@[email protected] to Comic [email protected] • 1 day agoMeh, not my typelemmy.worldmessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1836
arrow-up1836imageMeh, not my typelemmy.world@[email protected] to Comic [email protected] • 1 day agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•21 hours ago0 seems a bit too indistinguishable from O, but otherwise I’m also a big fan of the numbers.
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍linkfedilink2•8 hours agoI think the font heavily reuses glyphs. 0 probably literally is the same glyph as O. I’m positive 9 is just a rotated 6 (I guess that’s pretty common, although it’s really obvious in Poiret).
0 seems a bit too indistinguishable from O, but otherwise I’m also a big fan of the numbers.
I think the font heavily reuses glyphs. 0 probably literally is the same glyph as O. I’m positive 9 is just a rotated 6 (I guess that’s pretty common, although it’s really obvious in Poiret).