The daily beast is a tabloid with a reputation for being dishonest, has nothing to do with the title of the article, or even with the topic being trump.
p.s. fuck that guy in case anybody thinks that’s what this is about.
sometimes text is not meant to be taken too literally and there is slightly different meaning to it. but don’t worry, you will learn about that later in your education, for now keep doing good job in the elementary school…
we had a bot for that, but then bunch of snowflakes for whom pressing the block button was too much work whined so insufferably that they won, so we no longer have a bot for that.
The dailybeast, really?
I double checked and that is definitely a hyperlink to the daily beast. It was right there when I looked at the URL. I hope that helps.
I think you should check again, just to be sure.
It’s tough to be an expert at what is and isn’t The Daily Beast
The daily beast is a tabloid with a reputation for being dishonest, has nothing to do with the title of the article, or even with the topic being trump.
p.s. fuck that guy in case anybody thinks that’s what this is about.
sometimes text is not meant to be taken too literally and there is slightly different meaning to it. but don’t worry, you will learn about that later in your education, for now keep doing good job in the elementary school…
Your momma
Oh. I see. Not an elementary school, rather a kindergarten. Well, keep up the good work.
The zeitgeist is against you today. Today’s zeitgeist is “edgy teen” for your downvoting pleasure.
Le epic comeback, m’goodsir
What’s the issue with it? Sorry, I’m not very knowledgeable about how trustworthy sources are.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-beast/
we had a bot for that, but then bunch of snowflakes for whom pressing the block button was too much work whined so insufferably that they won, so we no longer have a bot for that.
We found the whining!
Thank fuck.
Yours, a snowflake.
What’s to dislike about the bot?
It’s harder to promote propaganda if people can’t lazily see the leaning & credibility of the website
If people can’t? Don’t you mean can? Or is this a ‘bias checker is biased’ circumstance?
Yah I think I wrote it wrong, but yah, meant having a fact checker is a positive thing.
I can imagine it must be incredibly annoying for Boris to be automatically fact-checked every time they say something stupid.
A bot that calls a factual source “biased left” is creating its own right-wing bias.
People really got all up in something completely unimportant. As best I can tell people just hated the fact that it exists and isn’t 100% perfect.
It will eventually try to eat us.
Excellent, that bot existed to spread election disinformation.