The new law that bans gender-affirming care for minors also mandates that adult patients seeking trans health care sign an informed consent form. It also requires a physician to oversee any health care related to transitioning, and for people to see that doctor in person. Those rules have proven particularly onerous because many people received care from nurse practitioners and used telehealth. The law also made it a crime to violate the new requirements.

Another new law that allows doctors and pharmacists to refuse to treat transgender people further limits their options.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1411 months ago

    What healthcare is given to children that you disagree with? Because most prominent medical organizations disagree with you about what we currently offer, which is gender-affirming care and puberty blockers. There’s nothing surgical and nothing permanent.

    I’m not really sure what you find needing limits to children there? Please explain.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -811 months ago

      This is a lie.

      There are permanent effects to puberty blockers and the FDA has issued serious warnings.

      Why do you care more about your ideology than protecting kids?

      Why can’t you just be honest?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        They’ve been in use since I was a child, so like 20 years ago at least, and were often used to delay puberty when it started abnormally early for a child. They’re perfectly fine.

        • ThePalmtopTiger
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          If we want to talk specifically about the drug transphobes shit their pants over, Lupron, it has been in use since the mid-80s. And studies have shown that Lupron as well as other puberty blockers are, by and large, safe for kids. We have like 40 years of data on this.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          Using them for that purpose is fine.

          Using them to hold back puberty in children who believe they are trans has SEVERE medical repercussions.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            That’s only possible if there’s a physiological difference between someone trans and someone who isn’t trans, that’s present without any treatment. If trans people are distinctly different physiologically with all other things equal, that confirms the need for medicine and treatment. Your argument is still defeating.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        You can stop taking puberty blockers and then, unsurprisingly, go through puberty with very minimal side effects. This has been shown through peer reviewed studies to vastly improve the well-being of trans children.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Lol did my original comment get removed?

          If you stop taking them later in life you will not go through puberty. Therefore it is misleading to say there are no side effects.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          The side effects are not “minimal”

          They are minimal to you because you are minimising them and that is dangerous. At least be honest.

          The FDA has issued warnings against them for brain swelling and severe bone density issues.

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 months ago

          And they would be correct to do so. Spreading misinformation in support of bigoted policy is bigotry.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Please explain why you think you know better than most medical organizations in fields of their expertise.