing purposes, but in reality Google checks many different signals and isn’t based on mouse movements. But people keep repeating the example from the ad.

      • @arin
        link
        222 days ago

        Yup they are called humanizers

  • The Giant Korean
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3922 days ago

    Now all the people they pay to solve these captchas will have to go find other work 😢

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      722 days ago

      I’m more worried about Google’s income. How can they afford to spy on me if they aren’t being paid far out the ass to host what will soon be security theatre.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        423 days ago

        Sure; but with a simple mistake that many people would (and inevitably did in this thread) make.

        I’d say it’s at least on par with people solving them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3322 days ago

    Honestly, I’m not mad if AI fully defeats captchas to the point they go away. They almost always fail to be usable via accessibility tools. These things might block some automated systems, but they also block people with disabilities.

    • Mubelotix
      link
      fedilink
      422 days ago

      What will you replace them with? They won’t go away, they will just get harder

      • Match!!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1422 days ago

        “lick this and tell me what it tastes like”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        622 days ago

        When I ran a public installation of web forum software (more than a decade ago), I got spambot registrations, then I think I just set up a captcha where users had to answer some really simple question; this kept the spambots away.

        • Mubelotix
          link
          fedilink
          422 days ago

          That worked because you were not personally targeted. Someone could defeat this system if they wanted to

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          222 days ago

          Yeah, it’s about barrier to entry. Any question will bypass dumb automation, even hard captcha is defeated by a Task Rabbit or Fiverr job to make 10 accounts and post some s#!t

          Probably at some point in the future, the automation tools they’re using will support throwing in a GPT API token. But AI calls aren’t free so maybe we’ll squeak by.

          There’s also the real possibility that if somebody is actually using AI the bot text will be good enough that nobody will know for certain it’s a bot.

  • Daemon Silverstein
    link
    fedilink
    3322 days ago

    Nowadays there are some really annoying CAPTCHAs out there, such as:

    • “Click over the figures that are upwards/downwards” and various rotated bears
    • “Rotate the figure until it matches the given orientation” and a finger pointing to some random direction, as well as rotation buttons that don’t work the way you would mathematically expect them to work
    • “Select all the images with a bicycle until there are none left” and the images take centuries to fade away after you click them
    • “Select all the squares containing a bus” and there are squares with the very corner of the bus that make you wonder if they are considered as part of “squares containing A bus”
    • “Fit the puzzle piece”, although this is the least annoying one

    In summary, the CAPTCHAs seemingly are becoming less of a “prove you’re not a robot” and more of an forced IQ test. I can see the day when CAPTCHAs will ask you to write down a Laplacian transform for the solution f(x) to the differential equation governing the motion of a mass considering the resistance of air and aerodynamics, or write down a detailed solution to the P versus NP problem.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2822 days ago

      It’s when they make you do like 20 of them. Bitch you already stopped the DDOS let me see my balance fuck.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2522 days ago

      Sony has the most annoying ones, which are designed to prevent people from submitting tickets. They’ll show you like 10 dice, and ask what they add up to. They make you solve like 16 of them before they let you continue. Shit should be illegal.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1222 days ago

          Because they’re not there to stop computers, they’re there to stop people from getting legitimate support from a company that owes it to them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      622 days ago

      No, CAPTCHAs these days track mouse movements and other factors. They make you second guess if something should be included because, as a human, that’s going to be something you do. And it’ll be obvious from both that hesitation and your squishy, inaccurate mouse movements that you’re a human.

          • Daemon Silverstein
            link
            fedilink
            822 days ago

            They can’t without the given permission from the browser to do so. While they can indeed track the mouse, when they try to access mobile motion sensors (I’m considering a CAPTCHA inside a webpage being accessed through a mobile browser such as Firefox mobile or Chrome for Android), they need to use an HTML5 API that, in turn, will ask the user for permission, something like “This site wants to use sensor motion data. Allow or block?”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      at that point i just assume im the one they are keeping out and just close the tab

      AlrightThenKeepYourSecrets.gif

  • @Ahardyfellow
    link
    1822 days ago

    Most bots out there aren’t backed by chat gpt. We had a flood of Russian boys using a sign up for on a site to send spam emails by putting the spam in the names and address fields. Slapping the most basic of captchas on the page solved it.

  • TheCookingSenpai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1123 days ago

    While everybody’s right in saying text captchas are outdated, there are concerning amount of services (especially for small-mid businesses) that still use them.

    Anyway, if an AI could control something like Selenium with the necessary modifications (aka not presenting itself as Selenium), I am pretty sure most of the “Click here to confirm you are an human” captchas like the cloudflare one would be defeated too.

    I think the most challenging are image-based weird challenges that are difficult even to humans. The annoying ones.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      222 days ago

      That’s the idea of those “which pictures contain bikes?” ones and the ReCaptcha (where you had two words from books). In the book one, one of the words is known and the other is not. They’ll present the same unknown word to people until they get a clear answer from many dozens or hundreds of entries, using the known word as a control. Then that other word goes into the known words category.