• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1415 hours ago

      The Trump-Vance transition said in a press release that the portraits “go hard”.

      JFC I hate this timeline.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        910 hours ago

        Vance looks like a dip shit. Trump’s photo is quite hard though, not going to lie. It looks like the photo of the corrupt evil dictator of a dystopian revolution movie.

        Oh wait…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        59 hours ago

        In the grand scheme of things, they deserve what they got. But as a trained photographer, whoever did the lighting for these portraits did a terrible job. The fill and hair lights are okay (although the color temperature is all over the place, and doesn’t look like it’s an intentionally artistic choice), but the key light is way too bright. Looks like they somewhat masked it for Trump’s but may have just used the barndoors on the light so there’s a very dark shadow on his chest. With Vance they opened them up a bit, but he’s still got a weird shadow line from his right shoulder to his left elbow. They’d probably have gotten better pictures if they went to a JCPenney.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 hours ago

        That background is a mess. Why so many lines intersecting his right side? Is there any symbolism to that painting?

    • [email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      141 day ago

      Vance’s seems fine, aside from the lighting and juxtaposition making him look like a background character. It’s troubling that they both look like goobers while they attempt to look menacing. The US is already menacing. The president is meant to look friendly to exemplify the “walk softly but carry a big stick” style of diplomacy. They’re both trying far too hard.