Not my original content, but something I stand by

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3228 days ago

    I know it’s a joke, but why would a shapeshifter 350 years into the future on a planet 50 lightyears away be guilty of any of the same prejudices that our local cops are?

    • Malgas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4828 days ago

      Never ask:

      • A woman her age.

      • A man his salary.

      • Odo what he did during the Cardassian occupation of Bajor.

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3028 days ago

      “No cops at pride” is not about the prejudices of individual cops, be they fictional future shapeshifters from half a galaxy away, or real police here and now. There are LGBTQ+ cops out there.

      The issue is the fact that cops enforce the law regardless of how just the law might be. Odo was the chief of security aboard Terek Nor while it was under Cardassian control, and while in that role rushed three innocent Bajoran workers to execution so he could maintain order aboard the station.

      Even once the station became Bajoran owned and Starfleet operated, Odo was still willing to conduct illegal surveillance, lock people in the detention facility on trumped up charges, and impose a strict curfew. Personally I don’t think it would be too much of a stretch to assume that Odo would be willing to lock up people participating in a Pride event for no other reason than that he was told to do so, and they were causing a minor disruption on the Promenade.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1028 days ago

      Because when he was learning to live among humanoids, the rule of law provided a form of structure he could understand, and Odo has yet to surpass the cognitive development milestone of a 12 year old.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      60
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      In the US cops:

      • Take trans kids away from supportive parents in states with laws against that
      • Selectively target LGBT people for unequal enforcement of often unconstitutional laws (ex: obscenity laws)
      • Disproportionately use force against trans people (more than 1/4th according to the ACLU).

      Imagine how much it would fuck you up if a cop kicked you around, threw you in lockup with the wrong gender, and then you see the shit stain getting paid to be at Pride.

      And just being there, getting paid to do nothing is the best you can hope for. Plenty of times they just watch bigots harass or attack the people at Pride and either do nothing or arrest the victims.

      Cops who want to come to Pride out of uniform on their own time because they’re LGBT+ or whatever, most people don’t care about that.

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        More importantly, Pride itself a reference to the Stonewall Riots, in which cops brutally assaulted LGBTQ+ citizens with great malice and the citizens fought back.

        June 28th, 1969

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_riots

        The first Pride Parade was a year later, on June 27th, 1970

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pride_parade#First_pride_marches

        The reason cops shouldn’t be allowed at Pride is because cops violence against the LGBTQ+ community is why Pride fucking exists to begin with.

        • Transporter Room 3
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2028 days ago

          One of my friends from a local theater group I did some musicals with had a brick pin they wear to every pride event they attend.

          It’s my favorite pin ever.

      • macniel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2028 days ago

        Damn… US cops are really just the worst most of the time.

        • @Anyolduser
          link
          English
          828 days ago

          I’m gonna get eviscerated for saying this, but take what you hear here with a grain of salt.

          Lemmy doesn’t exactly reflect the experience of the average American.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            Counterpoint: “40 percent of the officers stated that in the last six months prior to the survey they had gotten out of control and behaved violently against their spouse and children.”

            And that’s just the ones who freely admit to being abusers. It doesn’t take a huge mental leap to realize that a position of authority with a low barrier of entry is a magnet to people who want to abuse that power.

            You can find the source for that survey, as well as the context here: https://sites.temple.edu/klugman/2020/07/20/do-40-of-police-families-experience-domestic-violence/

            • @Anyolduser
              link
              English
              628 days ago

              According to that link the study was conducted in 1983 and counts shouting as abuse.

                • @Anyolduser
                  link
                  English
                  123 days ago

                  You ever shout during an argument? Congratulations, you’re abusive now.

                  See how ridiculous that is?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          828 days ago

          It’s a bit of a general issue. The police in itself is good, however… it’s a job that puts people into a position of power. Power corrupts, and if you factor in that they’re not well paid (because tanks and so on are better ways to spend a budget…) but are supposed to put their lives on the line, then get treated either like the enemy or the “thin blue line” I see how things can go bad. Being a public service, they’re managed by the government and sent to deal with trouble accordingly, and the definition of trouble varies with whoever is at the top. Sprinkle in some dangerous levels of nationalism, the US being a super power and you most certainly get to hear about their unrest, while the stuff going on in your own country might be less flashy.

          A small trivia bit that you might or might not know: at the beginning there was this organization that was created to protect the people from abuses by local lords. Everyone knows what an unholy shitfest that got corrupted into, given that I’m talking about the mafia…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            728 days ago

            Police are not a net good when they are used instead of taking care of basic human needs. Police enforce eviction but never kneecap a housing scalper… I mean landlord.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        928 days ago

        Shower grade thought: whatever protest or manifestation proud boys might do, with firearms in plain view, nobody is going to even notice. Pride, BLM or similar if there’s guns for actual self defense rather than intimidation? How big of a bloodbath would it to turn into?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          428 days ago

          Congrats on seeing the autocorrect typo in the 10 seconds it took me to edit it out ;p Assuming it federated out properly anyway

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        226 days ago

        Thanks for adding that “in the US” bit because not all countries have shit for brain police

    • TotallyNotSpez
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5028 days ago

      Because they almost always act like pricks and they’ve got a rich history of oppressing and harrassing LGBTI people. That’s why.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Stonewall was a mafia bar that paid off the cops to leave their largely LGBTQ clients alone. The cops decided to ignore the agreement and harass the LGBTQ people there, and it turned into days of violence.

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Because the police enforce the laws of the state, often with violence. If the law dictates that a person being open about their identity is illegal regardless of the fact their identity harms no one, and everyone involved in their actions consents, than it is the responsibility of the cops to oppress them. One year the cops might march alongside people at pride, and then the laws might change and they’ll be there to bust heads of anyone who shows up the next year.

      And yeah, there no doubt exist LGBTQ+ cops, or cops whose friends and/or family whom they love are LGBTQ+, but so long as they wear the uniform they represent an organization used to oppress marginalized and minority communities.

      Fundamentally, pride is not just a party, it is a protest.

        • Gormadt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1328 days ago

          That rainbow brick goes hard

          Damn I’d love one of those

      • lad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1028 days ago

        Fundamentally, pride is not just a party, it is a protest.

        And people often tend to say “but why do they need the parade if we let them be?” Because otherwise it’ll be a couple of years before someone will start lynchings.

        I just hope the society will sometimes be free of fear for everyone

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2228 days ago

    Kira isn’t Starfleet, so that means she just grabbed Jadzia’s phaser and pointed it at someone!

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1628 days ago

      Because that’s what the artist decided to draw. Maybe Kira has it for someone she knows who identifies as a lesbian. Maybe she was just getting into the spirit of things and grabbed the first flag she saw.

      Obviously I’m canon Kira only expresses interest in dudes with the personalities of dry toast, but mirror Kira is a bit more open. It’s not entirely clear if sexual orientation is 1:1 across universes, so who’s to say if prime Kira experiences same sex attraction or not?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1028 days ago

        Serious observation, Prime Sulu is straight and Kelvin Sulu is gay (there was a whole brou ha ha about that with George Takei when Beyond came out). So there is a possibility of orientation deviation (heh) between timelines if they stray far enough from each other.

        In the case of the Mirror Universe, I think it’s strictly a “same exact people but in different situations” thing. Even while it was still on the air, I assumed Prime Kira was closeted and that was part of why none of her relationships worked out.

        • @[email protected]OPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1028 days ago

          Prime Sulu is straight and Kelvin Sulu is gay

          Do we know that prime Sulu is straight? He flirts with a woman in “The Way to Eden” and when the literal devil from Christen mythology is aboard the Enterprise in “The Magiks of Megas-Tu” Sulu is able to conjure a woman using the magical properties.

          Mirror Sulu clearly is interested in Uhura, despite her rebuffs.

          And we do see Kelvin Sulu ever so briefly with his husband and child in “Beyond”, causing an uproar well out of proportion to how little the movie choose to show.

          However, all those characters might be bisexual. We do exist.

          Even while it was still on the air, I assumed Prime Kira was closeted and that was part of why none of her relationships worked out.

          People have relationships that don’t work out without being queer.

          But yeah, prime Kira is a religious conservative who is grossed out by how libertine Dax is – dating Ferengi, and dudes with transparent skulls – and while we’re never told how Bajorans view queer relationships, I do view mirror Kira’s more unrestrained nature as indication that her prime counterpart is holding back a part of herself.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            728 days ago

            Yes, it was about being gay or straight. Kelvin Sulu was given a husband in honor of George Takei… an honor he rebuked because he felt they only changed the character for cheap representation points. He insisted that even though he is gay, the Sulu he portrayed is straight. (In Generations, Sulu is married and has a daughter, Demora, who helmed the Enterprise-B.)

            Personally, I feel like since John Cho’s Sulu is a different person in a different universe (and Cho himself is cool being a straight Korean playing a gay Japanese) Takei didn’t need to get so angry about it.

            We do exist.

            Please don’t assume that I thought otherwise just because I didn’t explicitly mention every potentiality in that one post.

            • @[email protected]OPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              428 days ago

              He insisted that even though he is gay, the Sulu he portrayed is straight.

              “Unfortunately, it’s a twisting of Gene’s creation, to which he put in so much thought. I think it’s really unfortunate.”

              Takei was not into it, but I do feel like he was overselling just how much thought Roddenberry put into the side characters in Trek. Sulu didn’t even get a given name until “The Voyage Home”, a film Roddenberry had nothing to do with.

              (In Generations, Sulu is married and has a daughter, Demora, who helmed the Enterprise-B.)

              Demora is Sulu’s daughter, but there’s no mention that Sulu was married, or if he was that it was to a woman.

              (and Cho himself is cool being a straight Korean playing a gay Japanese)

              Funny you mention the character’s nationality, considering that Roddenberry envisioned Sulu as some pan-Asian character on indeterminate nationality. Sulu is not a Japanese name, and Roddenberry chose to name the character after the Sulu sea of the coast of the Philippians.

              Please don’t assume that I thought otherwise just because I didn’t explicitly mention every potentiality in that one post.

              That was not my assumption. I just can’t think of any reason to assume that Sulu is not bi or pan, given what we know about the various iterations of the character.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          628 days ago

          Mirror Georgiou puts forward the same hypothesis in Discovery when she sexually harasses Stamets and his boytoy.

          And she’s right.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Not 100%, but I feel the author may just be engaging in some Kira/Dax shipping. Which wouldn’t jibe great with the canon, but when has that ever stopped a good ship?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        728 days ago

        Absolutely! The basic rainbow is good to show support regardless of orientation. You could do specific one(s) if you have people that identify as that, it just might require additional explanation.

  • Melllvar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1328 days ago

    What’s with these “no cops at Pride” comics?

      • Melllvar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Shouldn’t we be working against that, though? Isn’t that the whole point of Pride… AND TREK?

          • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
            link
            fedilink
            English
            226 days ago

            wellll… defund the police. Those are very different things. Taking money away from their protection and toys, for example, and putting it into training and non-police personal has been a major point of it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              126 days ago

              A policing force that were not fundamentally corrupt in the way police are, would necessarily be an all new organisation with all new people, and it would not be called the police. Abolish the police and replace them with something better.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                126 days ago

                If the new police, whatever you want to call them, have the power to enforce laws then they will be subject to all the same pressures as current police. Power corrupts!

                The fact remains though is that there’s a very large number of people in the US who want the police to commit the violence they have. They’re voting for the politicians who pass these laws.

        • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
          link
          fedilink
          English
          827 days ago

          neither the point of pride, nor the point of Trek, has anything to do with including your oppressors/keeping your enemies closer. Unless you think Cardassians were the point?

      • Melllvar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1228 days ago

        But that’s not the part I’m asking about.

              • Melllvar
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1128 days ago

                I’m obviously asking why no cops. I don’t believe you didn’t understand that. But clearly, you’re not willing to discuss it, so I’ll withdraw the question.

                • @[email protected]OPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1128 days ago

                  Ah, well that question has been answered by others and myself elsewhere in this thread. Sorry for assuming that you might have checked to see if your question was already answered before asking it.

                  But hey, just for you, I’ll repost what I’ve already said:

                  Because the police enforce the laws of the state, often with violence. If the law dictates that a person being open about their identity is illegal regardless of the fact their identity harms no one, and everyone involved in their actions consents, than it is the responsibility of the cops to oppress them. One year the cops might march alongside people at pride, and then the laws might change and they’ll be there to bust heads of anyone who shows up the next year. 
                   
                  And yeah, there no doubt exist LGBTQ+ cops, or cops whose friends and/or family whom they love are LGBTQ+, but so long as they wear the uniform they represent an organization used to oppress marginalized and minority communities. 
                   
                  Fundamentally, pride is not just a party, it is a protest.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  828 days ago

                  Cops are generally shitty people who don’t belong in any places where citizens express themselves.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      927 days ago

      LGBT+ people have learned not to trust the police, and so will have a hard time relaxing and enjoying themselves if they are around.

      Cops have motive, means and opportunity to abuse minorities they don’t “approve” of. Therefore (and because of previous form) they have made themselves unwelcome.

      • Melllvar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Thanks for your completely sincere suggestion, which I’m sure was made in a good faith effort to have a mature and intelligent discussion on this topic, but I’m actually very well versed in LGBT+ history already.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          527 days ago

          Oh, so you’re just trolling then, because I was answering honestly and you were asking in bad faith to be a troll.