I had two Samsung flagship phones, one (S20FE) had an optical fingerprint reader and the other (S22) had an ultrasonic one. Both of them somewhat regularly failed to read my finger, were slower than a fingerprint reader on the power button and are more expensive/complex to build. They won’t work with cheap 3rd party screen replacements and some screen protectors as well.

Meanwhile my $90 Android phone has a fingerprint reader on the power button. It never fails and I never have to perfectly place my finger on the sensor area to get it to work. It just seems like the perfect place to put a fingerprint sensor, so why do phone manufacturers keep using in-display fingerprint readers over the cheaper alternative?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    94 hours ago

    Optimal fingerprint reader placement is on the back of the phone. You can just pick it up slide your finger on it and boom on to the home screen. Just want to see the time? Just press the power button and see the lockscreen.

    • thermal_shock
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 minutes ago

      I’m mixed on this. I have had the S9 for 6ish years, since launch. I love that it’s on the back. except having to pick it up to unlock it lol. so 80% of the time it’s amazing, which I guess is good enough.

      also, pro tip, add multiple finger prints, both thumbs, and index, etc. so you can unlock it in multiple grips and don’t need a single finger available to get in.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 hour ago

      My under the screen fingerprint sensor allows me to take out my phone from my pocket already unlocked. No button presses, no fiddling with finger placement on the back, it just works and is fastest.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 hours ago

      Agreed completely. I have an S23 rn, but my previous phone was a mid-tier android with a fingerprint reader on the back. My natural resting grip on my phone would just unlock the thing. It was amazing. My current phone is a clear upgrade in every way except the fingerprint reader. My new one has it in the screen and I fuckin hate it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    56 hours ago

    I don’t understand why “FaceID” isn’t more of a stardard on Android. I remember people online complaining when Apple got rid of TouchID on their phones, yet anyone who use FaceID quickly forget that fingerprint skanners are a thing. It works so fast and you don’t have to complain about where a sensor might be on a device, if you can see the screen the screen the device is unlocked.

    • xigoi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      The unlocking flow is slower. With the fingerprint scanner, I just put my finger on the screen and go. With face recognition, I have to turn on the screen, wait for it to pick me up, then swipe to unlock.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 hours ago

        That might be an android flow, not ios. On my iPhone I pick up th phone and it turns on screens by itself and unlock instantly

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 hours ago

      Large iPhone notches are kinda ugly compared to the simpler notches in most other Android phones. Also, maybe there’s tons of patents by Apple. Could be why I don’t think I’ve ever heard of an Android phone that does more than a simple 2D facial scan with the normal camera

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 hours ago

        My friend got an nudged android and it seems very bad implemented where it covers content in many apps and it had no functionality like it does on iPhone. On iPhone it’s part of the notification system showing you info from other apps, for an example the timer app shows the time while cooking in nudge while I am on lemmy. Yes on a side by side screenshot it seems alot worse than using my old Motorola next to my IPhone, the “dead pixel” nudge on Android seem to annoy people alot more

    • @billybong
      link
      45 hours ago

      Not quite, you have to have the camera angled at your face. If the phone is flat on your desk it won’t unlock unless you lean right over it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 hours ago

        I don’t usually use my phone while it’s flat on a table, but I can say FaceID does work at an angle, because I just tap the screen and it reads my face and shows me notifications (I don’t have always on turned on and have hidden notifikation content behind the login as well)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 hours ago

      It became a big thing on android just before covid happened. Unfortunately, masks completely confused it.

      I currently have both active on my phone, it’s about 50/50 which unlocks it first. I tend to unlock my phone as I bring it out of my pocket via fingerprint. If that fails, then face ID kicks in.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 hours ago

        Apple quickly implemented a Mask FaceID scan so you could unlock with mask, I used that or just swiped my watch for payments etc. I did see quite a few android friends go back to fingerprint I remember

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    239 hours ago

    I don’t know but I prefer fp sensors on the back of the phone because my fingerprint is also up there naturally.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      86 hours ago

      Yes! I’m so sad they’ve moved away from this. I could pull out my phone AND unlock it in the same grab.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      46 hours ago

      I can’t find a decent screen protector for my Galaxy S23, no matter how I try, and it’s all due to the damned in-display fingerprint reader. Any adhesive-style screen protector has an open area for the fingerprint reader, and it’s either a different material or a different thickness; they all look like shit. I’ve tried the screen protectors that use a UV-cured adhesive, and they’re messy, difficult to apply properly, and generally a pain in the ass.

      I’ve relegated myself to not using a screen protector at all, but considering my pocket lint scratches my screen, it sucks.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    910 hours ago

    The fingerprint sensor on the power button isn’t the main reason why I got my Fold 6 but it’s such a small thing that sweetens the deal a lot. I absolutely detest screen based fingerprint readers.

  • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver
    link
    fedilink
    37
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I think the answer might be ‘because of marketing’.

    For me, I dislike both the power button AND the screen fingerprint reader. The power button because I like to access my lockscreen and not to be catapulted in the last app I was using ; the screen reader because it’s messy and oftentimes doesn’t work correctly. My newborn has been able to unlock my phone, multiple times…

    What I really miss was the fingerprint reader on the back of the device. It was convenient, fast, precise and let me access the lock screen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 hours ago

      Why not just tap the screen of your phone to see just the lock screen? It’s especially convenient my phone is sitting on my desk, just double tap

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      17 hours ago

      For my part, I don’t have all of my fingers scanned into the reader (Which is on the power button), so it’s easy to just use a different finger in the event that I want to access my lock screen specifically.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Yep, the pixel 4a was my favorite phone in recent history, largely because of the rear mounted fingerprint sensor.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        612 hours ago

        I had a 3a and thought I loved the rear reader, but apparently I have my phone flat on a desk or in a stand often enough that I really do prefer the front reader

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 hours ago

          I can never get my 6 to read my print unless I hold it in my hand exactly right (and even then it’s hit or miss), so the stand or desk thing is irrelevant in my case.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 hours ago

            Although the pixels specifically seems to be exceptionally bad compared to others. I absolutely hate it on my pixel 7 but my mom’s nothing phone seems to be much better but still not as fast/reliable as the dedicated sensor on the back or side.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    7017 hours ago

    I miss when it was on the back, right around where you put your finger when you pick up the phone.

    The underscreen one is a major downgrade and I gotta fumble with it a few times to get it to work, usually.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      810 hours ago

      My underscreen one is excellent and works 99% of the time. That still leaves it significantly worse than rear fingerprint sensor. RIP the best unlock method.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Biggest thing I miss about the old Pixels was this because you could swipe it to pull the notifications bar down. It worked system wide so you could during a game or video just pop it down to check time or settings and just flick it away without moving your hand to the top of the phone.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1016 hours ago

      Yessss. I had a Nexus 6P and the back fingerprint reader was amazing. Still probably the best phone I’ve had.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      715 hours ago

      I have a Google Pixel 5 and it’s in a great location for me. It’s right where my thumb generally rests.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      617 hours ago

      This so much! And it’s eragonomic no matter which hand you use. My new phone has it on the power button and it’s just ok. I miss having a rear touch sensor.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I had a power button fingerprint reader in the past (Moto G7 Plus) and it wasn’t great as I’m left-handed. My thumb ends up on the opposite side of the screen, so I had to use my index which isn’t ideal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 hours ago

        Nexus 6P / 5X all the way to Pixel 5 had it.

        While I miss the rear scanner, I have had no issues with the under-display type in the 6/7/8. I see people online every time this topic comes up, screaming that it’s awful, but… cannot reproduce, ticket closed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3319 hours ago

    Power buttons are often covered by cases and, since they’re usually a weak spot for water proofing, it’s more effective to have a case that fully covers the button. In-screen readers (like what I have on my Samsung A71) tend to be good enough most of the time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      717 hours ago

      It really depends on the sensor tech. The fingerprint reader in my pixel 7 pro is absolute dogshit. I’ve heard the pixel 9 line improves things though.

      • lemmyng
        link
        fedilink
        English
        917 hours ago

        Pixel 8 user here - the in-display fingerprint reader is fine, as long as my finger isn’t super dry (which happens regularly). So I’m regularly licking my finger to unlock the device like some boomer that’s used to doing it from turning pages in a book.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        515 hours ago

        My Pixel 6 never could read my right thumb, maybe 2% of the time. You know, the one used 99% of the time by a right handed person.

        My Pixel 9 Pro Fold with the sensor in the power button has worked 99% of the time so far with all registered fingers in all manner of grips. Almost too good honestly, since it unlocks sometimes accidentally when picking it up.

        That said, the rear sensor was still the best placement.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        215 hours ago

        I have a Pixel 7 Pro and have never had an issue. I don’t have a screen protector on, if that makes a difference.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            313 hours ago

            When I got the phone I also got one of the glass screen protectors, which was advertised as being extra thin for good touch sensitivity.

            I shattered it trying to peel the plastic backing off, and never got around to getting a new one.

            That one you linked looks like it would suit someone like me a bit better.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2119 hours ago

    Not an expert but I’d suppose it’s nothing more than marketing getting in the way and insisting on an over engineered solution because it’s flashy

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    618 hours ago

    For a while, there was a patent on it, at least in he US. I remember having to root a Sony phone to enable the fingerprint reader on the power button about 10 years ago.

  • BCX
    link
    fedilink
    518 hours ago

    Motorola does it on the power button

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      218 hours ago

      I have a T-Mobile Revvel as a backup, it has it on the power button. Actually a decent freebe 5G phone, no complaints