• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Depends on if you’re using water to include types of water (if, like a maniacal madman, you have mixed Evian, Buxton and Harrogate mineral water into one jug). Then ‘i mixed fewer waters’ or ‘there are fewer waters in that glass’ would be valid.

      To be clear: I’m not the person you replied to, just someone who finds it quite interesting (in the same way that the plural fishes is valid if you’re talking about different species of fish).

      And yes, I know prescriptivism is bad, but also it is quite fun.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        Those are homonyms. Water versus waters. The second one is metaphorical.

        I did enjoy your comment and you sound like you’ve had some linguistic training.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Eh, you wouldn’t use the noun water to refer to atoms of water. ‘How many waters are there?’ to refer to atoms of water is the statement of someone deranged

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Water only exists as atoms. There is no non-discrete water, it is inherently in reality discrete.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I believe there are about 55.508435 moles of H2O in a liter of water at sea level (basically assuming 1 liter of water = 1kg of water)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          Atoms of water are measured in moles. Atoms are discrete units, a mole is just a certain number of them

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            So you understand then why water is uncountable but atoms are not. Congratulations. What a strange pedantic hill you choosing to die on.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              No, water is countable. Unfortunately you are incorrect.

              EDIT: the word “water” isn’t usually made plural, but water the substance can absolutely be measured and counted.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  Language is a flexible thing. I heard this in a children’s game of tag, “Octopi, Octopi, can I cross your waters?”

                  And you can count air too, either by volume or amount of molecules.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    12 months ago

                    I think you should just go and read the wikipedia articles on countable and noncountable nouns and stop arguing with a literal inguist.