Le gem!

Literally this right here.

“I don’t doubt you’re good with technology, but I doubt you’re good with technology.”

I think it’s be more of a nibble than a chomp.

“Oops, we built a bit outside our perimeter due to a special military operation. It’s not an act of war so need for Article 5, right?”

No, I doubt that was part of the military conversation with the commander of the Greenland base.

When I was an American I shit myself.

Why does she show up as LibLeft on political compasses if she’s so Reagan?

I imagine it’s “Expand the base whether Denmark agrees or not.”

Thank you!

So does everyone else; they have zero customers.

Trump is saying both?

Is this an AI generated error?

Don’t trans people hate trains too?

Then whoever designed the anti bot measures in your scenario screwed up, but that doesn’t make captchas bad.

Seat-belts occasionally kill people when they break, but they’re still good as a general rule.

It’s not legal for congress to insider trade any more than it’s legal for you to speed.

Just because a lot of people do it and it’s not enforced enough doesn’t make it legal.

Hot take:

I don’t care about that.

It takes me five to thirty seconds (depending on how clean my browser and IP are) and it helps train self driving cars, which will eventually take shitty drivers off the roads and save lives.

I’ve spent more time on Sudoku puzzles and they’re not objectively any more entertaining than clicking on traffic signals.

Based on the recently circulated video of him bragging about how much money his inner circle made by buying the dip before he announced the tarrif pause, it seems not all rich people were left in the dark.

I’m not informed enough on the finer points of market manipulation law, but it certainly quacks like a duck.

?

A certain group of people care about literally nothing other than Line Go Up.

Line did not go up, therefore they want blood.

Who?

I’m starting to think that proposal may not have been modest after all.

Spammy?