Brought to you by the Department of Erasing History.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Not surprising. They archive information that powerful people would rather we forget monetise.

      FTFY

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        817 months ago

        It’s both. I’m sure Puff Daddy, and R Kelly would rather we forget all the horrible things they’ve done rather than make money off of it. At the same time the NYTimes and the Atlantic would love to make money off their articles about those two people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      427 months ago

      I doubt this has to do with “powerful people”. A DDOS attack does not remove anything from the net, but only makes it temporarily hard to reach.

      There are firms that specialize in suppressing information on the net. They use SEO tricks to get sites down-ranked, as well as (potentially fraudulent) copyright and GDPR request.

      There must be any number of “little guys” who hate the Internet Archive. They scrape copyrighted stuff and personal data “without consent” and even disregard robots.txt. Lemmy is full of people who think that people should go to jail for that sort of thing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2867 months ago

    I was briefly able to get to https://archive.org/donate - I’m going to kick them a few bucks and recommend anyone else who can afford to also do so.

    There’s also this, copied verbatim from the site:

    Other ways to donate Mail your donation to:
Internet Archive
C/O Philanthropy Department
300 Funston Avenue
San Francisco, CA  94118-2116

    In order to ensure you receive an acknowledgement of your gift as quickly as possible, please include an email address with your mailed donation. We regret that we cannot accept cash or check donations in currencies other than USD.

    Stock or Wire Transfer:
If you would like to make a stock or wire transfer gift, please contact us at [email protected]

    I say we go full Streisand effect on whatever dickhead is trying to censor them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        407 months ago

        Reddit used to show downvotes, sort by controversial, and hide by variable net downvote totals.

        Then someone in admin decided it wasn’t good for business, so all the features got phased out.

        • Dizzy Devil Ducky
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Unless it’s a setting I missed, same with Voyager.

          Edit: I am as dumb as a bag of rocks. Couple comments down the chain and someone pointed out it’s a feature on Voyager.

      • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        Reddit also has vote fuzzing where you can get the number of votes, but it’s always manipulated for some reason.

        I don’t understand the point, and tbh it’s a serious case of social media mind fuckery. It’s a real problem for anyone who creates an incredibly specific subreddit for use by a group and then everyone is left wondering who keeps downvoting them. That can have real life consequences for anyone who doesn’t understand what is happening.

    • LeadersAtWork
      link
      fedilink
      English
      307 months ago

      @dogsnest Thanks for the heads up.

      OP thanks for posting this.

      Donated what little I could. Free access to information is absolutely one of the most important things we as a collective can support.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          207 months ago

          Nobody (worth caring about) would look down on you for not being in a situation to donate.

          Besides, there are lots of ways to help that don’t cost money, like telling people who do have money that they can donate to the internet archive. Equally valid effort.

  • Nziom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1797 months ago

    Why out of all sites why internet archive

      • Nziom
        link
        fedilink
        English
        357 months ago

        Luckily non of the data was deleted

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          277 months ago

          It might be that someone wanted to change something that was on a website before the archive could get to it too.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            347 months ago

            That’s a ridiculous amount of effort to go through to slow down a scraper for one site, especially when that site could just be… turned off.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Then it still makes no sense, as you being unable to take down the content means you also very likely can’t edit the content. I can’t think of a situation where you:

                1. Need content to not be scraped
                2. Need time to remove/edit that content
                3. Have access to do the above
                4. Don’t have access to pull the content immediately
                5. Have control of a large enough botnet to take down Internet Archive
                6. Don’t have a big enough botnet to take down the aforementioned content
                • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  On an individual level, having a massive archive of everything you’ve ever posted isn’t always a good thing, especially when mentally ill people will quote mine a single post and then try to misuse it.

      • Nziom
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        But they have back up to the entire thing am pretty sure any change would be detectable if a dictator is behind this then he’s extremely stupid

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      277 months ago

      They’re storing proof of my fuck up which I fixed but if anyone looks it up I’m cooked

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1387 months ago

    I very rarely go to the internet archive, but the moment I needed to get a safe copy of very old software, shitty people decided to DDOS it. shitty humans. find better hobbies losers

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1157 months ago

    I was wondering what was going on. The Internet Archive is an incredibly important asset beyond archiving websites because it has things like the Prelinger Collection, which is the largest archive of industrial, educational and other ephemeral films, which would be only accessible via commercial sites like YouTube otherwise.

    And that’s really the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the audio, video and texts available.

    I hope this gets resolved soon.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        267 months ago

        Oh wait you can do that? Damn I feel like an idiot now… I have 100% accidentally downvoted without realizing it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          47 months ago

          I set the downvote gesture to reply instead, which I’ll definitely notice if I do it by mistake.

      • 🐍🩶🐢
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        I know right? It sucks having a curved screen with a case as it pushes my thumb in the exact worst spot on the side of the screen. I accidentally do things all the time. I rest my thumb on the case edge to try and avoid it, but if I barely tilt, it touches the oversensitive touchscreen. First world problems.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      307 months ago

      Sometimes people miss-tap while scrolling. Also, on kbin at least, you can who downvote things if they’re on kbin. I think if you run your own instance, as an admin you can see who as well?

      • Dojan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        This is definitely something that has to be thought about in terms of UI/UX design. I recently developed a Outlook calendar-esque interface, and we’ve had on-and-off discussions for a couple of hours about how we best implement a way to “click” an empty spot in the calendar to create an event there.

        I’m championing “we don’t on mobile, but use double-click on desktop.” I think I’m winning.

      • Melkath
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        I didn’t know know you could see who voted on kbin.

        I just knew lemmy, mbin, and some others don’t get counted, so the troll down boats don’t matter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      177 months ago

      Due to how federation works, downvotes are actually somewhat public because instance owners can query them in lemmy database, though instance owners probably won’t tell you if you ask due to privacy reason. If you’re interested in something like this, you can run your own instance.

      • Dark Arc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        137 months ago

        Yeah, it’s actually … a bit creepy.

        Federated voting in general seems like it could use some rethinking to enable private voting but also to protect against vote manipulation. Right now the fediverse is arguably incredibly vulnerable to vote manipulation campaigns.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          127 months ago

          Open (and distributed) and private are two very difficult things to intermingle. You can mitigate some issues, but at the end of the day the two ideas have to butt against each other.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              47 months ago

              Blockchains are the antithesis of anonymity. Pseudo anonymity isn’t anonymity, it just doesn’t scream your name out there from the get go.

            • capital
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 months ago

              What aspect of the points mentioned in the thread do you feel are addressed by blockchain?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Openly distributed while being private(-ish; I know blockchains aren’t truly private but it could at least obfuscate it adequately against casual or semi serious attempts to identify someone)

                I’ll admit I’m no expert or even particularly well versed in blockchain technologies, but my (limited) understanding of them suggests this might actually be the kind of thing it’s good at (as opposed to how it could seemingly do anything a few years ago and everyone was trying to shoehorn a blockchain into their products)

                And to underline part of my comment, I did say “I wonder if…” rather than asserting that it would work or even that I bet it would work

                • capital
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  27 months ago

                  Fedi technologies are already distributed. That’s literally what federation is about.

                  Blockchain isn’t private by default although some have gone that direction. Bitcoin, for example, is pseudonymous - all transactions are public to the world though no tx is tied to an identity on chain.

                  Any privacy features you’re imagining can be built for a blockchain solution to this problem could be built into a “normal”, web 2.0, federated solution that would be far less expensive to run, resource-wise.

                  It’s almost always the case that when someone comes up with blockchain as the solution to some problem, they mean distributed or maybe self-hosted. Neither of which requires a blockchain.

                  Check out videos involving crypto on the Cartoon Avatar’s youtube channel such as this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xq721IAqBo&t.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                27 months ago

                Yeah, I’d imagine not, though I’m fairly confident any solution to this would be nontrivial

                • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  Fair point. Blockchain might be the quickest to implement just because the infrastructure is already established, even if it’s not trivial. Not sure, though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          I want the ability to see who down votes what but don’t want to have other people see that about me. Ha

        • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          I was wondering about this. If they didn’t keep track of who is voting, manipulation would be easier then it already is. The problem is that rogue instance admins could make votes public.

          • Dark Arc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 months ago

            One possible answer is to allow anyone to see votes categorized by instance, so you know where they’re originating from.

            Small/single user instances could be aggregated together/anonymized or maybe that’s just the price you pay for having a single user instance.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        I think this is public information on some services. Not Lemmy, but other federated services.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    547 months ago

    The attack on the few remaining services that the “every person” openly benefits from is so disheartening.

    Not the save structure for org, but this feeling made be remember The Consumerist in it’s heyday and when it was bought and silenced effectively… you know kids, the internet used to be a thing that actually helped and supported us without the ready acceptance of 51% “hallucinations” in information. It was actual people, in small, quiet corners, that didn’t demand subscriptions and micro transactions at every turn. It wasn’t that long ago.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      Used to be, “the tragedy of the commons” didn’t quite so literally mean an attack on the common resources.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      287 months ago

      I’ll admit they have some powerful enemies, but I can’t imagine who specifically would be behind this. Maybe it’s not a conventional attack but some wealthy idiots trying to clone the archives to feed their dumb hobby.

      • @Good_morning
        link
        English
        217 months ago

        That gave me a thought, could be a group trying to scrape some older content for use in feeding an llm since reddit was obviously a bad choice.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 months ago

            Heavy traffic is different from a DDoS, assuming the attacker is using standard DDoS techniques (refusing connection after confirmation from server)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    177 months ago

    Damn. I guess this is why we can’t have nice things.

    I guess I’ll take this opportunity mention if one cannot make a monetary donation to IA. You can always help them out by help seed some of their torrents. I’d appreciate it at least :P

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 months ago

      I tried to seed the torrents but I never found anything that needed seeds, most users download via browser