• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2845 months ago

    shouldn’t the federal minimum wage apply to everyone who is doing work in the US? This seems like fraud

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        395 months ago

        That the neat thing, you don’t.

        Here, for certain industries (might be all but I don’t have first hand accounts of that), the contractors must make sure that the companies/freelancers they employ pay their taxes, otherwise, they are on the hook for it.

        Do the same. If a company outsource work, they should prove that they pay the same as they would in their region, and if it not, be hit hard by fines and/or jail time.

        But one can only dream I guess

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Should apply to that as well if they’re interacting with the US market. All the way through subcontractors to the end employee. No hiding behind contracting local companies.

        • polonius-rex
          link
          fedilink
          65 months ago

          i don’t like outsourcing either, but realistically the machine of capitalism isn’t going to allow you to be rid of it in its entirety

          honestly i don’t even know if getting rid of multinational organisations is on the whole a good thing, and that’s the only way i can see of getting rid of outsourcing

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            305 months ago

            Outsourcing entirely being gone isn’t realistic… But there’s a huge difference between moving an entire team of say developers to India and having a worker teleconference in to be a cashier. Anyone directly interacting with a customer or end user in any capacity should be paid the same as a local employee in the location they’re “working”.

            A Telecashier is fucking stupid and ridiculous.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              295 months ago

              Remember when we learned that Amazon’s “just put it in your cart to buy” algorithm was really just a bunch of people in India watching you shop on the store surveillance system? That was, like 3 months ago maybe??

            • polonius-rex
              link
              fedilink
              45 months ago

              yesssssss, but i don’t know how you’d make a legal distinction between those two

              then again i’m not a law talking guy so what do i know

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            135 months ago

            but realistically the machine of capitalism isn’t going to allow you to be rid of it in its entirety

            Who said anything about that? We’re just talking about putting tariffs on outsourced labor to correct for negative externalities.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      225 months ago

      $3 is loads more than the Philippines minimum wage. I think it’s $8-$10 per day.

      Also, y’all are thinking of what $3 buys in the US. The purchasing power is far different. $3 buys a lot over there.

      I’ll ask my wife when she gets home, but I bet $3 is equivalent to $10-$12 in the US.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        765 months ago

        Also, y’all are thinking of what $3 buys in the US. The purchasing power is far different. $3 buys a lot over there.

        You misunderstand. We aren’t unaware or ignoring the purchasing power difference, that’s obvious, everyone knows currency differs. The issue is and always has been the outsourcing to increase profit in general, regardless of country or purchasing disparity. There is no reason to use a teleconferenced cashier for a retail location other than minimizing employee pay, not just by paying the minimum required here but literally taking a local job and shipping it overseas so you can instead pay what would be a clear poverty wage here, while undoubtedly having record profits like all these companies end up with.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          So, there actually is a reason to do this beyond pay, but clearly pay is the actual reason they do it.

          A restaurant has a set amount of staff. What happens if a few are sick and they have trouble finding someone to fill in?

          A remote agent like this could be from a larger organization being contracted out and you’d never have to worry about not having someone to be available.

          Edit: 1 person could even be managing multiple stores where they queue the person to assist you as it detects you approaching. Less ideal would be ‘someone will be available in 45 seconds’ type queuing.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            255 months ago

            Or they just hire enough staff to run the business in the first place. Something that used to just be how you operated a business. If the business wants to gamble on regularly operating without enough employees to cover multiple sick calls then they need to deal with the results of that decision.

            Pull from other locations to cover, or God forbid, a manager actually covers a shift, or just close the location for a day if they cannot cover it. You know, what every business that operates with employees deals with.

            You’re making excuses and trying to find a justification for a fucking disgraceful, greedy choice by the owner of this business.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              No I’m not, you’re just jumping to conclusions. I clearly said it’s obviously about the pay.

              The actual idea has potential merit like it or not. It doesn’t have to be scummy. It could be a US based corporation that pays US employees the same or more than what they’d get paid to be there in person.

              The employee as I said could be managing more than 1 store, thus be providing more valuable work, and thus earning even more than they’d be earning at the restaurant, or 711, or wherever.

              And they could be doing it from the comfort of their home making for a happier employee.

              It just turns out that the way this has been implemented has been terrible and exploitative.

              Edit: it could even be numerous ipad based kiosks around a mall where you could talk to someone and ask questions about the mall, without having to find and go to the info booth that’s in a single spot (that could also have an actual person there for those that want that). There’d always be someone available since there’d be multiple people for multiple malls all trained on each mall.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          We aren’t unaware or ignoring the purchasing power difference, that’s obvious, everyone knows currency differs. The issue is and always has been the outsourcing to increase profit in general, regardless of country or purchasing disparity

          This makes it sound like your problem isn’t someone getting hurt; it’s someone doing well.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Everyone complains about small businesses being driven out, especially in NYC. Their two biggest costs are rent and labor, so of course they try to minimize both of them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            You know what’s cheaper than hiring a cashier and teleconferencing them from the Philippines?

            The owner running the cash register. You know, like nearly every non-chain restaurant in the country.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        235 months ago

        I mean, yeah probably. That’s not the point. The point is that it’s a race to the bottom for people living in higher cost-of-living places.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        145 months ago

        I really don’t care how much buying power they have over there. A fair days work here in the US should be paid in turn.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            No, you can always advocate for someone to get paid more regardless of your knowledge of conversion rates.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          And flood the islands with US currency? Seems that would lead to massive inflation and hurt the people not working “in” the US.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            So what your saying is they should be paid less because their currency is trash? That’s a logical fallacy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        105 months ago

        Okay. Imagine the purchasing power of someone who made the NYC minimum wage of $16/hr.

        Maybe pay people for their time, not what the exchange rate “might” be.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          If I’m paying NYC minimum wages, I’m getting someone from NYC, in NYC.

          Sorry lady from the Phillipines. You’re out of a job because they put in this new “outsourcing must be at local wage rates” law.

          • sunzu
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Do you think anybody in NYC would cry over this?

            I am not sure why anyone in NYC would care about

            Sorry lady from the Phillipines. You’re out of a job because they put in this new “outsourcing must be at local wage rates” law.

            Lol what is your angle here

              • sunzu
                link
                fedilink
                5
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                NYC more deserving

                That ain’t how this works. If somebody is has some sort of special skill that is needed or there is a shortage, fine.

                But using foreign labor to lower wages locally, is just a bad policy for the state and for the workers, only people benefiting is the rent seeker.

                Why would anyone who works for money shill for the benefit of the rent seeker?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  24 months ago

                  Why would anyone who works for money shill for the benefit of the rent seeker?

                  Have you seen nearly Facebook America? They regularly vote against their own interests. Wouldn’t surprise me at all that the same people are the ones barely making ends meet, are advocating against unions, being pro corporate business, and laughing all the way to bankruptcy and homelessness day by day because it makes them feel superior to just one person.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  only people benefiting is the rent seeker.

                  I know this isn’t what you meant. But you know de-localizing jobs would probably have the effect of lowering rents.

                  only people benefiting is the rent seeker.

                  And the people who are now employed, and their local community that they spend that money in.

                  Again why is someone in NYC more deserving of it than someone else?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        Depends on the region, lowest is about 350 php or 6 usd per day. Most of the call centers are in the big cities however where wages are a bit higher and they well enough to be thought of as a decent job.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      104 months ago

      This practice is rampant across industries and only getting worse. We must demand an end to it through legislation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      We may not agree with it, but this is exactly the same thing as an overseas call center. They’re not physically located in the US and are not subject to any laws here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      654 months ago

      https://nypost.com/2024/04/09/us-news/nyc-restaurants-use-zoom-cashiers-from-philippines/

      adding that she splits tips with her manager and kitchen staff at the restaurant.

      They don’t even let her keep her entire tips. The whole situation is fucked. Somebody mentioned in the article also brought up a great point…

      “Today, this is a Filipino woman behind a screen, controlling a POS system — but it’s not crazy to believe that probably in the next six to twelve months, this could be an AI avatar doing all the same things,” he said.

      What a shitty future we have.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        194 months ago

        From the article, Sansan Chicken, Sansan Ramen, and Yaso Kitchen, all in NY. (Since nobody has said it yet)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        104 months ago

        Well yeah. When you eat at a restaurant, and tip, generally you’re not intending to tip the solely the cashier.

        Before chanting along with the hate chant just think for a second. When’s the last time you tipped a cashier, with the intention of the tip going to the cashier and none of the rest of the staff?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          Um…yes I do. If I enjoy the service of one particular waiter, I expect that the tip (at least the majority of it, let’s say around 75-90% if not 100% of it) goes to the waiter who served me. If I’m tipping a cashier, I just give him a few bucks and tell him to pocket it discreetly.

        • sunzu
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          That’s right folks, this is why you don’t tip cashiers or anyone else for that matter unless they get sub min wage rate.

    • fmstrat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      Was about to say the same. Up vote instead.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      975 months ago

      It’s not only legal it’s effectively encouraged. Capitalism is a race to the bottom, regardless of consequences.

      • @generichate1546
        link
        164 months ago

        When the supreme Court has their finger in the scale it makes everything feel fuckin hopeless

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          104 months ago

          They don’t help, sure, but this shit happens anyway in capitalism. It’s an inevitability.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            24 months ago

            Yeah it sucks how money flows to the people who can use it most under capitalism, without anyone having to force it to happen.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          They’re being paid minimum wage. It’s not a great job.

          Edit: And apparently they split their tips with the people working in the restaurant too, so I really feel like this is just exploitation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      84 months ago

      People should just not go there. But it’s america and they probably have 1dollar chicken nuggets or something.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        I would probably just turn around if I saw and understood what I was looking at. Definitely wouldn’t go back a second time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        265 months ago

        They are not physically in the US, and probably work listed as some sort of overseas contractor. Whatever wages they earn are from their employer who contracts for the restaurant.

        That’s probably how it works.

  • The Pantser
    link
    fedilink
    1095 months ago

    At that point why even have a cashier? Just put a POS and have people swype to enter like a subway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        105 months ago

        $3 is good pay over there, buys way more than our $3. Bet people are scrambling for those jobs. Good money when the daily min wage is $8-$10.

        For example, my wife’s ex took her family and friends to the fanciest restaurant they could find. $120 (including tip) for 16 people.

        Americans are the ones exploited here. McDonalds is pumping money out of the country and taking our jobs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Your take away here is that Americans are the real victims? If we are talking about countries, theres not many that have caused as much suffering and death as America. We just do it for money instead of religion.

          America exploits the rest of the world, full stop.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            America exploits the rest of the world, full stop.

            South America, west Africa, some of the Middle East, yea. Rest of the world, not that much. Out of any conquering army, the US installed regimes have been a bit above the Soviets. Japan and West Germany did great, SK had a tyrannical dictator, so was Chiang-Kai Shek- though the US nowhere near installed him. But neither the Kim’s nor Mao were much better. South Vietnam was propped up by the US but created because of the French. Ho Chi Minh may not have been that bad, and his replacements were ok. Pol Pot was very bad though. Lets not talk about the Soviet invasions of Poland, Budapest, and Prague. And even before that how they forced out previous democratic governments. Basically all the Soviet regimes in Europe sucked(Tito may have been ok, but wasn’t Soviet). Not to mention actions in Mongolia and Central Asia.

            If we were to mention British, French, and Spanish empires too. I’d say US world order is a bit above average compared to other world orders- especially in more recent years. Definitely not defending a lot of CIA actions abroad and FBI actions domestically.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              24 months ago

              Plus the addition of hindsight bias being applied to what used to be morally grey actions.

              I do wish we would just be more honest as a country.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      Sometimes it’s nice if someone gets a job, and sometimes people like to talk to a person while they’re paying.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        I would rather use a POS terminal than try to talk to someone over zoom with no headphones. If it’s not a human in person who can just say “hmmm the computer is broken here’s your sandwich” then it’s worse.

    • sunzu
      link
      fedilink
      19
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      immigrants are not stealing jobs.

      I know you are being cheeky… But you are using their lingo. It is strategic as it skips the the perp ie the rent seeker looking to underpay for labour.

      You know how fake teevee always got NYC migrant bussing story?

      But we never hear about migrants being bussed into the heartland to work in meat packing or some other hard work.

      Who is paying to bus them anyway?

      Asking for a friend

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    77
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This shit has got to be outlawed. Companies are doing this across the board. Literally skirting labor laws, outsourcing jobs that should be going to us citizens, all to just continue pouring more money into the tops pockets. When will we have all had enough?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s a simple enough solution in this case. They are performing the work of employees, so for all intents and purposes, they are employees. They are directly interacting with US customers at a physical location within the US. Their place of work is that physical location, even if they are not physically present. They need authorization to work in the US, and the minimum wage laws applicable to that location applies to these workers.

      All that is missing is the lawsuit under existing labor laws, which they will probably lose.

      • sunzu
        link
        fedilink
        114 months ago

        Good luck finding a judge taking such a position

        Judiciary is just a rubber stamp for the corporate needs. Last 40 years of court rulings speak for themselves.

        Courts ain’t saving slaves

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        Sounds like something the Department of Labour could legislate… Or could have.

        But the supreme court just ruled that this falls under the courts jurisdiction and there’s a snowflakes chance in hell that a case pushed high and far enough will result in those ghouls will rule in favour of labour interests.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          Yeah, I don’t think SCOTUS would side with an IRS or Labour Department rule requiring businesses pay minimum wage. But you’re forgetting the “racist” angle: the courts would love nothing more than to support a State Department determination that they are “immigrant workers” and require a work visa.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    705 months ago

    I would not shop here. If I saw this, I would turn around and walk out. Go somewhere that they value work.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    534 months ago

    Are there movements in the US or globally to force all business into worker coops? Unions are good but I think this is their ultimate limitation, that employers can just offshore their jobs

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Argentina has somewhat of a history of workers seizing their factories. I think it would be extremely hard in the U.S. due to the well-funded police. Generally, I guess the movement would be “anarcho-syndicalism.”

      Edit: misremembered worker factory takeovers in the past as occurring in Venezuela instead of Argentina.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        17
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        By that hyper-simplistic “logic” people shouldn’t be forced into prison if they murder someone.

        Clearly some kinds of forcing in some situations are “good”, and if some are good but other not, that means the real discussion is all about “when is forcing right and when is it not?” something that childlike “logic” of yours doesn’t even begin to address.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          Forcing to defend the lives of others, is very different from forcibly taking what belongs to others

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            94 months ago

            The meme is right, the claim of belonging is complete bullshit. Your toothbrush and your home belong to you, a business involving multiple people belongs to everyone involved. The idea that it doesn’t is narcissism and evil.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              Your toothbrush and your home belong to you, a business involving multiple people belongs to everyone involved.

              You’re free to believe what you want, I’m personally a Lockean property rights enjoyer.

          • J Lou
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            It rightfully belongs to the workers. The firm is basically a vehicle for appropriating the positive and negative product of production. The just basis of property is getting the positive and negative fruits of your labor (i.e. the labor theory of property). In a capitalist employer-employee relationship, the employer gets solely holds the whole product while workers are denied their claim to it despite it being a result of their labor.

            @aboringdystopia

      • @iknowitwheniseeit
        link
        134 months ago

        Forcing is absolutely good. We force companies to do all kinds of things, in terms of corporate governance (publicly traded companies must have their finances audited, for example), ownership (banks used to be prevented from buying stock so that they would not avoid calling in bad debt), and how they do business (collusion between big tech to keep salaries down for example).

      • sunzu
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah because private Enterprise will be guided by the invisible hand to do the right thing

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    504 months ago

    Having no actual person guarding your business is a recipe for theft. If this catches on it will be so much easier to steal from places. I’m ok with this

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      334 months ago

      You shouldnt ever try to protect the cash register at your place of work. They give 0 fucks about you and will have a job posting up before your body is cold.

      • sunzu
        link
        fedilink
        154 months ago

        Fact but it does not negate that physically present employees deters some crime.

        High traffic grocery stores who put in self check outs are staffing several guards now and put in some clown fences and gates…

        But hey guy who put in self check and guy fired cashiers both got bonus…

        Guy hiring security and putting fences also got bonus. These clowns will pay anyone any amount of money as long they don’t pay the worker for the actual job.

      • Random Dent
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 months ago

        I remember working in a store and a guy walked through the scanner at the door and it went off, the other employee looked at me and was like “that guy stole something, hey?” And I was just like “yep” and we went back to whatever we were doing lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        Can confirm, if they give any appearance of being human, even for years on end, it’s a lie, they are complete psychopaths and will throw you into the fire not even to save themselves, just to feel slightly less insecure.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        Retail jobs will tell you this too as they want as little liability as possible.

        Plus the registers only usually have a couple hundred bucks max at one time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      94 months ago

      The recommended course of action in a robbery is to follow instructions and hand over anything they ask for. If they grab product and walk out of the store, don’t try to stop them. This is actually less of an insurance liability than having an actual person there.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        54 months ago

        Yes but in general people are less likely to steal if there is a person standing in front of them watching. I’m not even talking about robbery just people stealing a candy bar or whatever. If it’s just sitting out with no one around people will take it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      84 months ago

      A 17 year old kid paid minimum wage who gives zero fucks about the company isn’t a huge deterrent either. As long as you don’t put them in risk steal from corpos all the time

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    455 months ago

    Japanese Fried Chicken? JFC

    Looks like this is “Japang”. Terrible reviews online and described as actually a “ghost kitchen”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      255 months ago

      Ghost kitchens for those who don’t know are basically “restaurants” for online takeout orders. They don’t do in person service.

      • NoIWontPickAName
        link
        fedilink
        155 months ago

        It’s more they use spray existing kitchens to do so.

        The Denny’s around here is a ghost for like 3 different places

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          Yes sorry you are correct, forgot that critical piece. They often service multiple “places”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    424 months ago

    Working as a graphic designer in the US since the early 2000’s, every employer I ever worked for eventually used Fiverr to pay someone overseas a fraction of what they paid me to do the same work. This doesn’t seem meaningfully different.

    Not saying this is okay, just that it’s not even remotely (no pun intended) a new problem.

    • sunzu
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This whole thing is a to send a message to begin with as with AI, actually more so.

      Most of the “AI job losses” are this sort of offshoring actually… Joke is on the wage slaves.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            There was an article that exposed Amazons cashier-less stores were just bunch of Indians overseas reviewing footage because their classification algorithms failed half the time

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    40
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Ah yes, it’s the minorities who are stealing jobs. Not the lack of regulations blocking corpos from outsourcing work.