• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    19 hours ago

    If hand counting is so error prone then why do we hand count during recounts and as you said during spot checks?

    I don’t buy it.

    Perhaps support for hand counting is partly coming from people hoping it will cause chaos. I don’t think it will based on my own limited experience in elections and weather it will or won’t, even the stopped clock of people who want to prevent and slow down the count tells the right time twice a day.

    Why is it such a big deal to know the next day who the winner is? They don’t take office until the next calendar year.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Because you can do it well at small scale at modest expense. It’s expensive to do well and fast for ballots with lots of offices and in large numbers.

      This decision, unaccompanied by money to hire people, basically guarantees chaos.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 hours ago

        I don’t buy that.

        I know personally that election worker pay is dogshit. It’s way too cheap to do an election. Even if it weren’t, even if a person didn’t have my mistrust of machine voting, wouldn’t recognizing that the vote will likely be contested mean that going ahead and preparing to do a hand count anyway be the right choice?

        I mean, we’re headed for hand counts in the future anyway because no one trusts the elections. Even if someone wasn’t a proponent of hand counts like me, isn’t it good to be ready?

        What chaos that you talked about is gonna be brought on by this hand count? I can’t help but think that the whole election is chaotic…