@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 22 hours agoTrump Mocks Mitch McConnell for Endorsing Him, Then Forgets Where He Iswww.thedailybeast.commessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1377
arrow-up1377external-linkTrump Mocks Mitch McConnell for Endorsing Him, Then Forgets Where He Iswww.thedailybeast.com@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 22 hours agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareGregorlinkfedilink15•21 hours agoWhat’s the issue with it? Sorry, I’m not very knowledgeable about how trustworthy sources are.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink15•edit-220 hours ago Bias Rating: LEFT Factual Reporting: MIXED Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-beast/ we had a bot for that, but then bunch of snowflakes for whom pressing the block button was too much work whined so insufferably that they won, so we no longer have a bot for that.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•9 hours agoExcellent, that bot existed to spread election disinformation.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•9 hours agoA bot that calls a factual source “biased left” is creating its own right-wing bias.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•16 hours agoPeople really got all up in something completely unimportant. As best I can tell people just hated the fact that it exists and isn’t 100% perfect.
minus-square@Good_morninglink7•18 hours agoIt’s harder to promote propaganda if people can’t lazily see the leaning & credibility of the website
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•18 hours agoIf people can’t? Don’t you mean can? Or is this a ‘bias checker is biased’ circumstance?
minus-square@Good_morninglink2•9 hours agoYah I think I wrote it wrong, but yah, meant having a fact checker is a positive thing.
minus-squareAdderbox76linkfedilinkEnglish1•17 hours agoI can imagine it must be incredibly annoying for Boris to be automatically fact-checked every time they say something stupid.
What’s the issue with it? Sorry, I’m not very knowledgeable about how trustworthy sources are.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-beast/
we had a bot for that, but then bunch of snowflakes for whom pressing the block button was too much work whined so insufferably that they won, so we no longer have a bot for that.
Excellent, that bot existed to spread election disinformation.
We found the whining!
Thank fuck.
Yours, a snowflake.
What’s to dislike about the bot?
A bot that calls a factual source “biased left” is creating its own right-wing bias.
People really got all up in something completely unimportant. As best I can tell people just hated the fact that it exists and isn’t 100% perfect.
It’s harder to promote propaganda if people can’t lazily see the leaning & credibility of the website
If people can’t? Don’t you mean can? Or is this a ‘bias checker is biased’ circumstance?
Yah I think I wrote it wrong, but yah, meant having a fact checker is a positive thing.
I can imagine it must be incredibly annoying for Boris to be automatically fact-checked every time they say something stupid.
It will eventually try to eat us.