I have no idea about William Hill. But the odds they describe sound about right to me, and the Nate Silver thing and the summary of Trump’s speech sound informative

inb4 BIDEN COPIUM HAHAHA etc and etc

    • mozzOP
      link
      fedilink
      101
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If only the well wasn’t poisoned with REPLACE BIDEN NOW OR WORLD WILL END ALSO KAMALA SUCKS bullshit, 5-10 times every hour, some of it coming yesterday still with fresh Cyrillic in its video description, we could have an adult conversation about what a good Democratic strategy would be, so that the end of the world doesn’t get elected

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      fedilink
      384 months ago

      Absolutely correct. But even if the choice is a shitty one it’s also a very easy one. If you want fascism, vote for Trump. If not, vote for Biden.

      • mozzOP
        link
        fedilink
        374 months ago

        Or whoever the Democratic nominee is

        There’s a perfectly reasonable conversation to be had about replacing Biden being a better strategy. 10 seconds of thinking will lead one to realize that figuring out the strategy, and then switching to it, is way better than dumping Biden and then figuring out the strategy afterwards. And, it’s notable that all the same outlets who are openly hostile to democracy in the United States were the ones that were pushing so hard on the backwards version of the strategy, until the more gullible parts of the Democratic Party apparatus eventually picked it up and started running with it.

        The forward strategy is still fine. The loud preemptive drumbeat of hard criticism of Kamala that is now emerging, though, should hopefully serve as a big loud blaring fucking wake up call to anyone who is sincerely interested in defeating Trump who is still echoing the backwards version.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I’ve said it before I’ll say it again. I’m voting for Kamala but it’s not clear she’s better than Biden as a strategy.

          But what is clear is that Kamala is better than nearly everyone else the Democrats can crown between today and the DNC. We only have a 4 months before the election and Kamala is the only one who was actually campaigning at all.

          So if we replace Biden, it’s almost purely to give Kamala a running mate. That’s about it, and these value in this.

          • mozzOP
            link
            fedilink
            74 months ago

            Yeah. To me the only options with any level of realistic viability are:

            1. Biden
            2. Harris
            3. Contested convention, someone with a baseball bat in hand talks firmly to the DNC about not fucking everything up with their foot on the scales like they did in 1968 and 2016, and see what shakes out of an actually fair process

            Anything else is nonsense. I have no real ironclad feelings about which of those options is best, although I lean towards 1 or 3, but the DUMP BIDEN RIGHT NOW, NOW NOW NOW, DON’T THINK ABOUT IT BOY DON’T ASK QUESTIONS JUST DO IT OR ELSE YOU DOOM AMERICA AND IT’LL ALL BE YOUR FAULT idea doesn’t appear in that list. To me.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Yeah. I’m not against removing Biden (even if I think keeping Biden is the best option). I’m just against a brainless, plan less removal of Biden.

              I’ve pointed out how Liberals rallied in 2011 for Occupy Wall Street only for Republicans to win in 2012, 2014 and 2016. People need to think about politics of they ever want to get ahead.

              It’s not sufficient to just get together in a large rally. We need actual votes.


              I feel like #2 and #3 will likely lead to Kamala. I’m up for an open and fair convention even if Kamala isn’t selected.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      354 months ago

      I’m not voting for either candidate, I am voting for the people around Biden and against people that support P2025. Pretty simple.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        As someone who didn’t think Biden was a good choice in 2020 I fully agree, his administration seems to actually make things better!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 months ago

      If a hypothetical person with all your favorite attributes got elected, after 2 years of propaganda you’d be complaining about how awful they are.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        134 months ago

        Biden was and will be another good president. Stop allowing perfection to be the enemy of good.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        84 months ago

        Honestly id take the Enclave from Fallout at this point. At least then we get eyebots, power armor, and vertibirds. Plus I want to release FEV Curling 13 into the water supply of Utah to see what happens.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            44 months ago

            More like Mormon Cadavers. The Enclave was gonna use FEV Curling 13 to commit omnicide against everyone not vaccinated against it, which happened to be a list consisting exclusively of the Enclave.

            • ArxCyberwolf
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              Right, I forgot the distinction. I’ve gotta play Tale of Two Wastelands again.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                If it makes it any better its better explained in Fallout 2 when you talk to president richardson. They barely explain it in Fallout 3.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Am Canadian. Does that mean we are winning? Cause it seems like we are losing, just more politely.

        Sorry to bring the mode down eh.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      384 months ago

      The answer is no one knows. If you care, vote and don’t be complacent. Even if the news decides they think they know, they still don’t know.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        In a race to the bottom I never bet against trump. Literally if Biden stops talking today I bet he’d have a better chance of winning by the end of it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      144 months ago

      The person losing more is the one that most recently opened their mouth and reminded voters who they are.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      124 months ago

      While it looks like half the country is split between this dipshits, in reality the majority of Americans agree on a shockingly high number of issues.

      One of those issues is that both options are fucking awful, so who’s “losing” harder is matter of witchcraft at the moment as things violently spiral into the ridiculous

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        in reality the majority of Americans agree on a shockingly high number of issues.

        And it’s exactly why I say this every single day in some comment or another: I FUCKING HATE PROPAGANDISTS!!!

        What you said is absolutely true and without the likes of Fucker Carlson, Sean Hamface, and Laura Inbread, we’d actually have some fucking semblance of unity and solidarity… But no, we get divide and conquer… Hate hate hate hate. Fox primetime is literally the “two minutes hate” from 1984 with an ever changing Goldstein.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 months ago

        Biden is not really that awful as an option, as far as it goes. If he is in decline, he steps down after the win. It’s not like Biden as a choice is comparable to donnie as a choice. They are night and day.

        Now, trying to sell Biden as a product to “independents” (aka, the low info) because we sell politicians like the way we sell consumer goods like fizzy sugar water - that’s not so great, since the bothsiderists keep acting like they are equally bad options.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      104 months ago

      Just vote, volunteer to help give rides to people that wouldn’t be able to vote without it. If everyone votes, there will be no chance for the racist rapist with 34 felonies that has said on record that he will be a dictator.

      • Twig
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        It really isn’t a waste of time

          • Twig
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            If you say so. There’s a reason these odds are monitored, to dismiss it entirely as a waste of time isn’t wise.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      44 months ago

      They’re lying cause Trumps winning to the point high level democratic members are openly admitting Bidens gonna lose. All this is pitiful window dressing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 months ago

        The polls are literally telling you that it’s neck and neck right now. If this isn’t clear to you, the problem isn’t the polls.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I don’t cast my vote based on polls polls and no one should. They’re full of shit. Everyone needs to vote like they don’t exist.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            64 months ago

            They’re full of shit.

            While I agree that people should vote like they don’t exist, the reality is that they do a good job of giving you an idea of where voters stand. They were historically accurate in 2022.

            If you think “they’re full of shit” it’s almost certainly a problem of understanding rather than with the polls themselves. Considering you haven’t really made an argument as to why, I can’t know for sure.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Losing implies that something happened. Like in a race a contestant is visibly ahead, or in gambling you have more chips than someone else or your money is all gone.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    374 months ago

    The people that vote for trump don’t care.

    Christ, they wear diapers and put fake ear bandages on. You think they give a damn about what’s actually right?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Sorry but “BIDEN COPIUM HAHAHA” is right.

    The William Hill odds of a Trump victory in November lengthened from 2/5 (71.4 percent) on Thursday before his convention address to 8/15 (65.2 percent) on Friday.

    Donald Trump remains the overwhelming favorite

    This same agency is saying Kamala Harris already has better odds of becoming President than Joe Biden does, even without a decision to resign from Biden.

    • mozzOP
      link
      fedilink
      26
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Paying out higher (better) odds means you think they’re less likely to win

      Edit: They were initially confused about how betting odds work, now they’re confused about how outcomes work.

      William Hill is saying that Trump has a 65% chance to win, and the Democrat has roughly a 35% chance to win, and that Democrat is much more likely to be Kamala than Biden. There is absolutely no conditional involved in this odds presentation that would imply who has a better chance of beating Trump, as separated from the question of how likely the Democrats are to replace Biden.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The article says P(Biden wins) < P(Harris wins). It isn’t saying anything directly about P(Biden nominated) or P(Biden wins | Biden nominated) but it does imply that P(Biden nominated) is low.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        I think the chances of Harris vs Biden winning are incorporated into this percentage. But it doesn’t separate out the factors such as likelihood of being the nominee vs likelihood of winning the GE. So we can’t say anything definitive about that without more information on how it’s being calculated.

        • mozzOP
          link
          fedilink
          64 months ago

          I added an edit which is critical of your new assertion

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    334 months ago

    Look what was the big things coming out of the RNC.

    1. A bulldog
    2. The troll that protects the water hazards on Trump’s courses (Kimberly Guilfoyle).
    3. The shocked remains of Florida pedo (Matt Gaetz).
    4. Racist, washed up, whats to fuck his daughter (Hogan).
    5. The UFC (Dana White).
    6. Shit kid rock song
    7. The most gay entrance you could do outside of Vegas or Broadway (Trump).

    No one cares except MAGA country. It is boring.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      224 months ago

      Expecting the Dems to do a 180 and actually not fuck up is a bold expectation. JFC we need more agile leadership…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      One of my favorite quotes about Democrats (other than that they form circular firing squads) is that “Democrats will never pass up the opportunity to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.”

      :(

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    204 months ago

    Newsweek seems to be the only publication making these claims. We’ve had some 2-3 weeks of Newsweek reportage of the Trump campaign floundering, its wheels falling off, and it circling the drain. Given Newsweek’s right-wing ownership and recently poor reputation for facts, it does feel like an op (perhaps to lull progressive campaigners into a false sense of security?)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    114 months ago

    So I think we are in a post 2016 news cycle so even though an assassination attempt is kind of historic, it’s not that big of a deal in 2024 when I’m sure next week we will get another huge earth shattering news. Maybe this time Putin finally croaks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m an insomniac and the news came through while most of my country would be asleep. There’s been news I’ve woken my sleeping partner up for, because it’s been historic or 'in the run '.

      Jan 6 was one of those days.

      This wasn’t. And yeah it had just happened and then the event was over so, nothing really ongoing. But I literally read what I needed to about it and moved on.

      On reflection, America has used up all my sense of surprise, and I’m ashamed to say, compassion for them.

      I watched Sandy Hook unfold and cried. I remember that day. But the many, many that came after? Just another headline.

      I’m not hyper focused on the news; there’s plenty going on in my country of interest or more relevance to me.

      But I think it’s odd that the attempted assassination of an American President in my lifetime… Just isn’t surprising or interesting to me. I just have a ‘well that tracks for that place’ attitude. Putin? Now that would be something.

      • mozzOP
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        But I think it’s odd that the attempted assassination of an American President in my lifetime… Just isn’t surprising or interesting to me.

        Not here either.

        I have heard one person who wasn’t some friend/family I was specifically talking to about it, even mention it. And she clearly didn’t give a shit. She referenced it for like 5 seconds talking about something else and then never returned to the topic.

        It’s fucking wild. I think everyone has just tuned out of the crazy shit politics news machine… which of course brings its own brand of danger. ☹️

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          Literally nobody, except some pundits, has mentioned it at all. Biden said “feels bad man” and tried to call the family of the guy who died. That’s it.

          I think this may be the better timeline because he gets like 1% of the sympathy of a normal president and all of the PTSD. If he died, he doesn’t get to lose the election.

          Fucking vote.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    104 months ago

    Well that’s a click bait title. It’s based on betting markets that the head line completely misinterprets. The article itself admits Trump is still the favorite by far.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    94 months ago

    Over the same period, Biden’s odds of securing reelection later this year deteriorated substantially to just 12/1 (7.7 percent) as the president faces pressure from within his own party to withdraw from the race.

    Donald Trump remains the overwhelming favorite, but his odds have lengthened a touch – now 8/15 to return to the White House.

    Yeah…