• Ebby
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    So we’re changing “Sell By” and “Best Before” to "Use By” and "Best if Used By”

    I don’t really see this helping food waste at the consumer end, but greatly benefits supermarkets by allowing products to remain on shelves longer and closer to spoilage.

    However, in that case customers could have less margin to use their purchased groceries before they go bad.

    I think this has a chance to backfire. There is greater incentive to dig around for the product with the most time. Those who frequently shop or most desperate would buy the items expiring sooner, but folks like me who only really check items I’ve been burned on, will start checking everything. I’m not buying a $3.99 head of lettuce with 2 days left.

    EDIT: don’t grocery stores already donate lots of near-expiration unspoiled food to support systems? I thought there was a organization in CA that coordinated all that. They may see a dip in donations.

    • DominusOfMegadeus
      link
      fedilink
      1212 hours ago

      I could be completely ignorant, but I don’t think I have ever seen two use dates on foods in the US before.

      • Ebby
        link
        fedilink
        110 hours ago

        What? An item wouldn’t have both dates. But almost everything has at least one.

        • paraphrand
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 hours ago

          The article does seem to suggest two would be in use.

    • @mikezane
      link
      English
      18 hours ago

      "It will require the use of “Best if Used By” label to signal peak quality and “Use By” label for product safety,*.

      There will be two dates on products. “best of used by” is what you are used to and when grocery stores will most likely pull the product. “Use by” date will be a second date further out where you might want to actually throw it away.