Jury nullification and Luigi Mangione’s murder defense | CNN
amp-cnn-com.cdn.ampproject.org
  • @[email protected]
    9•6 hours ago

    If the cops were that smart they would’ve found the guy instead of a McDonald’s worker. Saying that just because they arrested someone that they have to be guilty doesn’t sound right either.

    • @RedditRefugee69English
      4•6 hours ago

      Since when did we start defining intelligence as “being everywhere and observing everything?”

    • SkeezixEnglish
      2•6 hours ago

      It’s not “guilty because he was arrested”, he was arrested due to evidence found that implicated him. Smart or dumb, cops cant be everywhere at all times.

      There is too much sunlight and scrutiny on this case for the prosecutors to put forth a patsy. The last thing any prosecutor would want is for this case, especially this case, to turn into an OJ Simpson farce. Rest assured the evidence presented against the defendant will be iron clad. It will involve dna and video captures. It will be very difficult for an objective person to deny he did it.

      It is quite possible to approve what he did and at the same time recognise his guilt. You need not be conflicted about that.

      • @[email protected]
        2•5 hours ago

        I’m not sure if there would be any DNA as the guy was shot, not stabbed. As far as I understand most if not all of what they have is either grainy video snapshots or circumstantial evidence.