• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        And changed the twitter ToS to require suits in a specific part of texas.

        Elon Musk’s X updated its terms of service to steer user lawsuits to US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the same court where a judge who bought Tesla stock is overseeing an X lawsuit against the nonprofit Media Matters for America.

        The new terms that apply to users of the X social network say that all disputes related to the terms “will be brought exclusively in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas or state courts located in Tarrant County, Texas, United States, and you consent to personal jurisdiction in those forums and waive any objection as to inconvenient forum.”

        X recently moved its headquarters from San Francisco to Texas, but the new headquarters are not in the Northern District or Tarrant County. X’s headquarters are in Bastrop, the county seat of Bastrop County, which is served by US District Court for the Western District of Texas.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          English
          731 month ago

          Amazing how terms of service apparently carry the same weight as laws, yet can be changed arbitrarily by businesses on a whim.

        • @Good_morning
          link
          English
          61 month ago

          How likely is that chunk to be thrown out for being obviously ridiculous?

          • skulblaka
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 month ago

            In a past life, pretty plausible.

            Now that Elmo is the First Lady, this is the best TOS that’s ever been written by anyone ever. It’s perfect. It probably trumps the constitution because of how perfect it is.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 month ago

            According to the article, not that likely:

            Terms requiring users to sue in specific courts are usually enforceable, Vanderbilt Law School Professor Brian Fitzpatrick told Ars today. “There might be an argument that there was no consent to the new terms, but if you have to click on something at some point acknowledging you read the new terms, consent will probably be found,” he told us in an email.

            A user attempting to sue X in a different state or district probably wouldn’t get very far. “If a suit was filed in the wrong court, it would be dismissed (if filed in state court) or transferred (if filed in federal court),” Fitzpatrick said.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          So we’re just going past the line of obviously corrupt without batting an eye? They even tell us now. Written. Legally binding.

    • MentalEdge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      561 month ago

      There are. In most states.

      He’s having the suits filed specifically in one of the few states that don’t.