Summary

Project 2025, a manifesto supported by the conservative Heritage Foundation, calls for a ban on pornography, labeling its purveyors as criminals and advocating for strict penalties, including jail time for producers and registered sex offender status for educators distributing it.

The manifesto argues that porn lacks First Amendment protection, framing it as harmful and exploitative.

With a right-leaning Supreme Court, proponents aim to overturn existing protections established in Miller v. California, potentially impacting mainstream media.

Donald Trump has pledged to bring Project 2025 contributors onto his team.

  • socsa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 hours ago

    The porn ban will just be the excuse they use to crack down on VPNs so they can implement a full on Chinese style internet censorship program.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 hour ago

      Goof luck for the companies depending on VPNs…but hey, Donnie’s going to crash the economy anyway, so why fret.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52 hours ago

    Do you want angry fat basement dwellers to rise up? Take away their porn. Let’s see how this plays out.

  • Joker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    People who voted for Trump after he won:

    The same people after he declare porn illegal.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    43 hours ago

    I guess I gotta do my part and jack off twice a day or more to get the best of the porn we still have.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      354 minutes ago

      Ironically, they’re also significantly more likely to watch transgender porn. People are weird and stupid.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    598 hours ago

    I hope they actually do it. This is like the abortion issue, if they actually go through with it people will be like “What?? How could this happen??”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 hours ago

      Doesn’t this proposal also make anyone who participates in the production of porn into a criminal?

      Is the first Lady going to get arrested for her involvement in the creation of porn?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 hours ago

        Historically, you can’t be charged for crimes you committed before the law criminalizing them was passed. However, precedence and fair application of the law have lost all meaning so you could be arrested, but she wouldn’t.

    • IninewCrow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5910 hours ago

      First president to have actual nude photos of his wife available.

      If any other president, especially a Democrat, had nudes of their wife it would be a scandal.

      But America is so beholden to these idiots that it doesn’t even matter to anyone.

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        208 hours ago

        There are lots of things they do that’re scandalous. That’s not one of them. There’s already enough puritanical bullshit fucking up the US. It’s about time some of it were left in the past.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6510 hours ago

    Historically speaking people have two things they riot for, safety and comfort. How that comfort manifest varies but pornography is definitely on the same level as whiskey, and the United states has had a rebellion on that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      298 hours ago

      And somehow we just elected a guy who has no qualms with turning the military and the police on its own citizens despite legal doctrine.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        158 hours ago

        Well luckily the military has a good chance of not listening to him, atleast in my opinion. The police on the other hand are more of a threat, though not an insurmountable one.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          54 hours ago

          The liberal officers are going to resign in protest then pat themselves on the back and call it integrity.

          Then the fascists are going to follow orders.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            13 hours ago

            Luckily the chain of command helps dilute the worst of this type of effect. As I understand it most orders will have to go through the folks at the Pentagon first and they could very well just say no or otherwise pull some malicious compliance.

            Reminder the military has a more or less parallel system to the civil system. Its entirely possible they may just decide to separate themselves more or less.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                I live in an area with veterans and its a bit more of a mixed bag. Most of them are dissolutioned with the system, its not that they dont have political leanings they just hate both. The ones who are politically active are usually lowd and dumb as fuck Republicans, the JD Vance type. The few I met who were commissioned officers were fucking feral and had nothing good to say about the right.

                Remember the split in the veterans will be based broadly on education similar to the general public. And frankly speaking the actual folks at the Pentagon are pretty well educated.

                Also I will happily admit that this is me hoping for a somewhat workable scenario. Im Californian which means I am in the perfectly cooked chicken zone of this soon to be nuclear blast, watching a bunch of mush brained dipshits play with the nuke. I practically cant do fuck all.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            05 hours ago

            Honestly a good amount of that shit is of questionable function, reminder most of the good shit is going to the national guard first. The police are at best using old ass NVG and optics, maybe they have a functional IFV but itll be of questionable maintenance. My local police department gave up and just has the Sheriff department do anything that requires more than a rifle, mostly cause the mechanics refused to work on the humvee they got.

            Also the police arent exactly trained for an actual resistance movement, itll be likely a more embarrassing version of the union and county wars.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                33 hours ago

                Honestly fhe worst that can happen is the engine decides its in fact a fire pit. Otherwise it will just be a boring ass breakdown, transmission failure is pretty common in military vehicles as a general rule. Reminder the US military is a logistics network with an army meaning that just cause they can keep a vehicle running doesnt mean even the oversized budget of LAPD can.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11311 hours ago

    registered sex offender status for educators distributing it

    If a book in your classroom or school library has anything beyond a heterosexual peck on the cheek, congratulations, you’re now a sex offender. Not a joke.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5311 hours ago

      Oh boy, I can’t wait for abstinance to be taught as the only form of sexual education in America.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 hours ago

        That was mine… In the early 00s. And again with a guest speaker… In my advanced marketing class… In the late 00s. I will never forget how that lady sat on a desk, explaining with vivid, passionate excitement and lust, how waiting for your life partner to be your first time is, moans and quivers, so good~

        The fuck, Smith, I thought we were going to fuck around and watch movies while you go “make some copies” only to never return, like every other day. The fuck is this shit. Even your own kid in this class is visibly distraught and confused. Poor guy is fucking scarred for life.

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 hours ago

        In my school in the Bible belt that was primarily what they focused on. I don’t remember much time being given to condoms. I certainly don’t remember ever being given one or shown how to use it (not that it’s that difficult or anything, but still).

        But what I do remember is a speaker coming to our school to talk to us about how he had sex outside of marriage and got a girl pregnant, but he did the right thing and got married. Also, and I cannot stress this enough, he described this as abstaining because he married the person he had sex with.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1810 hours ago

          When the schools close, I guess everybody has to go to Christian school now! No sex education at all, please!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1310 hours ago

      Well fuck as a published writer who has gsy characters in my books does that mean I will be labeled under this?

      • Diplomjodler
        link
        fedilink
        148 hours ago

        Absolutely. The handmaids will rip you to pieces in a public execution.

  • babybus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2410 hours ago

    We’re back to 1920s. Mafia will bootleg porn from Mexico and Canada.

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      fedilink
      158 hours ago

      And of course they will use it as an excuse to implement complete surveillance on all your devices.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2710 hours ago

    Least important effect of a Trump presidency - but I’m sure if he did this it’d be the straw that broke the camel’s back for Gen Z Trumpers.

    • socsa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 hours ago

      Nah, genZ are apparently prudes. They have less sex and apparently don’t like fan service in media. Puritanism and teetotaling is the new counterculture.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 hours ago

        Nope, still pretty unimportant.

        I’m pretty sex positive and pro-porn myself but compared to deporting legal immigrants with the wrong skin color or forcing motherhood on unconsenting women it’s pretty unimportant.

        Also like… destroying our entire government bureaucracy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      218 hours ago

      The one thing this election has all but confirmed for me is that over half of the country supports these things unabashedly, and I highly doubt porn will be the hero that magically changes these people. It’s already banned in multiple conservative states, and all of them just voted red again.

      Honestly, I believe that if the Trump admin brought back prohibition, his bootlickers would be the first in line telling us how it’s the best idea ever.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          46 hours ago

          He wouldn’t do it. There’s too much money being made there to already wealthy people that support him. I could see him threatening and blackmailing to get a piece of the pie though.

    • Billiam
      link
      fedilink
      218 hours ago

      Then maybe they should have known that Project 2025 called for that before they decided to vote for Trump.

      Violence against women is about to skyrocket when the incels can’t get a date because they’re too repulsive and can’t watch porn to take out their sexual frustrations because of what they voted for.

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        208 hours ago

        Then maybe they should have known that Project 2025 called for that before they decided to vote for Trump.

        Those kids would be very angry if they could read

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3312 hours ago

    Hilarious. As if this could ever actually be instituted nationwide. Regulations on sale and access maybe, but moral crusades like this are perpetually doomed to failure, much like the War on Drugs.

    Doesn’t mean they won’t try, won’t posture, won’t grandstand about it, but to actually succeed in this goal when over 50% of the populace isn’t going to be behind it? I guess we’ll just have to watch them try.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The war on drugs only failed if you truly believe its goal was getting rid of drugs.

      To quote John Erlichman, one of its architects:

      “The Nixon Campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar Left, and Black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black. But by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

      By the strandards of what it was created to do, the war on drugs was fantastically successful.

      The war on porn will be successful in exactly the same way, because Republicans have already spent decades redefining all LGBTQ content as “pornographic”. This is will be a tool for disrupting queer and trans communities, for erasing queer and trans resources and tearing down queer and trans rights activists. Stopping porn isn’t the point, and it never was.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      No, but they can go after the owners and operators of major porn sites and have them shut down (and possibly executing them). Then the subsequent chilling effect that will occur, making sure nobody dares try to take their place.

      You could probably use a VPN and find stuff, but say goodbye to pornhub, youporn, xvideos, etc. And in certain states they will probably make accessing it illegal (or simply using a VPN at all. And no, it will not matter that they’re legitimately needed for all sorts of legal shit, it’ll be used at the government’s discretion (which means singling out people who are using it to access porn. Until it isn’t, and they use it for whatever they want because they are the law).

      This is what fascism is. People really don’t seem to grasp this. We need to stop viewing he world from this current paradigm, because come January 20, this nation will become unrecognizable.

    • fadingembers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 hours ago

      They don’t care about total enforcement. They’ll just use it against their enemies and people they want to take down while protecting their own. Rules for thee etc

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 hours ago

        This is what people don’t seem to grasp about fascism… It doesn’t matter. None of the rules or social mores that you’ve known since you were born will matter anymore.

        People need to read some history books, this has happened before. We aren’t special, it is already happening here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 hours ago

      Strange comparison. The war on drugs wrecked so many lives, and hasn’t really ended, just cooled off a little. I don’t see that as a cause for optimism.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26 hours ago

        It’s meant as a comparison in terms of Moral Crusades via Prohibition tactics. I have a feeling that a “ban” on pornography will likely end the same way, with hyperbolic responses and lives disrupted to no positive resolutions. But it really seems untenable as a concept, that genie is so far out of the bottle that there is no bottle anymore; only the whole entire internet

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7811 hours ago

      It’s not to try and ban porn

      It’s a way to snoop on all Internet traffic.

      Like cops “smelling weed” anytime they want to hassle someone. If they don’t like a person, they’ll spy on their Internet usage, obviously find some kind of porn, and then make a public spectacle out of to distract from what they’re mad at that person for.

      They don’t care about the crime, they want an excuse to investigate people they don’t like.

      Say something mean on twitter, and they’ll search your IP till they find something they can call porn.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        They’ll say they’re gonna ban it and when there’s uproar they’ll say to “protect the kids” you need a digital ID to access porn. Then they’ll expand it to everything, ban VPN’s, encryption and there will be no more privacy. Big brother is watching, and if he deems you too woke, for whatever arbitrary reason, you’re off to the gulag.

        • HeadfullofSoup
          link
          fedilink
          1510 hours ago

          Sadly people won’t react before it’s too late because " it will never happen here ! " and till then we think like that because “conspiration”

          • skulblaka
            link
            fedilink
            36 hours ago

            First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out…

          • Billiam
            link
            fedilink
            12
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Every fascist takeover starts with “Oh, you’re just overreacting.”

            Everyone, remember these six words:

            HE SAID HE WAS GOING TO.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1610 hours ago

        It’s also the pretext for a pogrom against LGBTQ, whose existence in public will be redefined as “pornographic.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          45 hours ago

          And to be clear, this isn’t supposition, it’s already literally happening in Florida.

          Florida is the model for what they want to do everywhere.