• @ReallyActuallyFrankenstein
    link
    English
    72 months ago

    This was such a disappointing article.

    Yes, I agree with all of the things said and will be voting for Kamala. But this is a former WHO epidemiologist, so do we get information on how we would apply the learnings of epidemiology to treat this epidemic of irrational, self-harming personality-worship? Do we get any diagnostic characteristics? Any way to contain the spread? Any practical guidance whatsoever?

    Nope, just a low-effort rant.

    This is just another gawker, pointing and gasping at the slow-motion trainwreck of Trump running into democracy. I really really wish some of these articles would actually try to propose solutions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      What are the solutions though? I don’t think this descent stops until the MAGA crowd gets most of what they want and realize it sucks ass to live that way which is going to come with a lot of pain for everyone. They’re clearly not willing or able to learn from history, think through policies without experiencing the negative consequences personally, or distinguish reality from propaganda and/or wishful thinking. What options for resolution does that leave us with?

      The only thing I can see that might work is fighting them off until enough of the old folks in their camp die and hoping the younger crowd doesn’t follow in their footsteps. That’s not a particularly appealing plan but I’m not sure what else is on the table.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        I’m vaguely hopeful that continuing to lose at the ballot box will de-motivate them enough for this current frothing at the mouth to die out.

      • @ReallyActuallyFrankenstein
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        What are the solutions though? I don’t think this descent stops until the MAGA crowd gets most of what they want…

        That’s where we’re headed, sure. What we need is someone to explain (a) the forces at play at some deeper level, and (b) tell us how we fix it.

        That’s why this is a disappointing article: The headline proposes an interesting idea - treat the Trump/MAGA mental illness as a disease - and then immediately forgets about it. We deal with diseases all the time, and even if mental disease is a challenge to diagnose and treat, it’s a great framework! Studies may be able to show most MAGA disease vectors are people with X, Y and Z verifiable, objective psychological disorders or features. They may theorize that if we treat those disorders, we can save those people from this type of self-harm (which is what MAGA is at this point). That’s a fantastic concept! Similar to the far too unexplored concept of treating this as a cult deprogramming. If we work the problem maybe we can come up with a solution that doesn’t involve fascism winning, or us all killing each other in a civil war.

        Instead, it’s just “this is bad…really bad.” Ok, thank you Mr. WHO epidemiologist.

        (I know, I’m not helping either - but I’m not smart enough in epidemiology, or cult deprogramming. Comment posting is my therapy, nothing more.)