All districts are now required to promote abstinence, exclude consent, and remove any pictures of reproductive organs.

The Florida Department of Education (FLDOE) has ordered local school districts to submit their sex education plans to the state for approval. The FLDOE has also said the classes must promote abstinence and cannot include discussion of contraception or pictures of reproductive health organs.

The sex-ed takeover removes local discretion when it comes to district sex education classes and materials.

  • Bone
    link
    fedilink
    1093 months ago

    Scared of the vagina. And women in general. Who are these weak men? They shouldn’t have power anywhere.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      353 months ago

      I’m not sure they’re scared, I think it’s more about control and to make sure kids don’t understand what’s happening to them if they’re subjected to abuse or when they reach puberty. It’s all about power and control over the body of other people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        183 months ago

        They are scared of losing power. Shitty rulers always are, because they know how bad they are, or at least they assume others would treat them just as badly if given the chance, which is almost synonymous.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        73 months ago

        And more teen pregnancies so there’s more right coloured children and more women staying out of school.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      463 months ago

      It isn’t. Florida needs pregnant teenagers who can’t get abortions so that they can use their children to sit on the coastline and pedal the land up out of the water. This is also where they will get their electricity. It also needs a constant supply of these children because they’ll have to replace them after every hurricane.

      Everything I just typed is probably more likely to work than abstinence based sex ed is to prevent pregnancy and is just as scientifically valid as a sex ed class with no sex and no ed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You talking about the Black Mirror episode?

          I watched it a decade ago or something (can’t remember it), need to see it again. It’s 15 million merits though.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              Oh I wouldn’t have even remembered anything about the title without googling what you said so you’re doing better than me. :p

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      My guess would be sone form of gender astrology: Men bigger, have more angry, women smaller, have more talk.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    523 months ago

    These words include abuse, consent, domestic violence, fluids, gender identity and LGBTQ information, she said.

    Bro what. Ok ok I understand, no matter how much I disagree with it, why they think pictures of stuff are icky but c’mon, people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      443 months ago

      It’s beyond apparent they want women locked into abusive marriages again. If they could get away with it they’d be rolling back their abilities to use banks, get a driver’s license, or even work without the consent of their husband.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      163 months ago

      I remember sex ed class having textbooks with drawings, not photographs. It wasn’t icky. The topic was awkward AF, of course… Well, I dunno what textbooks are like these days tho.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    49
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    these guys think about sex and children too much to not be pedophiles.

    and this is the number one legislation you’d want to pass if you wanted to make it easier to engage in pedophilia.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    433 months ago

    Ah yes, more “protecting the children”* to pander to an angry and stupid electorate.

    * “Protecting the children” is a phrase used here to mean, “ensuring the next generation of an angry and stupid electorate.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You joke, but it does feel as though dismantling public education is just a knock-on effect of all these gag orders.

      If you want your kids to get a serious sex-ed or biology background, you’re obligated to send them to private schools.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        193 months ago

        That’s their plan. Educated citizens vote less often for restrictive, backwards Republican culture warrior control freaks.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          93 months ago

          The plan is a Christian Caliphate. These people are terminally lazy, so it’s less work to be a radical sect than it is to learn how to build a bridge, or a healthy family.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Don’t necessarily need to go as far as full private education. Unitarian Universalists have put together workshops for sexual education.

        https://www.uua.org/re/owl

        I’m not a member of UU, but I have friends who are and the curriculum seems legit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          I was raised UU! It’s a great sex ed and relationship health program that addresses all aspects of relationships, sex-related or not. I highly recommend checking out your local Unitarian Universalist church/congregation if you have one nearby. They’re pretty cool folks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      83 months ago

      Ed won’t even know where to start with his wiener. You ever read that story about the lady who never got pregnant because her husband had been inserting himself into her urethra opening?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        No, and that sounds impossible. Like, I can’t imagine how that could happen even once. Do you have a source? I can’t find anything.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’ll dig for it. Might have been bullshit but I definitely read it.

          Who knows? Maybe I’ll end up being the face of bad women’s anatomy on Lemmy. :p

          I’ll find it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’ve read that story, too. Still might be bullshit, but who would tell false story about sex on the Internet?

            Edit: found it, or at least an example

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Thank you for your willingness to look into it and your potential acknowledgement that the story may have been bullshit. I appreciate that.

            I’m pretty sure this can’t have happened, because the urethra is quite narrow and the opening so small, it’s a massive issue to get used to catheters with a tiny diameter. From what I hear, it takes a lot of physical and mental fortitude to be able to insert a catheter into that hole, needing good aim and perseverance, and a lot of design goes into making the cath process less traumatic.

            Caths are quite small. Unless a dick was literally a millimetre in diameter, I can’t imagine how that could happen, especially since the vagina is right next to that opening. If you even tried, it would just slip a quarter of an inch towards the opening that would easily accommodate it. It just seems physically impossible.

            e: turns out this did happen, in a case where the woman’s hymen never broke (it had to be surgically opened), and the man was under-endowed. It was a rare and unusual combination of anatomy. I stand corrected and retract my previous edit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              43 months ago

              The female partner had cribriform hymen and dilated urethral orifice but did not report any problems except infertility and her genital anatomy was normal. The male partner reported concerns over his penile size but was otherwise healthy. After incision of hymen, they were able to have vaginal coitus and successfully conceived. While urethral coitus is rare, it should be suspected in women presenting with infertility and a dilated urethral orifice.

              Just a slightly abnormal physiology, which would be spotted and understood better with better anatomy education.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          Not going to link it, but in the video I saw, there were two distinct holes behind the hole he was using. So, either he was using a urethra, or she had a second vagina.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            I’d really love to see that video. I can’t find anything like that. I found one article claiming a couple was using the wrong hole, but it was the anus, not the urethra. There are two holes behind that, if you’re facing a certain way. The urethral opening is so tiny that ‘micropenis’ would have to be a vast overstatement.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    303 months ago

    Ok, the title comes from the linked article, but they aren’t banned from “mentioning anatomy”. They are banned from showing pictures of reproductive organs.

    I don’t know why some people seem compelled to take a story that’s plenty horrible as it stands and give it a deceptive headline… seems like I’m seeing more of that recently. Are we really in a post-truth era?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      153 months ago

      I’d guess it was an attempt to keep the title succinct, then not proofing it properly. In any case, always read the article before commenting as titles are frequently misleading (intentional or not).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 months ago

      It’s even more unnecessary because the content is already plenty concerning in my opinion. I don’t see a need to embellish.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        That’s a fine rationale for omissions but the headline is directly misstating the guidance on anatomy. It’s unnecessary for the article to call it out in the headline.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      Ok, the title comes from the linked article, but they aren’t banned from “mentioning anatomy”. They are banned from showing pictures of reproductive organs.

      How is that any better? Next your going to rationalize having no books in a literature class, showing no pictures of cells in a biology class, or having a trigonometry class without using the devil’s radians.

      I don’t know why some people seem compelled to ignore all context and rationalize state sponored religious persecution in the name of “protecting the children”. It’s not post-truth just because you’ve decided to willfully ignore all the context.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Exactly. Because it’s not any better (“plenty horrible as it stands” as I put it in my original comment), the deceptive headline is not only unnecessary, but also taints the entire story with falsehood when it should not be so degraded.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          Mentioning anatomy isn’t substantially different than photos of anatomy in a classroom setting unless you’re a troll looking for a knit to pick.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      We live in an age where people are obsessively needy about being outraged to the point where they need to make shit up topics one another off.

      Lemmy is probably the best example of this behavior.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    243 months ago

    So are they just going to pray in class now? Practice their purity vows? Maybe we can have the creepy dad wedding right there in school.

    States rights is just a cover for them, so fuck it let’s do some pre-empting from the federal level. Either that or use the Dept. of Education to put up billboards around Florida’s interstates. Give them Sex Ed one way or the other since they don’t want to have consent as a thing either.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Well lookie here. It’s Big-Government DeSantis creating the Junior Anti-Sex League.

    The Junior Anti-Sex League represents the Party’s efforts to control the most intimate aspects of individuals’ lives in “1984”.

    Unlike Winston, [Julia] had grasped the inner meaning of the Party’s sexual puritanism. It was not merely that the sex instinct created a world of its own which was outside the Party’s control and which therefore had to be destroyed if possible. What was more important was that sexual privation induced hysteria, which was desirable because it could be transformed into war-fever and leader-worship.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    143 months ago

    Won’t anybody think of the children!?

    The age old adage of the oppressor

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    143 months ago

    Many, many doctors and health professionals are saying Florida Gov. Ron Desantis has a truncated and bifurcated chungus, and this has led to his fear of high school anatomy class.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    93 months ago

    The secret noo noo goes into the other secret place and that is how you go to jail. End 2024 lesson.