NegativeNull to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agoThey don’t think it be like it is, but it do!i.imgflip.commessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1322
arrow-up1322imageThey don’t think it be like it is, but it do!i.imgflip.comNegativeNull to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•edit-22 months agoa= “birds are dinos” b= “dinos are reptiles” c= “birds are reptiles” Structure: If a then b, therefore c a does not imply b without an additional statement (which we can assume from the rest would be “because birds are reptiles”) You’ve basically just said birds are reptiles because birds are reptiles
minus-squareNegativeNullOPlinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoI see. Thank you you for that explanation. I was letting inference do some heavy lifting. (and yes, I’m not a great communicator)
a= “birds are dinos”
b= “dinos are reptiles”
c= “birds are reptiles”
Structure: If a then b, therefore c
a does not imply b without an additional statement (which we can assume from the rest would be “because birds are reptiles”)
You’ve basically just said birds are reptiles because birds are reptiles
I see. Thank you you for that explanation. I was letting inference do some heavy lifting. (and yes, I’m not a great communicator)