• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53 days ago

    Oooh, so Kamala is playing 5D chess and will do an about-face on Biden’s genocide policy when she enters office? Because her past record is so stellar on this issue? Like that time she had wine from an illegal settlement served at the White House? She and her boss wipe their ass with the rule of all and all pretensions of even basic human morality on an international level, but she’s not Trump!

    • @aubeynarf
      link
      15 hours ago

      “genocide policy”? The talking points are so transparent at this point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Strawman much? Or are you arguing with voices I can’t hear?

      Edit: Y’know what? I’m curious. How do you envision her coming out against Israel going? Let’s hear your version of how things would go, because I can’t hear these arguments as anything other than “I support Trump.”

      So please, enlighten me as to how this would go down without Trump being elected and making the situation worse.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 days ago

        Do you think you’re on The West Wing or something? You’ll have your curiosity sated when you learn to step out of the Blue MAGA bubble and engage with reality.

          • @aubeynarf
            link
            15 hours ago

            It is. The Biden administration does not have a policy to, nor are they, committing genocide. No one is arguing that they should.

            That clearly fits the definition:

            an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent’s real argument

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            No, of course not, it’s just saying their argument is something that it isn’t. I swear there is a term for that.

            To be fair, I get it. Because I can’t hear your arguments as anything other than “I support genocide”.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 days ago

              Stating what I take the arguments as, is absolutely not a strawman. At no point did I say “you are stating that you want Trump to win, why would you say that?”

              If you need me to define strawman arguments, I can. But it might be better if you just googled it instead.

              Of course you could always shove your head deeper in that hole if you like. Perhaps going “lalalalala” while doing so.