She’s already broken barriers, and now Kamala Harris could shatter several more after President Joe Biden abruptly ended his reelection bid and endorsed her.

Biden announced Sunday that he was stepping aside after a disastrous debate performance catalyzed fears that the 81-year-old was too frail for a second term.

Harris is the first woman, Black person or person of South Asian descent to serve as vice president. If she becomes the Democratic nominee and defeats Republican candidate Donald Trump in November, she would be the first woman to serve as president.

Biden said Sunday that choosing Harris as his running mate was “the best decision I’ve made” and endorsed her as his successor.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        Man now I want to vote Harris badly now! Obama wife would be a great VP really rub in watch Maga heads explode.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 months ago

          Michelle is a thoughtful and intelligent woman with some great experience, but I think she feels like she served her eight years, and has earned retirement (mostly) from politics. I tend to agree. That said, I’d be happy to vote for her in an election.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    802 months ago

    TBH statements like this are hurting her odds more than helping. Everybody on board already knows those things about her, nothing about her policies.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      252 months ago

      American people are notoriously uninterested in policy when it comes to presidents in the general election. they elected W (with a minority) because they felt they could have a beer with him. they elected Obama for change, him being smart, a good orator, relatively young and black was a huge contrast to everything W was. they elected TFG (with a minority) because they thought he was an outsider. they elected Biden because he wasn’t TFG.

      but yes they should promote Harris’ policies more because they aren’t bad.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        At least some of use do care. While I’m voting against Trump regardless, I’d rather vote for someone. If I do talk politics, I’d rather try to sell the benefits of a candidate, rather than what a disaster another candidate would be

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          I’ve always argued for that. like, usually if a party is running on being against someone or some group (this goes for parties demonizing gay people or immigrants or whatever minority as well) then i assume they’re not going to do anything for me, otherwise they’d be running on that.

          unfortunately in two party systems it becomes one party running against a minority and the other party running on not being as bad as the first party.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      192 months ago

      I think its less about changing the odds, and more about giving a needed morale boost to two minority groups long oppressed by politics in general.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        You should probably be worried about our odds at this point in the game. We can celebrate her traits when she’s in.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          62 months ago

          Oh I’ve stopped worrying about the odds, pretty sure we are permafucked. I’d like to be wrong and it’s not going to keep me me from voting blue down the panel.

          Just that I know from my own experience cultural racism and misogyny is still a ridiculously powerful force, even among progressives.

          And you are giving the public way too much credit. Almost no one really cares about accomplishments when it really boils down to it. It is all about how a person makes one feel, and that is largely informed by media that is notably NOT them enacting their policies.

          Yes she has a good list of positive accomplishments, and has demonstrated her skill at statesmanship consistently to those who follow such things, but that isn’t your average voter. Or even your average swing voter.

          There isn’t nearly as much cultural awareness of her as there is of a certain pants-shitting spraytanned twice impeached and 34 time felon, and people are gullible and easily swayed.

          I want to be wrong because I in at least two groups of the people that cheetolini’s camp squads want to come after first, but I’ve already been acting on plans to get my family out of the country for the last 8 hours and I don’t plan on being on my home soil longer than it takes to vote in November and get on a plane.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            62 months ago

            If you want to be wrong, shut up and help get literally anyone capable of the job into the oval office before Mr. Impeached for Insurrection gets another go at it

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            Nobody asked. Maybe go share your pathetic surrender in your own comment thread instead of attaching it as a reply to mine? Get some better feedback that way.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          In politics they certainly are, and even when they reach high position they face greater hurdles and prejudices than their male counterparts. You don’t need to be tiny in number to be marginalized inhumanely.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    412 months ago

    Honestly more amped up more than ever that there’s a nominee under 60. God bless Biden for everything. That old turd Trump should realize he’s too old and drop out too.

    • Pelicanen
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      She’ll be 60 by the time of the election though.

      edit: it’s not a bad thing, she’s still a lot younger than both Biden and Trump so it’s a huge step in the right direction, I’m just pointing out that she won’t be under specifically 60.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 months ago

    Let’s maybe not focus solely on this, instead maybe on policy? Real problems Americans are facing every day is going to win more votes. Making the entire campaign about gender issues isn’t alone going to win shit.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    222 months ago

    Does she support Netanyahu as unconditionally as Biden? I’ll vote for her anyway, but it would be nice if she actually took a stand against genocide. I’m probably asking too much, though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      182 months ago

      Why does Obama’s white mother determine how you refer to him instead of his black father, I wonder

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          Why doesn’t Obama’s blackness count? Does a little whiteness trump all his blackness for you?

          Do you see how fucking stupid this is yet? Everyone understands what you’re saying. It’s just dumb as fuck. Obama identifies as black. The country sees him as black. Many black folk identify him as black. You calling him white is a self-report by you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          So to be extra simple about it, she’d be the first yellow-brown, where as Obama was white-brown.

          In terms of american racism its just the brown part that matters, that makes them both “black” and there was even past comments about Harris not being “black enough” or something to that effect.

          It makes more sense to call her the first Asian America that might be president if you want a “first” to claim.

    • qprimed
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      if she gets to the white house, I think it will be proudly said many, many more times.

    • EleventhHour
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This what i heard on the BBC.

      edit: they said, “Indian-American”

        • EleventhHour
          link
          fedilink
          62 months ago

          to be fair, i’m in the US. i heard it on the BBC Global News Podcast ;)

          i like to hear global takes on our dumpster fire domestic events

            • EleventhHour
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              if i were to speculate, it’s because Biden heavily carried the black vote in 2020 and that has been majorly slipping this time around-- something the DNC is very much hoping to capture with a Harris nomination. Now, I’m no pollster, but it wouldn’t surprise me if that works.

              many voters don’t know that she’s of Indian heritage and just incorrectly assume she’s of African ancestry. Presumably, that’s why there hasn’t been much of a public effort to make a correction.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                She wasn’t carrying the black vote when she ran in the 2020 primary. Her record shows her to be staunchly pro establishment. She wasn’t progressive as a prosecutor or as Attorney General, she opposed and obstructed police reform in California when she was in the best position to get anything done. Maybe black voters will ultimately back her if she gets nominated but her support among black voters isn’t a good argument for nominating her because it isn’t strong.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And first Indian or non-white President as well. Don’t know why people have trouble saying that.

      If she was Indian she wouldn’t be eligible to be president; they did say “South Asian decent” though.

      And are you saying Obama was white? I must be missing something here.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          So some words we’re going to take strictly literally but some words were going to take with simple intention?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            Why would you think she’s literally from India? What tf are you even talking about.

            Did you also want to see Obamas Kenya birth certificate lol

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 months ago

              I was talking about the poster I was replying to expecting people to take “non-white” in a very literal way, meanwhile using “Indian” in a non-literal way.

              Like, who complains about a news outlet not referring to her as Indian when they did say “South Asian decent”?

              Anyway, they’re no longer the top comment and have been downvoted appropriately, so I’m not really worried about it any more.

              Sorry if I offended you, though. Wasn’t trying to be offensive.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 months ago

                Ah gotcha, I see what you mean now.
                Oh no worries my friend. Same here.
                I really have to stop going into political posts for a few months.

                Enjoy your evening

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          152 months ago

          Dude, it’s a matter of linguistics and ethnic identity. Everyone here knows Obama has a white mother. You’re just being intentionally combative and taking advantage of the fact that most people - including Obama himself - identify him as black.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              132 months ago

              Again, this is just linguistics games. Obama is the first non-white president if your definition of “non-white” is something like, “A person whose ethnicity/ethnic identity is something other than white.” Assuming she wins, Harris will be the first non-white president if your definition of “non-white” is something like, “A person whose ancestry does not include any Caucasians.”

              Or rather, she would be if her father didn’t have any Caucasian ancestry. But he does. You knew that, didn’t you? Didn’t you?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  102 months ago

                  Oh, for fuck’s sake… No, what I’m describing is a logical problem with your statements.

                  First, let’s get this out of the way: Race is a social construct. We differentiate between “black” and “white” in large part because of racism. Ta-Nehisi Coates has written a lot about how without racism, we wouldn’t perceive each other as different because of such a tiny variation as the color of our skin, and I tend to think he’s right. Concepts of race, as opposed to minor genetic variance, are predicated on racism.

                  With that said, when you call someone “non-white,” you can mean it in the technical sense of not having Caucasian ancestry, which applies to neither Obama nor Harris (which I’m positive you didn’t know until now, since you’ve been calling her “non-white” in this sense), or you can mean it in the sense of a social construct, which applies to both Obama and Harris.

                  There is no definition of “non-white” that applies to one, but not the other. Both have some Caucasian ancestry. Both are perceived socially as non-white because of how their bodies express certain alleles. Pick one definition and stick to it.

            • Ech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              132 months ago

              Figured this is what you meant. Imagine invoking the reverse One Drop Rule and thinking you have the superior position.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 months ago

      A lot of us feel really bad about how we treat non-white races…

      Granted, a lot of us feel really good about it too…

      Either way, it weighs on us.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          82 months ago

          That’s only been legally possible in the US in the last 60 years.

          The scars are still visible.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 months ago

              As individuals many of us do. We baked a lot of racism and bigotry into laws and government agencies, and it still has an effect, and has not been thoroughly scrubbed. This is what folks are talking about when they discuss systemic racism.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                There is systemic race issues but now it has flopped the other way. People that are white are being intentionally not hired due to their race. How is this any better?

                I would understand if you guys advocated for people being preferentially hired due to coming from a hard home, but now its just based on race or other factors that dont define how hard their life is.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  92 months ago

                  There is systemic race issues but now it has flopped the other way. People that are white are being intentionally not hired due to their race.

                  Oh this old chestnut. If you are either this uninformed or this disingenuous, it’s not going to be enjoyable for either of us to continue this discussion. Someone else can do that work with you.

        • Doubletwist
          link
          fedilink
          62 months ago

          Trying to, but every time we do the right loses their damned minds.

          I love how people like you take “It’s about damned time we have a woman (or black, circa 2008) president after centuries of not treating them equally” and somehow interpret that as “We’re trying to keep the white male down”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            The right is not losing their minds over Kamala, most of them probably hope she wins the primary because she is a weak candidate. You guys are creating this who race thing out of a couple random crazy people on the internet.

            • catsarebadpeople
              link
              fedilink
              62 months ago

              Here it is folks. The left is the only group that has an issue with treating everyone the same. That means that the right has no issues on that front according to this lemmy.ml user.

              I would suggest blocking them completely as I have done. Their misdirection was fairly well done until the comment above so it’s best not to let them trap you in the future.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                Then why have you not blocked me? If I said I was a black woman would it be racist and sexist to block me?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            The right is a big varying group and some are good and some are bad. I think their policy is to treat everyone the same, whereas the lefts policy is to pretend to treat minority groups better.

    • catsarebadpeople
      link
      fedilink
      152 months ago

      This guy is a Trump supporter very thinly veiled as a leftist. Just thought folks on here might want to know. Scroll down just a bit and you’ll see the comment where they think that only Democrats are racist and the right treats everyone the same.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Leftists are absolute losers, I am not a leftist, and I am not a trump supporter, but I would vote for him over Kamala. Try again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      Someone asked me what I thought about Biden dropping out. I said, it doesn’t matter. I am over policy, specifically NOT horrible policies like Project 2025.

      So… like… what policies do you support?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    92 months ago

    Why only black? She is half Indian. I don’t recall an Indian president?

    Oh right nobody cares about other minorities, only kicking out Mexicans and propping up African Americans. Everyone else be damned.

    Also why is the presidency limited to natural born citizens? Most of the world except the US, most of South America and a smattering of other countries require this. Shouldn’t everyone who has worked to gain citizenship be afforded the right to run for office? Doesn’t sound very free to me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      I would argue it’s a security issue. I think it would be quite feasible for some foreign power to scoop up some 20 year old with nothing to lose and put them to the task of infiltrating America. In fact, stuff like that has already happened: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegals_Program

      Nowadays it’s much easier to influence the public by just bombarding them with bs social media posts. Watch the documentary “The Great Hack”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          All I’m saying is that it’s feasible, and very much in the interest of foreign powers to attempt to install people in positions of power. I think that’s a very cold take.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 months ago

          These “non voters” are bunch of fickle assholes. “I won’t vote because Biden is old” “I won’t vote because Biden supports genocide”… Okay, how about a young candidate who doesn’t support genocide. “Oh…uh… hold on, I need to check the online troll posts to come up with a reason… oh, I won’t vote for Harris because (any reason they can find)”

          They aren’t going to vote at all, they just want attention. No one should court them or care about them. Their only impact is to help Trump win with their nay saying. I say fuck those pieces of shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      202 months ago

      You realize that people like you are just helping the Republicans win by pushing Democrats not to vote because “it’s a lost cause anyway”? Then again, it’s probably what you’re wishing for.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Then shut up about your opinion that everything is lost because that’s exactly what you’ll get if you don’t.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              42 months ago

              Oh I see why you don’t care if Trump wins, you’re a CIS man, probably white as well, nothing will change for you

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              The convention hasn’t happened yet, which alternative candidate(s) are you supporting for the dems? Why not just have that candidate be the VP pick?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  I share your concerns but shes too new a candidate to have polling numbers reliably showing what states she’d be weak in. Wish it hadn’t been such a late switchup, certainly not ideal to fall back to Bidens VP suddenly like this but perhaps it catches the Trump campaign flat footed. Perhaps Vance wouldn’t have been the GOP VP pick if Trump had known he was up against Harris, seems to be some indication their campaign is struggling to pivot with regards to the switch.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Nah, she’s never been a contender. Unless the DNC rallies behind her and the rest of us agree, she will be a small blip on the radar as she was before being put into the VP spot

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      Hopefully there is potency in someone who can speak full and coherant sentences! :-D You may be right but at the very least it’ll be nice to hear lucid speech again and we’ll soon see if it’s actually effective in the current climate! Wow the bar has been set low!?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        Well this is just a silly take. Have you not watched the state of the unions during bidens presidency? He was a decent politician. That includes speeches.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          Oh he definitly WAS. Still can be on occasion. But the debate, trailing of into incoherance. Recent major gafs mixing up Putin and Zelensky and mixing up Trump and Kamala Harris?! His interview after the debate was better but not great and the harsh fact is that he’s as good as he will ever be right now and only going to get worse with time. As for the other person I was really mostly referring to, Trump has been a babbling, gush of incoherrancy for years!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Her dad is Jamaican and her mom is Indian. Her dad might be half black, I’m not sure. I keep seeing republican memes saying she’s not black or 25% black. Just endless memes trying to attack her on anything they can. Like, that’s not even important, we have a real competent candidate and that’s more than I can say about Dump.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        It is weird to call her black, she’s as much Indian as she is African. It’s like the racist “1 drop” thing, where if you have any black ancestors you are defacto black, except in this case supposedly woke people are using it as a selling point

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    I fear a Harris win. Not because I don’t want her to win. But because if the likes of Trump was the conservative response to Obama… I can’t fathom the horrible person they will come up with in response to Kamala.

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 months ago

      Maybe if we hit their cult afraid button hard enough they’ll Jonestown themselves? Mix up ninety thousand tons of It Was Actually Flavor-Aid?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      Let’s shine a light on that. Force “moderate” conservatives to come out and admit that they’re just racists and nothing more. They’re cowards first and foremost.

      This is a tribal affiliation game, let’s put what their tribe really stands for on blast so they lose social status. Their only friends should be other Nazis. There’s a lot of people on the fence who just want to be popular.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42 months ago

    That is the real question, is US of A ready for a woman presidency.

    It is has been only 100 years women were given rights to vote. And couple of years more than 50 years to universal suffrage.

    That’s nothing compared to nearly 300 years of its existence.

    /s for those who couldn’t get it