• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    7 days ago
    1. Claim to be anti-genocide,
    2. Act in a way that increase genocide,
    3. Accuse others of being pro-genocide,
    4. Revel in moral superiority

    chef’s kiss

    • @Fedegenerate
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Now you’re getting it. A genuine moment of self reflection on Lemmy.

      1 claims to be anti-genocide.

      2 votes for a pro-genocide party.

      3 “war is peace” any vote for non-genocide is actually a vote for pro-genocide Orwellian nonsense.

      4 posits purity test they cant pass themselves.

      You summarised them perfectly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        17 days ago

        Indeed! The actual consequences of (in)actions are unimportant so long as claimed intentions are pure…

        • @Fedegenerate
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          “I really wish people would stop judging me for being part of the ‘Pro-Genocide Club’ [actual consequences of my (In)action], I’M not pro-genocide! [My intention were pure]”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17 days ago

            Of course! Increasing genocide is of little consequence compared with suffering people’s judgment. Glad we share priorities

            • @Fedegenerate
              link
              English
              17 days ago

              I don’t know what to tell you if you can’t see the brazen hypocrisy.

              Here’s my entire premise: if you’re going to be setting purity checks, make sure you pass them first. That’s it, you can try distract with “others fail it worse” all you want, but it’s just a distraction. I’ll try keep you on track though:

              Pug chose both to support genocide and be judged for their failure of attempt at moral superiority. Stop defending them, you’re only making Pug look worse.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                27 days ago

                Interesting. Genuinely, thanks for your reply— I’m beginning to think there’s been some sort of misunderstanding (likely on my part). I definitely was not defending Pug’s comment…

                • @Fedegenerate
                  link
                  English
                  27 days ago

                  Nah, I’m a terrible communicator at the best of times. Worse this is a heated topic where revelations come after the fact if at all.