It’s against the rules of lemmy.world to call for violence against insurance companies, and the people who work for them, so I won’t. But I don’t think it’s against the rules to imply I would if that wasn’t in the rules.
I’m surprised to see this comment and the amount of upvotes.
Doesn’t this break the PC bubble, where every person who works a mediocre job is a good person and no matter how disgusting the company is, you should never take your frustration out on them, yada yada yada.
But if it’s an insurance company it’s okay to commit violence?
Yup, thats it. People are literally saying that its okay to commit violence against anyone who works for any kind of insurance company. Even the cleaners of a home insurance firm.
Eeeeehhh… depends on negative individual impact on society and personal gain? I think the barely surviving insurance Employee should never be the target, what are you implying here? Have the insurance office shootings already taken over the school shootings? What meta level of could should have we reached to Dodge the ban?
It’s against the rules of lemmy.world to call for violence against insurance companies, and the people who work for them, so I won’t. But I don’t think it’s against the rules to imply I would if that wasn’t in the rules.
I’m surprised to see this comment and the amount of upvotes.
Doesn’t this break the PC bubble, where every person who works a mediocre job is a good person and no matter how disgusting the company is, you should never take your frustration out on them, yada yada yada.
But if it’s an insurance company it’s okay to commit violence?
Yup, thats it. People are literally saying that its okay to commit violence against anyone who works for any kind of insurance company. Even the cleaners of a home insurance firm.
Well done you for understanding the situation.
I have no idea what you’re talking about. I don’t think anyone has advocated violence here, have they? That’s certainly not in my comment.
Different people
I believe a revolution that is gained through blood is doomed to become oppressive
Look at China for instance
Other people disagree and feel change cannot happen without violence
France would certainly disagree with that statement.
France had a pretty rough go of things before Napoleon was elected
Then had another rough go of things until Napoleon III died and they abolished the monarchy
Eeeeehhh… depends on negative individual impact on society and personal gain? I think the barely surviving insurance Employee should never be the target, what are you implying here? Have the insurance office shootings already taken over the school shootings? What meta level of could should have we reached to Dodge the ban?
It’s not against the rules to imply that the rules should be different.
Unfortunately it’s the jurisdiction that they operate under that enforce some of those rules.
Because of the implication?