@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 17 hours agoaerodynamicsmander.xyzmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1285arrow-down17
arrow-up1278arrow-down1imageaerodynamicsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 17 hours agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-214 hours agoWouldn’t a lobster technically be waterodynamic? Or eauodynamic? What’s Latin for water…?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•14 hours agoUgh, of course! Thank you! So dumb of me. Hydrohomies and all. Appreciate it.
Wouldn’t a lobster technically be waterodynamic? Or eauodynamic? What’s Latin for water…?
Hydrodynamic
Ugh, of course! Thank you! So dumb of me. Hydrohomies and all. Appreciate it.