- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Summary
Donald Trump criticized Panama Canal fees as “ridiculous” and demanded lower costs or the canal’s return to the US.
In a Truth Social post, Trump also expressed concern about potential Chinese influence over the waterway, despite no direct Chinese control of canal operations.
The canal, transferred to Panama in 1999, is vital for global trade, handling 5% of maritime traffic.
Trump’s comments follow record revenues of $5 billion announced by the Panama Canal Authority. Panama has not yet responded to his statements.
It’s about trump threatening panama, is that not US politics to you?
The main focus here is clearly the US, panama is just the subject.
No, by definition it is international politics.
What would US politics be, then?
This is about the US, and its diplomacy with panama. It is not, by definition, international politics. The US and trump, as i said, are clearly the focus in this article. If it was vice versa, ie, X country interacting with the US, for example, it would be passable. This is US internal politics.
Why couldn’t have this been posted to a US news community? why this of all places?
Yes by definition the diplomacy between two Nations is International politics. If it was internal us politics then it would be United States politics. I’m not sure what’s complicated about this, it’s common sense.
Of course it could also be posted to a US News community. It could also be posted to a Panama news Community I suppose. Sometimes posts are appropriate more than one community.
On second thought, yeah, you’re probably right. I’m just really tired of hearing about trump, and my comments were a knee jerk reaction. Sorry.
It’s so unfortunate that any of his big moves have international consequences. I don’t want the world to suffer from our mistakes but that’s the way it is.
As an American, so am I.
deleted by creator
By your own logic, that wouldn’t be international news - it would be x country news and shouldn’t be posted here either. Why would it be “passable” if the news was about another country doing it?
When Trump starts threatening to glass the EU with ICBMs, would that be US news only and not international? After all, it would be about the US and its arsenal of nuclear weapons.
That was probably a bad definition, sorry. I’m just tired of hearing of US news. But yeah, i would agree that the example would be international news.
I totally get it, I live in the US and I’m so goddamn sick of hearing about this nonsense. The worst part for everybody else is how much money is in the US economy, which means that basically everything we do affects the world and is therefore international/world news.
One of the first things he’s going to do is increase taxes on the poor and what’s left of the middle class and give tax breaks to the rich and corporations. Even that is world news in my opinion just because of the US status as pretty much the only world superpower. My country spends more on the military than the rest of the top 10 combined.
Don’t forget that about half of those countries are also our allies (at least for a few months longer).
Yeah, same. and probably hearing trump’s name all the time will make you easily annoyed by hearing the word “US”.
This does seem important globally. We know from history, and this shows he’s starting again from before he matters, that US diplomacy will be threaten first. Unfortunately this what y’all have to look forward to as our way of doing business, with allies, independents, and competitors
When one country’s (soon to be) leader directly threatens another country, this is by definition “international”.
I agree that Trump is getting far more attention that a person like him deserves, but him being the next head of a major nation makes him impossible to completely ignore.
Yup, as i said in another comment, i’ve changed my mind. I just really am annoyed of hearing of trump all the time, and made this comment.