• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    119 hours ago

    I doubt any of those movies are currently more known than Oppenheimer. The listed movies have James Woods participating as an actor. Whereas with Oppenheimer, James was bankrolling it. Executive producers can have more influence than producers. It depends whether they decide to be hands-on or only see the movie as an investment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      812 hours ago

      Oppenheimer may be well known, but I don’t know if anybody had any idea it was produced by James Woods. He’s not known for that movie by any stretch.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1819 hours ago

      You can see right there in the IMDB screenshot they use the same language you did (“known for”). I think IMDB has their finger on the pulse of how people talk about entertainment. Many people in the movie industry are most known for things from years ago but still work frequently. Like would you say Christopher Lloyd is most known for whatever semi-popular thing from the last couple of years he had a role in, or Back to the Future?

      You are right that EP’s vary in involvement, but even if I had known he was EP in that film, I still would’ve had the same question I originally asked.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 hours ago

        Anybody who thinks Christopher Loyd’s legacy is from The Mandelorian needs an iPadless TimeOut.

    • @Hawk
      link
      English
      414 hours ago

      Nah Hercules is a classic!