• Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    On the surface - perhaps. But Iran’s regime has to keep its image of power for its domestic peace. Israel’s gov knows this and they do steps they know would elicit response from Iran in the hopes Iran would actually hit hard and the US would be dragged in official capacity. That would be dramatically destabilizing for the region. I reckon the US threatened Israel with real steps in order to get them to not hit targets that would have led to such escalation.

      • acargitz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        30
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        By dismantling the apartheid, ending the occupation, getting the fuck on their side of their 1967 border, and recognizing the sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza. Plus, by handing over their war criminals to the ICC and starting a Truth and Reconciliation process. Throw in paying reparations, if they really want peace.

        There. Instantly, 90% of Hamas and Hezbollah support has just evaporated. Their neighbours are ready to normalize relations with them. The vast majority of world public opinion is now solidly behind them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          I’d be quite fine with most of this, all of it if by “the occupation” you mean the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. But, until peace is established there, that isn’t going to happen. The majority of Gazans support Hamas and believe they committed no atrocities on October 7th.

          • acargitz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            if by “the occupation” you mean the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank

            Yes, exactly. Including the control of their borders of course.

            until peace is established there, that isn’t going to happen

            That’s entirely the wrong framing. Without these things happening, whatever it is that you think will be established, it won’t be “peace”, is is only a return to the oppressive status quo ante. It’s a cliché but in this conflict, quite literally “no justice, no peace”. My laundry list above is not a desirable outcome after some imaginary unjust “peace”. It is the precondition for peace. Without dismantling the apartheid, the occupation, etc, you’ll only have a temporary lull in the brutality and they go again.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        282 months ago

        Stop making an enemy of all their neighbors with their apartheid/genocide project, would be a good start.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          With the number of rockets Hamas and Hezbollah has launched into Israel during “peacetime” while being supplied by Iran, they’re doing a great job of staying enemies.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            212 months ago

            Did you know that the Gazan bomb disposal teams are some of the most skilled in the world? The reason for this is so they can disarm and disassemble unexploded Israeli bombs so that the explosives can be repurposed and fired back. So a surprisingly large portion of the explosives that Hamas used were supplied by Israel via their long-term sporadic bombing of Gaza and anything resembling major infrastructure.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              Impressive feat. But Iran is still aiding and abetting Hamas’s military campaign against Israel.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                222 months ago

                Well maybe Israel should stop its brutal, decades-long apartheid campaign that’s pissing off all of its neighbors and pre-dates Hamas by around 50 years.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  How many of these brutal wars were started by Israel completely unprovoked, and how many of them were started because Israel’s neighbors F-ed around before finding out?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    182 months ago

                    I’m not talking about wars. I’m talking about Israeli apartheid, all of which was and continues to be enacted exclusively by Israel.

                  • Cethin
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    13
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Arguably, all of them involving Israel were started by Israel. Colonists coming in and buying the farm, then refusing to hire the local non-jews who traditionally worked there, is going to provoke a response. They knew this, and it’s why they formed militias to attack them and use the response as justification to expand militarily. These militias were formed into the IDF when Israel officially became a nation.

                    Sure, you can also argue that buying up the land and not hiring the locals was “their right” but you can’t really complain when people lose their ability to survive because some foreigners come in and take away their jobs.

                    Israel has continued this policy of forcing a response from their neighbors and then using this as justification to use much more force to take more territory. Its not happening by accident. It’s a strategic move by Israel to provoke their neighbors, yet somehow people like you say the neighbors should have done nothing. Maybe Israel should do nothing. Who’s justified?

              • NoneOfUrBusiness
                link
                fedilink
                132 months ago

                But Iran is still aiding and abetting Hamas’s military campaign against Israel.

                You say aiding and abetting like supporting anti-colonial resistance is a bad thing.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness
            link
            fedilink
            182 months ago

            Good job putting peacetime in quotes, because during that “peacetime” Israel was airstriking Gaza and blockading it. These are straight up acts of war and justify and demand retaliation. Also Hezbollah didn’t launch rockets on Israel before October 7th.

            • SaltySalamander
              link
              fedilink
              32 months ago

              Lol, not being an Israel apologist here, but Hezbollah has been launching rockets at Israel since they were formed.

              • Sami
                link
                fedilink
                English
                92 months ago

                Into Lebanese (some consider it Syrian, doesn’t change the dynamic) occupied territory before and after Oct 7th. Gradual escalation (with 80% of those attacks coming from Israeli side) expanded the scale of the northern/southern front to what we see today. Israel has killed 2 orders of magnitude more civilians than Hezballah has and has sought escalation at every stage.

                Before Oct 7th, they would exchange fire in occupied Lebanese land and tensions would rise then fizzle out about once a month.

                  • Sami
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    112 months ago

                    Israel should stop occupying territory in violation of dozens of international resolutions and blocking the establishment of a Palestinian state. Belligerent occupiers are in no position to be “provoked” by those who they are occupying. How many wars do the Palestinians get to wage because of the nakba (or countless other massacres) and subsequent colonization of remaining territory?

                  • NoneOfUrBusiness
                    link
                    fedilink
                    92 months ago

                    They should… not subject people to Apartheid and ethnically cleanse them. That’d help.

                    The initial plan of the militants was to seize a luxury hotel in the Israeli city of Tel Aviv and take tourists and foreign ambassadors hostage to exchange them for Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody.

                    Also you say Lebanon but what the fuck do you mean by “Lebanon”? They literally had a civil war at the time. Who exactly are you assigning blame to here and why does that excuse Israel expanding their Apartheid and massacres to another country?

              • NoneOfUrBusiness
                link
                fedilink
                32 months ago

                They have a long blood soaked history that had mostly ended with the second Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 2006 before restarting last year.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            202 months ago

            They said leave all 1967 occupied areas.

            You responded with the entire population of Israel.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              And I later asked how this will appease all these other actors that just want to wipe Israel off the map. How will that happen?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  Does that make Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas any more likely to establish lasting peace with Israel if they surrender a tiny sliver of land?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    112 months ago

                    If Israel de-occupies Palestinian and Lebanese land, stops blockading Gaza, stops blowing up chunks of it’s neighbors, then it removes any moral grounds for them to continue fighting Israel. Instead we’re to believe Israel is the defender when they’ve occupied their neighbors for 50+ years.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            162 months ago

            They don’t have to go anywhere. They just don’t get a religious ethnostate any more. Let Palestine be a free democracy and they are welcome to live in a free society, no apartheid.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                172 months ago

                All the post 67 land are considered occupied why Palestinians should give up their land?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  I thought the entirety of Israel was unlawfully and immorally seized from the Palestinians over the course of decades. At least, that’s what most pro-Palestine folks seem to think.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    112 months ago

                    It is but most of us are not heartless people who would like to kick out 8 millions people

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  I thought the entirety of Israel was unlawfully and immorally seized from the Palestinians over the course of decades. At least, that’s what most pro-Palestine folks seem to think.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    4
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Ethnic Cleansing has always been a cornerstone of Zionism.

                    Origins of Zionism

                    Zionism is a settler colonialism project that was able to really start with the support of British Imperialism. Zionism as a political movement started with Theodore Herzl in the 1880s as a ‘modern’ way to ‘solve’ the ‘Jewish Question’ of Europe.

                    Since at least the 1860’s, Europe was increasingly antisemitic and hostile to Jewish people. Zionism was explicitly a Setter Colonialist movement and the native Palestinians were not considered People but Savages by the Europeans. While Zionist Colonization began before it, the Balfor Declaration is when Britain gave it’s backing of the movement in order to ‘solve’ the ‘Jewish Question’ while also creating a Colony in the newly conquered Middle East after WWI in order to exhibit military force in the region and extract natural resources.

                    That’s when Zionist immigration started to pick up, out of necessity for most as Europe became more hostile and antisemitic. That continued into and during WWII, European countries and even the US refused to expand immigration quotas for Jewish people seeking asylum. The idea that the creation of Israel is a reparation for Jewish people is an after-the-fact justification. While most Jewish immigrants had no choice and just wanted a place to live in peace, it was the Zionist Leadership that developed and implemented the forced transfer, ethnic cleansing, of the native population, Palestinians. Without any Occupation, Apartheid, and ethnic cleansing, there would not be any Palestinian resistance to it.

                    Herzl himself explicitly considered Zionism a Settler Colonialist project, Setter Colonialism is always violent. The difficulty in creating a democratic Jewish state in an area inhabited by people who are not Jewish, is that enough Palestinian people need to be ‘Transferred’ to have a demographic majority that is Jewish. Ben-Gurion explicitly rejected Secular Bi-national state solutions in favor of partition.

                    Quote

                    Zionism’s aims in Palestine, its deeply-held conviction that the Land of Israel belonged exclusively to the Jewish people as a whole, and the idea of Palestine’s “civilizational barrenness" or “emptiness” against the background of European imperialist ideologies all converged in the logical conclusion that the native population should make way for thenewcomers.

                    The idea that the Palestinian Arabs must find a place for themselves elsewhere was articulated early on. Indeed, the founder of the movement, Theodor Herzl, provided an early reference to transfer even before he formally outlined his theory of Zionist rebirth in his Judenstat.

                    An 1895 entry in his diary provides in embryonic form many of the elements that were to be demonstrated repeatedly in the Zionist quest for solutions to the “Arab problem ”-the idea of dealing with state governments over the heads of the indigenous population, Jewish acquisition of property that would be inalienable, “Hebrew Land" and “Hebrew Labor,” and the removal of the native population.

                    Settlements, Occupation, and Apartheid

                    Israel justifies the settlements and military bases in the West Bank in the name of Security. However, the reality of the settlements on-the-ground has been the cause of violent resistance and a significant obstacle to peace, as it has been for decades.

                    This type of settlement, where the native population gets ‘Transferred’ to make room for the settlers, is a long standing practice.

                    The mass ethnic cleansing campaign of 1948:

                    Further, declassified Israeli documents show that the Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip were deliberately planned before being executed in 1967:

                    While the peace process was exploited to continue de-facto annexation of the West Bank via Settlements

                    The settlements are maintained through a violent apartheid that routinely employs violence towards Palestinians and denies human rights like water access, civil rights, etc. This kind of control gives rise to violent resistance to the Apartheid occupation, jeopardizing the safety of Israeli civilians.

                    The apartheid regime is based on organized, systemic violence against Palestinians, which is carried out by numerous agents: the government, the military, the Civil Administration, the Supreme Court, the Israel Police, the Israel Security Agency, the Israel Prison Service, the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, and others. Settlers are another item on this list, and the state incorporates their violence into its own official acts of violence. Settler violence sometimes precedes instances of official violence by Israeli authorities, and at other times is incorporated into them. Like state violence, settler violence is organized, institutionalized, well-equipped and implemented in order to achieve a defined strategic goal.

                    Apartheid Evidence

                    Amnesty Report

                    Human Rights Watch Report

                    B’TSelem Report with quick Explainer

                    Visualizing the Ethnic Cleansing

                    Peace Process and Solution

                    Both Hamas and Fatah have agreed to a Two-State solution based on the 1967 borders for decades. Oslo and Camp David were used by Israel to continue settlements in the West Bank and maintain an Apartheid, while preventing any actual Two-State solution

                    How Avi Shlaim moved from two-state solution to one-state solution

                    ‘One state is a game changer’: A conversation with Ilan Pappe

                    One State Solution, Foreign Affairs

                    Historian Works on the History
          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 months ago

            to be fair, it’s much easier if you just annex and slaughter the fucking browns who are there

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 months ago

              Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organizations, and Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. Do you want to go to bat for them?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                122 months ago

                Calling the people you dislike “terrorists” to avoid critical thinking about the atrocities (including genocide) of your own side isn’t really the gotcha you think it is.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  42 months ago

                  I’m not calling them that on my own. I’m describing them the way multiple other nations have described them - not Israel. You only need to see their actions towards their own population to see why.

                • SaltySalamander
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 months ago

                  Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and Israel are currently acting as terrorist states/groups. That isn’t up for debate, because it’s objective reality.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    62 months ago

                    I’m not sure that there is credible evidence of Iran and its affiliates targeting civilians the same way that the occupation has, their acts all seem to be targeting military installations rather than civilian targets. The occupation primarily targets civilians and civilian infrastructure.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                112 months ago

                Otzma Jehudit is part of the Israeli Government coalition, it consists mainly of internationally wanted terrorists. and you want to bat for these terrorists? the ones who have been preaching the 14 words as a justification for genocide?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  Assuming that’s true, that’s one group within the government. Find them, try them, and imprison them. On the other side are three entire genocidal terrorist regimes. Will you side with them? What do you think we should do with them?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    122 months ago

                    we don’t need to fucking find them, they are open, they give speeches about how starving and killing every Palestinian is a moral good on a daily basis. they ARE the government, who’s going to put them in front of a judge and find them guilty, themselves? you are literally supporting a genocidal terrorist regime.