• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Because you can do it well at small scale at modest expense. It’s expensive to do well and fast for ballots with lots of offices and in large numbers.

    This decision, unaccompanied by money to hire people, basically guarantees chaos.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 hours ago

      I don’t buy that.

      I know personally that election worker pay is dogshit. It’s way too cheap to do an election. Even if it weren’t, even if a person didn’t have my mistrust of machine voting, wouldn’t recognizing that the vote will likely be contested mean that going ahead and preparing to do a hand count anyway be the right choice?

      I mean, we’re headed for hand counts in the future anyway because no one trusts the elections. Even if someone wasn’t a proponent of hand counts like me, isn’t it good to be ready?

      What chaos that you talked about is gonna be brought on by this hand count? I can’t help but think that the whole election is chaotic…