Summary

Project 2025, a manifesto supported by the conservative Heritage Foundation, calls for a ban on pornography, labeling its purveyors as criminals and advocating for strict penalties, including jail time for producers and registered sex offender status for educators distributing it.

The manifesto argues that porn lacks First Amendment protection, framing it as harmful and exploitative.

With a right-leaning Supreme Court, proponents aim to overturn existing protections established in Miller v. California, potentially impacting mainstream media.

Donald Trump has pledged to bring Project 2025 contributors onto his team.

  • cum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -214 days ago

    That’s a terrible way to think

    • Cruxifux
      link
      fedilink
      3714 days ago

      If you don’t think the incel groups that are super pro trump getting their porn privileges revoked isn’t funny as fuck, you’re wrong.

      • Zement
        link
        fedilink
        114 days ago

        Incels do not consume legal porn. That why they are so fucked up.

            • Cruxifux
              link
              fedilink
              914 days ago

              Oh. I’m a moron. Thanks for being patient with my brain worms.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                314 days ago

                I love that brain worms has fully entered the lexicon at this point. Can’t wait for those New Year recaps.

          • Zement
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            Streaming porn is not illegal… yet. Incels consume porn you can’t stream. That’s what I meant with “illegal porn”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      514 days ago

      As hard as you try you can never stop people from posting porn on the internet. It would be as big of a disaster as the war on drugs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        414 days ago

        A law that virtually everyone breaks and is easily selectively enforced is extremely valuable to authoritarian regimes. It’s a wildcard to imprison whoever they want.