Yup.
Very annoying that they had to take out any mention of the DoJ, but better than nothing. Maybe. We’ll see
I don’t think they’d gone ahead with the superseding indictment if they didn’t still think they had a case. These are smart people, and they’re federal prosecutors who generally hate trying anything they won’t likely win.
They are some of the best prosecutors on the planet. They know how to make a case stick… according to the law.
The problem is that we have a corrupt organization that is actively changing the law to protect trump. So… time will tell with whether this sticks or if we get another ruling that protects trump.
Political Calvinball.
Destruction of the rule of law, a.k.a. tyranny.
Absolutely, they’re facing a huge number of unknowns with a corrupt supreme court on Trump’s side.
He was SCOTUS-ly ruled to be able to use DOJ as an ‘official’ act bc he was President when that occurred.
I’m aware
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Jack Smith for AG.
Honestly, we could do worse (see: Garland)
I’d say that in retrospect we dodged a bullet by not having him on the Supreme Court… except even that corporate shitheel is miles better than fucking Gorsuch and that fucker is, himself, by far the least awful of Trump’s appointments.
The Garland nomination was classic Obama - it was a strategically perfect pick in that no Republican could find a good faith fault with him, and at the same time doomed to fail because it assumed any Republican would act in good faith.
If this is in DC, does that mean no more Aileen Cannon for this case?
Different case.
Cannon’s is the documents.
That’s been appealed (yesterday) to 11th circuit.
Ahh ok. Thanks!
And let’s hope it is a swift decision.
Ahhh yes, the other set of federal criminal charges our former president and current presidential candidate is facing, not to be confused with the felony charges for which he was already found guilty or other charges in another state entirely.
I get that it can be confusing though
Different case. Cannon is in charge/was in charge of the top secret document theft case. She dismissed it on justice Thomas extremely flimsy reasoning, so it’s up to the appeals court to reinstate it.
This case is about his part planning, executing and covering up the Jan 6th insurrection.
Removed by mod
Epstein’s log prove that’s happened many times.
ABC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for ABC News:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
