• Alabaster_Mango
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We had some winners in my city a few years ago.

    Here’s my favorite quote from that article:

    “The money is in the car,” Comrie insists. “Who’s the spender? Does a bicyclist go and buy sporting goods, or furniture, or clothing? Or are they just out for a ride?”

    Does this guy think cyclists are sitting naked in empty apartments wishing they had clothes and furniture? Luckily he did not win the election.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      332 months ago

      I have a lot more money to buy shit ever since i rid myself of that money pit we call a car…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        OTOH it’s absolutely insane what new bicycles are costing these days - bikes can be money pits too. I bought my road bike 12 years ago for about $1800 and was kicking myself for years for spending that much. A modern road bike (with disc brakes, wi-fi controlled electronic shifters etc.) would be in the neighborhood of ten grand, more than my car cost. Meanwhile my favorite bike is the 25yo hybrid that I bought on Craigslist for $100.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 months ago

          Why would you ever want wifi controlled shifters‽ Maybe (ok definitely) I’m pilled on the whole anarchist bicycle repair scene, but I’ve got some decent trigger shifters that were like $30 and aside from the pain of calibration they’re great.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 months ago

            I was talking to a guy with an $8K bike the other day and he was proud of the fact that he could calibrate his shifters with his phone.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              On one hand if it’s automatic it might be nice, but on the other hand I’d rather just have a separate tool that does that so I can share it with friends and we can all have easy shifter calibration. But also I’d dread someone being able to hack my shifters or being unable to shift when I forget to plug it in. But on the other hand my bike has probably cost me like $200-250 over the three years I’ve had it so I’m definitely not the target audience

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        He did say the money was in the car, he just didn’t mean to imply that a car is a hole in the road that you throw money into.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 months ago

      The carbrained can’t see cycling as a form of transport, only as a type of exercise. In their minds people only cycle to cycle, not to fulfil other tasks. Only cars are for going places, like shopping.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      252 months ago

      Why, the cyclist needs no clothes or food, for the cyclist is sub-human and is therefore an animal (what these car-brained people probably think)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, “serious” cycling — a sport where a $1k bike barely qualifies as a bike, $5k gets you something rideable, and $10k gets you a pretty decent bike — is so anti-consumer!

      (I love cycling, and I’ll defend spending more on my power meter pedels than I would spend on a decent used bike. More bike lanes everywhere please!)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      Yeah because someone who never exercises, you know the type of person who only moves around the city in a car, buys sporting goods frequently. Yep.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      I really hate that that’s treated as a legitimate argument as opposed to a criticism of capitalism

    • madjo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      They only think of cycling for sport and not cycling to a destination. That’s where the confusion lies.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      Hey now, they specifically added a ton of people to distract from his appearance, which was a kindness

    • TheRealKuni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 months ago

      THANK YOU.

      (Obviously this doesn’t matter. Language evolves. And no one cared about this rule until the last 200 years or so. But my parents drilled this particular correction so firmly into my brain that it bothers me when others get it wrong. “Fewer in number, less in amount.” Similarly, “farther in distance, further in degree.” And you stand on a PODIUM, you speak from behind a LECTERN.)

      (I might have some lexicographical trauma. 😅)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Less bike lanes

    100% he’s going to make that happen

    and cheaper parking

    0% he’s going to make that happen

    Free market, bitches! Prices. Only. Go. Up!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    good news. car brained loser is sitting on 3.36%.

    well funded campaign (assume oxford st small biz tyrants and paddington geriatrics), posters everywhere.

    https://vtr.elections.nsw.gov.au/LG2401/sydney/mayoral

    i wish this would be seen as a vindication for active transport… but we all know the anti bike blow hards wont miss a beat.

    edit: big fucking lol. dont think they will get a single council seat.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      After reading the title and seeing the black abyss in the eyes of the great-value Voldemort wannabe, I was scared for a moment that someone who was so openly hostile towards the safety of cyclists could win an election. It brings me great relief to know that is not the case.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      well funded campaign (assume oxford st small biz tyrants and paddington geriatrics), posters everywhere.

      love the no bullshit analysis naming the supporters specifically…

      we should make politicians wear their sponsors on their suits like NASCAR drivers so folks know who they are allotting their tax money to lol

  • mosscap
    link
    fedilink
    English
    452 months ago

    Oh look, another old white man with stupid ideas

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “Fewer” since they are countable.

    ETA this is basic grammar and not something you can just take exception with because you feel like it. The responses I’m receiving are very odd.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 months ago

              Depends on if you’re using water to include types of water (if, like a maniacal madman, you have mixed Evian, Buxton and Harrogate mineral water into one jug). Then ‘i mixed fewer waters’ or ‘there are fewer waters in that glass’ would be valid.

              To be clear: I’m not the person you replied to, just someone who finds it quite interesting (in the same way that the plural fishes is valid if you’re talking about different species of fish).

              And yes, I know prescriptivism is bad, but also it is quite fun.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  Eh, you wouldn’t use the noun water to refer to atoms of water. ‘How many waters are there?’ to refer to atoms of water is the statement of someone deranged

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 months ago

                Those are homonyms. Water versus waters. The second one is metaphorical.

                I did enjoy your comment and you sound like you’ve had some linguistic training.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I believe there are about 55.508435 moles of H2O in a liter of water at sea level (basically assuming 1 liter of water = 1kg of water)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              If there are two bike lanes merging into one, there are one, two or three bike lanes?

              Water isn’t countable but lanes are.

              What question are you answering?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They are indeed… Where did the whole “if two bike lanes converge” question come from??

      I was going to make the same joke.

      “Fewer. I mean more. More bike lanes.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 months ago

    God please no, Sydney actually has viable public transport compared to something like the US.

    There’s so many cool JDM type stuff there probably because enthusiasts keep cars around the city.

    I’d much rather be able to see all the slick WRXs and Evos while walking than having to drive a crapbox into Sydney.

  • madjo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 months ago

    But he’s posing in front of a tram? Make it make sense!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 months ago

    I guess regardless of country, people pushing shit like this can’t seem to make a natural looking facial expression. Its like they try to replicate what happy people look like to them in order to get the response they see others receive but the best they can do is the trail leading into the uncanny valley