• Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    65 hours ago

    The more money I get, the more I want to give it away, so I’m going to guess the latter.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    56 hours ago

    A consequence free environment (boatloads of money) simply let’s people be who they are. Unfortunately bad people come into money more often.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    Español
    4
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I believe people are just what they are but when they get a certain amount of money it’s easier for people to show their true being.

    • Tedesche
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 hours ago

      I think this is it, actually. Having a lot of money can lead to spending it on frivolous things, but I don’t think that’s what we mean by corruption. It’s when you have so much money that you can use that money to influence people in power that it gets bad. Suddenly, when getting your way is merely a question of bribery and you have plenty of means to do it, people start thinking they have a right to pull the strings in the way they see fit.

  • xep
    link
    fedilink
    99 hours ago

    Often socio-economic structures also incentivize different behaviour for different amounts of wealth, so very often it’s not just money and the person but all of society as well.

    • toiletobserver
      link
      fedilink
      17 hours ago

      It’s those damn poors fault for making the billionaires be money hoarding assholes?

  • @21Cabbage
    link
    English
    16 hours ago

    I think it’s enough of a mix of both to where it doesn’t really matter at the end which was the cause and which was the effect. I feel similarly about the vague concept of power, to which money is a manifestation of.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    510 hours ago

    Both, I’d say.

    Money doesn’t create corruption out of thin air - anyone who’s corrupted by it already had to have the potential. But money does undoubtedly lead people who otherwise would have resisted their baser nature to indulge it instead.

    And it very definitely provides the means for people who are already psychologically and/or morally inclined to corruption, and so is very attractive to them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 hours ago

      I’d agree with that. If you use you’re vast wealth to do awful things then you’re an awful person. But I’ve defintely had moments when a moment of rage or lust or other bad intention has bubbled up inside, and I’ve wanted to buy a business just to fire the rude person I’ve argued with, or hire a team of sex workers just to fulfill some weird fantasy. But as a poor normal person those thoughts appear and pass because i can’t do anything about them. I’d hope that if I was a billionaire, I’d still take a moment and realise the gap between id urge and superego approved action, but who knows?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    410 hours ago

    That’s kind of like, “What came first, the chicken or the egg?” It seems to me that when you give a regular person a bunch of money, like winning the lottery, they tend to go kind of nuts with it. So in that way, it seems that money is corrupting them. If you have some kind of ultra-rich person who loves money and power, then they’re already corrupt because of power and money.