• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They wouldn’t have spent 60k on books over that time, they’ve only saved that much because the books were free. If they had to pay for the books they would have been more selective and less liberal in the amount.

    Spending $150 a week is just a lot of money to spend on books, it’s only that much because of the free price tag, so it’s extremely disingenuous to use that amount as people wouldn’t realistically spend that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        A more realistic metric would be used books (also reflects the quality of all but brand new fresh books which are a rarity obviously), but you can’t quantify that price, so yes using new is disingenuous, but go off on a rant I guess? I think it’s a great idea, but let’s not kid ourselves that people would actually be spending that amount on books. It’s great for a feel good story though, I’ll give you that.

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          A more realistic metric would be used books

          Do used bookstores all charge the same prices these days?