• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -21 year ago

    Yeah because the majority of blacks use reddit and ebony porn sites. So do you call them ebonies?

    • Pyff Daddy
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Not exactly sure what you’re asking, but no, collective nouns aren’t generally pluralized in English, nor is the term appropriate outside of a porn context. Are you a native English speaker?

        • Pyff Daddy
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          It’s far more acceptable than “blacks”. It also avoids the issue of associating general search terms for groups of people with sexualized contexts as has unfortunately been done to Asian women and others.

            • Pyff Daddy
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Brazilian isn’t a race, and Black isn’t a nationality. Incredibly, it’s even possible to be both. I hope your confusion has been cleared up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        Blacks and whites. Indians and Asians. Look, it’s plural. Add an S, guess it’s dehumanizing? I think the term daddy is dehumanizing. Please, only use dad. Do not add another dy.

        • Pyff Daddy
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, generally referring to groups of people as pluralized adjectives is considered dehumanizing.

          Note that Blacks and the Blacks are both considered offensive and should not be used. Black people is the preferred plural form of Black.

          https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/lcdrg/appendix/black-person

          [A]im to use Black as an adjective, not a noun. Also, when describing a group, use Black people instead of just “Blacks.”

          https://nabjonline.org/news-media-center/styleguide/#styleguidea

          This is for the exact same reason you would not refer to a singular Black person as “a black”. If you still have trouble perceiving the issue, consider how jarring the term “a gay” would seem in print.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            I didn’t say “a black”, context matters no? Everyone thought saying Indian was offensive and came up with native American, until realizing that is more offensive? Just because it’s plural doesn’t make it dehumanizing. Black people says blacks, I don’t hear them say a group of black people.

            • Pyff Daddy
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Are you under the impression that race and nationality are equivalent? If you’re asking whether the term is considered dehumanizing, that’s been answered for you, and if you’re asking why, that’s been answered as well. In English, racial and ethnic terms are generally used as adjectives, and we don’t use these adjectives as nouns when referring to groups of people.

                • Pyff Daddy
                  link
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Exactly, and only one fucking opinion matters. That of the people affected. Glad we cleared that up, cheers.