• @dmMeYourNudes
    link
    English
    64 hours ago

    There’s a Jordan Peterson joke in here somewhere

  • Annoyed_🦀
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47 hours ago

    Cyclist hate this not because of the danger it pose, but because it’s not aero.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2712 hours ago

    Well… duh? A fairer comparison would be the cow vs jeep. A sea creature vs something designed for land isn’t that great of a comparison because water is thick enough that you’re going to need some kind of aerodynamic (fluodynamic?) adaptation to survive. Air is thin enough that evolution can sacrifice some aerodynamics for other traits.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 hours ago

      At the speed cars move at, air behaves much like water. They’re both fluids. The faster you move the more resistance it has, but also the more dense the fluid is the more resistance it has. Moving quickly through the air is similar to moving slowly through water.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 hours ago

      I think it would be hydrodynamic and screw evolution I want my beef to be as aerodynamic as an F1.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2414 hours ago

    I’m gonna need to put oversized tires, a jack, and a custom air intake on it for all my trips to Walmart.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Wouldn’t a lobster technically be waterodynamic? Or eauodynamic? What’s Latin for water…?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 hours ago

    That looks like a TJ generation. I’ve also seen these with the JK (usually compared with a cow). I’d be curious to see the JL/JT, though, because they did a very clever job of rounding it off while making it look like it’s still flat.