People of lemmy, would you live in a rural area? Why or why not?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    621 year ago

    Grew up in the middle of nowhere. No bus. No shop. No pub. It was hell. Left home for the city at the first opportunity and will never go back. I don’t want to be dependent on a car ever again.

    • credit crazy
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Honestly I feel like I’m going in your direction just want from middle of nowhere Vermont to Florida for college and man its nice not having to pack water and food to bike 30 miles up and down mountains I’m still amazed by my determination as a kid to get anywhere on bike fr I continued doing that even after I got a car

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      That was my thought too. I’m guessing you’re American. Rural Americans are especially bigoted for some reason. I’ve been to rural areas in other countries and they’re not this bad. People openly stare at you in rural America if you’re not white.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not quite, but it’s very similar. I have an old friend that lived for a couple decades in a VERY progressive, urban area, recently moved closer to me in a smaller town, so I went to see him and, while we are definitely still friends, there were some very dangerous conversation topics covered (carbon climate, EVs which are easy to get me going on). It’s like a conservative brain worm infected him sometime in the past few months, very strange.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -91 year ago

          Could it be that he was finally exposed to alternative viewpoints after leaving, as you described it, a VERY progressive, urban area?

          I wouldn’t call that a brain worm. If anything, he probably made a correction toward center after leaving an area saturated in blue.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    371 year ago

    I would and do. It’s quiet and peaceful, I have forest all around me, no traffic, cost of living is lower.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    33
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Rural meaning wilderness, yes.

    Rural meaning farming communities, no.

    I currently live in a small city surrounded by wilderness. Transit could be better, but there’s tons of culture I can walk to and I can escape to solitude in 15 minutes and it’s divine.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    This weekend I’m going to PAX. Last week I saw Japanese Breakfast. Next week I’m seeing John Oliver do standup. Went to a Mariners game last week too. Got Sounders tix coming up, and hockey starts soon.

    Rural is nice for a weekend. Urban is where the action is.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    Absolutely. The beauty of nature is incredible, and being able to enjoy it is important to me. Not to mention there’s not as many people around to mess things up, make things loud/dirty, or be crowded by.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      Moving to a rural/secluded area has been the best thing ever for my mental health. My commute is gorgeous and there’s nothing better than waltzing around outside naked in the sunshine.

      • Dojan
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        there’s nothing better than waltzing around outside naked in the sunshine.

        Oh my goose. It’s been so long since I did this but this brought back memories.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    I do and have for most of my life. I lived on an island where my SO and I were the only permanent residents for 8 years.

    I have lived in the suburbs of a couple of large towns/small cities for some years too - and in the centre of an all-but-city and although there is some convenience in those, I’d choose rural any day. The peace, proximity to nature and the ease of getting out for enjoyable walks beats convenience every time for me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        A) - it wasn’t private - it was a nature reserve and I was the warden and B) - I kinda intended this in an “…and I EVEN lived on an island…” way.

  • diprount_tomato
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Just to clarify, I’m from a European country

    Nah, I’d rather just live in towns that are well connected to cities (like bus stops going to that city) while also having rural areas not too far from there

    • potpotato
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      In the US these would be suburbs that are shit holes of land management and zoning.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        agree, the problem with the US equivalent how is much less walkable is, everything planned far appart, without sidewalks or bicycle lanes

  • FartsWithAnAccent
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    There are a lot of aspects of it that really appeal to me, but I’d miss the shit out of using a bicycle as my primary means of transportation and having everything relatively close.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      To be fair, this largely depends on the country you’re in. Appreciate that the bike is going to be pretty useless in somewhere as car-centric as the US, but I’ve lived in rural areas in the EU where the bike was quite enough.

      • FartsWithAnAccent
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I live in the US and my bike is my primary means of transportation, not rural though: When you get more remote, everything of significant distance is highways and it’d be super dangerous trying to ride a bike or even an ebike. You’d need a motorcycle at minimum.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Yes, sorry, that was the point I was making (albeit poorly). Rural US is an impossibility unless you have a car.

          • credit crazy
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Unless you’re a 15 year old me who just has a shit ton of stamina water bottles and a even more shit ton of determination to get to a city so I can throw myself around a roundabout

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -41 year ago

      What does traffic have to do with living in the city? You don’t drive when you live in the city, the traffic is from people in the suburbs coming into the city - you’re already here there’s no reason to drive. 

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Traffic has a lot to do with living in the city. I’m about 6 miles away from major destinations downtown. I mostly work remote, but when I go into the office, it’s about 7 miles away in one of the suburbs.

        “What about the bus?” you might ask. Well, around here that’s kind of a sick joke. It works OK for commuting – but it turns my 15 minute drive into an hour on the bus with at least one transfer. And what if I’m trying to go to a party that a friend is hosting in the suburbs? In many cases, I’d have to arrange to stay overnight because bus service to that area just stops until morning.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That very much depends on the city. I live in Los Angeles. It’s giant, and most people have to do quite a bit of driving. My personal commute is only 15 minutes by surface streets, but almost everyone I know has to take the freeways. My doctor is 15 miles, and traffic can change that from 20 minutes into an hour and a half.

      • NaN
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        So much walking, but in a good way. I used to work for the city doing IT work and would walk between most city buildings blocks apart, would put in like 7 miles a day.

        • synae[he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I live in a city (sf) and I’m usually walking or occasionally bus/train. Traffic rarely affects my day-to-day life.

          I think that’s the connection they’re pointing out, anyway - colored with my own experience of course.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Even for not drivers traffic is anoying. It’s loud and takes way to much space. I like living in the city, but in the last few years I got realy anti cars. They have nothing to do in cities. If you live in rural areas ofcourse you need one, but the second there is a good public transport grid cars shouldn’t be allowed to drive there.

            • synae[he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Oh by no means do I disagree.

              I meant- in a practical sense, my travel is not impeded by car traffic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    I live in a town of about 2000 people. It has a grocery, a liquor store, and a hardware store. It’s rural enough. I would never live anywhere I can’t walk to get a bag of chips. Rural sounds good until the power goes out in a snow storm and your lane way is 7 miles long and the plow guy ain’t coming.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    Contingent on fiber internet and having a four-wheeel-drive vehicle, yes.

    Snow’s a bitch and so is DSL. Other than that, the solitude would be rad.

  • ntzm [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    No, I’ve done it before. It’s awful being dependent on a car to go anywhere, there’s less to do.