The Green Party leader has hired a GOP consulting firm and worked with Trump-affiliated lawyers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1613 months ago

    I’m sure the usual suspects will be along shortly to explain how this isn’t what it absolutely, positively is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      573 months ago

      Our biggest offender would, but they’re currently serving a 3-day ban for Sealioning (public mod logs are awesome).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      523 months ago

      “Anything to beat the ‘duopoly’ of political parties, even if the party is tainted by neo-fascist dark money!”

      Absolutely wild mental gymnastics lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 months ago

          You can spare Lemmy the whataboutisms with this one. Everyone is taking a little money from everyone else, but:

          Neo-fascists absolutely prefer giving to the Republican Party above all other major parties and vice versa. It’s an open-and-shut case. Hardliners in the party routinely echo anything and everything that gets them brownie points from dictators and the country’s most degenerate billionaires.

          The Democratic Party is not perfect (Israel being the elephant in the room, but make no mistake, Bibi 100% wants Trump back in office). But if anyone is pushing back against the return of fascism the most it’s the Dems. And you can see that in hostilities from Republicans and authoritarian governments alike.

          The Green Party’s main candidate accepted gifts from the Russian Federation through their news network RT, which is basically a propaganda machine for the government which owns them. Stein’s ads openly said in 2016 that the Greens wanted Hillary to lose, fearmongering nuclear war with Russia. And this year it’s the same old shit with her: just make the Dems lose.

          (Side note, Sputnik hired PSL’s Eugene Puryear as a long-time host. Also, PSL also has absolutely insane foreign positions. Like I’ll be the first to say the West is absolutely an imperfect cultural entity, but you don’t gotta just hand it to Putin or Kim Jong Un because they also have a problem with the hegemony.)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            You should maybe learn a bit more about “whataboutism” because you seem to not be aware of when to apply it.

            What I am saying is, if you dislike the green party because Russian money has made it into their coffers, but you won’t apply the same standard to democrats, then you are a hypocritical, and your message fails in my opinion.

            If you think the democrats have the strongest stance against facism, you don’t understand the meaning of the word facism.

            The democrats haven’t moved this country away from facism meaningfully in any way. They move the country towards profit, thats it. The republicans and democrats disagree on how to profit off the worlds misery and to what extent, but both are fascists.

            The irony that americans can’t see how close republicans and democrats are in their intolerance and abuse of others.

            Democrats: “We want to abuse non-white folk in other countries for profit!”

            Republicans: “we want to abuse our own people to make profit!”

            If you really think anyone who’s critical of the democrats is a shill or some other bullshit, then I wish you the best but thats a childish perspective.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      403 months ago

      Probably at the stage where it turns into ‘it doesn’t matter since she won’t win anyway, this is just a protest vote to show support for third party.’

        • John Richard
          link
          fedilink
          193 months ago

          Democrats: “If you don’t vote for Kamala you’re a Russian.”

          • TheTechnician27
            link
            fedilink
            English
            653 months ago

            If you actively go to the polls and while you’re there – instead of voting for Kamala Harris, the only viable candidate against Trump’s pro-Russia fascism – you choose to vote for a Russia-planted spoiler candidate and you live in a state that’s not safe red or safe blue, then yes, you are pro-Putin’s regime, and you unequivocally suck ass as a person.

            • John Richard
              link
              fedilink
              113 months ago

              If you go cast your vote at the polls and you’re so braindead that you can’t fathom another third-party candidate is running without being a Russian agent in disguise, and you’re so scared that your candidate that you’ve convinced yourself is a perfect deity still might lose to a lunatic, then maybe you should re-evaluate why it is that people no longer trust Democrats blindly like you think they should.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  23 months ago

                  And what about the huge group of people who care more about morals than money? Just fuck them? Oh no, I forgot, they are Russians right?

                  Do you really not see how your intolerance is exactly the same as republicans? You know you can vote democrat and still criticize them too right?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            343 months ago

            Let he who hasn’t dined at the same table as Putin cast the first stone.

            What do you mean that’s everyone but Jill?

              • TheTechnician27
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Quoting verbatim from a previous comment of mine because it’s literally not worth my time to come up with something original to the same exact stupid, worthless argument:

                Third-party fringe candidate who gets less than 1% of the vote having dinner with Putin, Trump’s national security advisor who was later arrested for lying to the FBI about his ties to Russia, and several major Russian political figures before an election in which Russian interference provably helped Trump win.

                The US president acting in an official capacity and meeting with the leader of a major world power.

                “They’re the same picture.”

                Boy, Russian bots Jill Stein stans are really tripping over each other to see who’s the biggest, dumbest idiot, aren’t they?

                • John Richard
                  link
                  fedilink
                  63 months ago

                  You mean the same investigation that found no evidence that Jill Stein was working with Russia? Let me guess, in your mind she’s so deep and undercover that it is more about a feeling than needing any evidence at all.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 months ago

                  Democrat Stans really are tripping all over each other to see who’s the biggest, most intolerant facist, aren’t they?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            193 months ago

            Leftists: The Green Parry isn’t a throwaway vote at all! Here’s my 40 paragraph manifesto that explains it all with YouTube links and op-ed opinion pieces to validate the proof!

                • John Richard
                  link
                  fedilink
                  4
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Almost as convincing as you calling a US citizen in Washington state a Chinese Government agent. Maybe if you want to be taken seriously in the future, actually provide some facts or say something productive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      183 months ago

      The same ones that jillsplain to everyone how her sitting there with Putin is no big deal.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    873 months ago

    With all this stuff about Jill coming out, it’s no wonder all the Lemmy.ml and Hexbears are so supportive of her. She’s a Russian asset!

    What is the Russian word for Wumao?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      213 months ago

      It could just be she made a career out of unsucessfully running for president and doesn’t care where the money came from.

      That’s supposedly how the whole Trump mess started.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        173 months ago

        You mean him just wanting to make money by running for president never actually expecting to run and regretting every minute of it while trying to be so vile he could never get elected again only to realize that’s what his base wants?

    • John Richard
      link
      fedilink
      163 months ago

      I’m not saying she’s not a Russian asset, anyone could be including the people spreading this rumor with no supporting evidence. It’s become a joke online that Democrats will now call anyone they disagree with a Russian asset.

      For some reason, on one hand Democrats will claim that peace negotiations between Israel & Palestine are a good thing, but how dare she say that peace negotiations between Ukraine & Russia are important too.

      Jill Stein has called Putin a war criminal while Kamala campaigns with a war criminal (Dick Cheney).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        463 months ago

        When did “Dick” Cheney campaign for Harris? He said he was voting for her rather than the felon. That’s it. Liz Cheney is the one who spoke at a Harris campaign, not her father.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          He didn’t. And Stein refused to say Putin is a war criminal. John Richard is in here lying through his teeth.

          • John Richard
            link
            fedilink
            113 months ago

            Yeah, you’re wrong and spreading misinformation like the average cultist.

            https://www.instagram.com/drjillstein/p/DAHhwbTSG2p/

            There are multiple articles showcasing where she has, but what you won’t find is a single article of Genocide Joe or Kamala calling Netanyahu a war criminal. They’re saying… You did such a good job killing all those women and children Netanyahu, here is a $8.7 billion dollar thank you check.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              283 months ago

              Genocide Joe

              Where have I seen this playground terminology before? Not that I want to support Biden’s policy on Israel in any way, it’s despicable, but a Stein apologist using Trump’s own puerile rhetoric raises an eyebrow.

              • John Richard
                link
                fedilink
                93 months ago

                Not that I want to support Biden’s policy on Israel in any way, it’s despicable

                So then don’t do it. Don’t lie for Joe & Kamala by attacking anyone who says something negative, even when true.

                Kamala has some good qualities in addition to her bad statements on the Palestine & the Middle East situation. The only way Democrats will change their bad qualities is if people stop sugarcoating the truth for them.

                Calling people Russian agents that call out the cultist & attack dogs for Democrats does nothing to help them or the party. It only makes you and them seem as fanatical & unhinged as Republicans calling every Democrat a commie.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                73 months ago

                Are you suggesting Trump would ever attack Biden for facilitating a genocide in Gaza? They agree on that policy!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        373 months ago

        Lol your defense of her is “anyone could be a Russian asset!” is like a textbook denial list. What’s the next stage?

        • John Richard
          link
          fedilink
          73 months ago

          The next stage is for you to call me a Russian agent for saying something you don’t like. Textbook denialism would be you presenting facts showing she is loyal to Russia, or working intentionally on their behalf, and then me denying it. Thus far your “evidence” is a Salon article with a headline that doesn’t even represent the story and makes baseless accusations.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            313 months ago

            Nah you’re just a lier, that’s all.
            I didn’t realize I presented evidence of anything, but ok.

            • John Richard
              link
              fedilink
              73 months ago

              You haven’t. That’s my point is that the blue MAGA cultists here are claiming Jill Stein works for Russia but they don’t have any facts to support it. They’re mad that facts don’t support their feelings.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                claiming Jill Stein works for Russia but they don’t have any facts to support it.

                Everyone in this photo works for Putin and were there at the behest of Putin. Two Americans are in this photo. One was put in jail for a while because they lied about working for foreign actors, least of which is Russia. I’ll leave it to you to see who the other one is.

                All this evidence of Stein actively using GOP (and thus Russia) aligned assets/money and refusing to denounce Russia in any capacity until forced, only further drives nails in the coffin.

                Take a hike.

                • John Richard
                  link
                  fedilink
                  63 months ago

                  LOL… you got your 4chan QANON proof right there. A photo with little arrows without any facts or evidence that Jill Stein works for Putin. Jill Stein called Putin a war criminal. It’s really rich that you demand politicians call out war criminals, but you’re not demanding that Biden or Harris call Netanyahu a war criminal. You know who else Russia helped? Bernie Sanders. According to your logic, if Russia helped Bernie Sander’s campaign then he must be a Russian agent.

                  You know there is this thing called talks with world leaders on a global stage as a politician, and this picture is nothing more than you desperately trying to paint a narrative without any supporting facts. You don’t even attempt to provide facts, but instead hope that most users will be a desperate as you are to ignore them thinking it will somehow make Trump lose.

                  Just like the lap dogs that were here after the debate between Biden & Trump saying Biden did amazing and sounded sharp as a tack. Need I remind you, Biden was losing to Trump at that time in the polls by over 4 points and was on pace to cause Democrats to lose the House & Senate. Your way of helping almost cost Democrats chances of winning in 2024.

                  Oh, here’s a picture for you BTW that using your logic shows that Biden works for Putin.

                  https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/Putin_in_Switzerland_2021_10.jpg/1280px-Putin_in_Switzerland_2021_10.jpg

        • John Richard
          link
          fedilink
          73 months ago

          I don’t really know how to respond to that since you put “dick” in lowercase. If you want to conflate campaign with, with tour with, then by all means go read a dictionary. But if you want to see videos of Harris praising Dick Cheney, thanking him for his support & his service to this country, claiming, that he represents a “healthy” two-party system, then I can send you videos of the campaign events where she’s touring around with his daughter while she makes those statements.

            • John Richard
              link
              fedilink
              63 months ago

              Cheney endorses Kamala… starts speaking out against Trump, and Kamala starts praising Dick Cheney saying he’s one of the good ones and then goes on tour with Liz Cheney his daughter who has never renounced her father’s war crimes. Yeah, okay… totally, that is normal to have a war criminal endorse you and then boast about it and praise them afterwards.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                103 months ago

                Uh huh, anyways. Let’s see those campaign photos or videos of Dick Chaney with Harris.
                We’ll wait.

                • John Richard
                  link
                  fedilink
                  6
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Again, pick up a dictionary. Campaigning together doesn’t mean that they have to be seen together. It can be Dick Cheney doing public interviews saying how he’s voting for Harris, while Harris is praising him saying:

                  https://www.youtube.com/shorts/7S-Sk2TbdjE

                  And that she’s honored to have their endorsement:

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNVoSdUHw5I

                  My favorite is the lady standing behind her while she calls Dick Cheney a leader who is well respected with wide eyes like “Kamala, why are you so stupid to say that and do it in front of me?!?”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I don’t. But you sure do lol.

                Kamala campaigns with a war criminal (Dick Cheney).

                When pressed you people turn Dick into his daughter. It’s pretty entertaining watching you flail around so much. Please , go on.
                🍿

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  53 months ago

                  So you never actually read any responses and just went with whatever narrative fit your world view? Seems sad. Anyway Google Harris dick Cheney and pick your favorite propaganda outlet, even Fox says it’s real and a step towards biaprtisanship that hurts trump somehow

            • John Richard
              link
              fedilink
              53 months ago

              No, if you can’t read a dictionary there is nothing I can say to convince you that water is wet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        103 months ago

        Is it any different than a socialist that accuses anyone that disagrees with them of being a genocide supporter?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          I mean if you keep funding genocide to the tune of billions when kids can’t eat at school and veterans are homeless, it’s not not supporting genocide.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Tell us you have no idea how any of this works after it’s been already been explained to you a thousand times without telling us you have no idea how any of this works after it’s been already been explained to you a thousand times.

            The “funding of genocide” as you call it is actually an agreement that the US has had with Israel for decades. And unless you know exactly what that agreement details, and have a firm understanding of how nuanced diplomacy works outside of video games, I’d suggest that instead of being a smart-ass on the internet about things you don’t understand- you read up on how it all works.

            Because it Is in NO WAY supporting genocide to continue a pact agreed upon. And if you think the US can just cancel that- you REALLY need to brush up on how this shit actually works in the real world.

            It’s VERY complicated.

            NPR had leading experts on this exact thing a few mornings ago. Even they said when asked why the US continues to uphold this agreement- that it isn’t easy to get out of these things without escalating the situation.

            So unless you know more about this than they do- maybe stop arguing with everyone when they tell you you’re wrong.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      123 months ago

      Are you confusing the Green candidate, Jill Stein with Claudia De la Cruz, the PSL candidate?

      She does deserve praise for taking the correct stance regarding Gaza, but the general consensus of the Greens as a whole is that they’re useless because unlike PSL, they don’t organize between elections.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Of course they organize between elections. Just because the news doesn’t cover it doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. They have parties in local office doing work year round

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      263 months ago

      …I would argue that even insurrectionist is being far, far too lenient. They should be called terrorists. But, yeah, calling them “rioters”…barf.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        They should be called terrorists.

        Stein’s campaign also paid $100,000 to a consulting firm, Accelevate, that has worked with Republican campaigns for signature-gathering services.

        This is now the bar for “terrorism”?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          173 months ago

          Um, what? I’m commenting on the corporate media’s insistence on calling the insurrectionists “rioters”. I think even the term insurrectionist is a bit of a euphemism.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’m commenting on the corporate media’s insistence on calling the insurrectionists “rioters”.

            Oh, that. I mean, that was a riot in a very classic sense. To call it an insurrection feels romantic, relative to what amounted to a massive adult baby temper tantrum that left a handful of people dead. Insurrections tend to have stronger leadership and more strategy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              That is a shockingly harsh sick burn. Holy shit.

              Edit: still love it. Can’t stop thinking about how well this casually and truthfully states it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        you: le government is bad, crooked and corrupt. We must seize the means of production!

        also you: omg, those inshurexionists… they made the government poopy their pants and punched some cops (we love cops now) TERRORISTS!

        Is this even real?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          20
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Ahh yes, seizing the means of production by nullifying a democratic election. Look at what the longshoremen are doing on the East Coast, that is seizing the means comrade.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          193 months ago

          Nuance would be your friend, if you understood it. There’s a difference between a fascist uprising, a populist uprising, and a revolution. At this point the leftists understand that one can be far more effective online than in person, and they are killing you into a false sense of security. Marx is your friend, especially Groucho and Karl. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, and Adolf Eichmann are not.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            43 months ago

            Looking realistically at the situation, it was an ineffective riot by some clods. Knowing that and watching the politicos cower for once should bring joy to the heart of anyone who has had to deal with the system. I mean… unless you actually are a statist at heart. Then it was a great insult to the power structure.

            Whoever swallows the rrats and takes great offense literally outs themselves. I’m sure they’ll downvote away but fake internet points don’t take away the stench of being a phony.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              20
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Ahh, thanks for clearly stating where you align. I’m no statist, but just from your description, you’re clearly a statist apologist.

              Disregarding the fact that that particular insurrection was incited by a sitting president, those insurrectionists were and are unrepentant bigots that chose violence over the social contract. That you defend them in any aspect merely shows your own reliance on the status quo.

              Come back to me when you are actually willing to throw your own comfort aside, when the cops are around. I do so every single time I see a fucking pig.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                53 months ago

                Come back to me when you are actually willing to throw your own comfort aside, when the cops are around. I do so every single time I see a fucking pig.

                Based

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I mean if you believe in democratic ownership of the economy then trying to undermine the democracy is basically treason.

          Reality though is we’re voting for one faction of elites and another, less competent but more brutal set of elites via an election that has the trappings of democracy. Stealing that is depriving the public of the tiny crumb of choice we have, which honestly should bring out the bloodlust against the Jan 6th people. Why take away our final bit of control?

          You’re basically making the argument “Its just a crumb of democracy, why bother?” but for most people in the US it is the last remaining crumb of control over our government and expecting people to surrender it entirely to elites is some insane shit.

          Elites here are generally the economic elites: Musk, Gates, Bezos, other corporate CEOs who would love nothing more than to take away the public’s final bit of influence over government.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          they made the government poopy their pants

          If this had been a private property owned by one of your favorite mega-corps rather than the legislature’s main office, I suspect you libertarians would be singing a different tune.

          What is it about the Non-Aggression Principle that just melts away for the Reich-Wing Party when its a mob of anti-immigrant psychos busting a cop’s head open with a flag pole?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    36
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Nothing about this story or Jill is important except for one thing. She is aligned with Putin in denying Ukraine weapons to defend itself. She may not be purposefully supporting Putin but she is supporting his position and making his position stronger ignoring Putin’s past patterns of behavior.

    • John Richard
      link
      fedilink
      83 months ago

      Dick Cheney? Oh wait, that is the war criminal an actual Presidential candidate is campaigning with.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      Her trust fund. (And other rich idiots who think giving her money cleans them of sins of capitalism)

      She’s just a rich bored kid who wants the attention like pretty much all politicians these days other than the prostitutes the Republicans bring in to slow proceedings in a way they expect to be able to control by being the source of their money.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    293 months ago

    In Nevada, the Democratic Party initiated a lawsuit to exclude the Green Party from the ballot, claiming the party used the wrong form to collect signatures from voters. The Green Party appealed the case and was represented by Jay Sekulow, an attorney who defended Trump throughout his impeachment trials (last week, the Nevada Supreme Court rejected Stein’s bid to be put back on the ballot).

    In Wisconsin, Democratic National Committee employee David Strange sought to remove Stein from the ballot by arguing the Green Party can’t nominate presidential electors without legislative candidates eligible to do so. The Wisconsin Supreme Court declined to hear the case. Stein was again legally represented by a Trump-affiliated lawyer, Michael D. Dean, who was involved in lawsuits that attempted to overturn the results of the 2020 election, the Journal reported.

    From another article:

    The affidavit originally submitted with the Green Party’s petition in July 2023 was the correct one. However, because the petition that the Green Party submitted contained a separate mistake, an employee in the secretary of state’s office sent the party a sample petition that included the wrong affidavit – for use with petitions to put initiatives and referenda on the ballot. As a result, the affidavits that the Green Party later submitted with its petitions did not contain the attestation required for access to the ballot.

    The secretary of state eventually announced that the Green Party had submitted enough signatures to qualify for the 2024 general election ballot.

    The Nevada Democratic Party went to state court in June of this year, arguing that the signatures were invalid because the Green Party had used the wrong affidavit.

    On Aug. 12, the state trial court ruled in favor of the Green Party, but on Sept. 6 a divided Nevada Supreme Court reversed. It concluded that the attestation that the Green Party had failed to include “serves an essential purpose.” Therefore, the majority reasoned, allowing the Green Party to have its candidates on the ballot when it had not fulfilled all of the prerequisites to do so would nullify “the requirements that were put in place for the public’s benefit.”

    SCOTUS ruled with the Nevada Supreme Court and chose to keep the Green Party off the ballot. Their only real mistake here was really just some legal red tape filled out incorrectly. It doesn’t really matter if Jill Stein is a terrible candidate or not, the two party system will clearly go to the ends of the earth to kill 3rd parties from every becoming a thing lol. I guess it matters more for democrats since green party would be taking out more of their votes than republicans.

    • Cowbee [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      193 months ago

      See also: the Dems suing to kick Claudia De La Crúz off the ballot in Georgia and PA. “Democrats” in name-only.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      133 months ago

      The affidavit originally submitted with the Green Party’s petition in July 2023 was the correct one. However, because the petition that the Green Party submitted contained a separate mistake, an employee in the secretary of state’s office sent the party a sample petition that included the wrong affidavit – for use with petitions to put initiatives and referenda on the ballot. As a result, the affidavits that the Green Party later submitted with its petitions did not contain the attestation required for access to the ballot.

      Wow.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      123 months ago

      The DNC seems overly happy to use bureaucracy as a cludgel to reduce options “legally” to themselves.

      While I get the fear beating down your competition in an underhanded manner doesn’t inspire a whole lot of good will and also seems extremely unlikely to get the people you have just disenfranchised to vote on your side.

      They resist any movement or adoption of new policy in favor of it staying as stagnant as possible. It’s a deeply confusing and long term failing idea. Just look at how Kamala is now polling worse with each passing week. She felt like change and initial momentum of “joy” was able to carry her a little but it’s not a permanent state and the initial dopamine is running out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        I honestly feel it. They took the high road for like a month. Back to slinging shit though they go. What a joke. How is anyone supposed to trust them?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          33 months ago

          They had the momentum of a new candidate and it was full of excitement for new policy then she was seemingly told to not change things still.

          I mean literally pro gun and loose company first economic policies are early 2000 Republican policy. So now it’s instead just focus on how shitty the orange bastard is, which is a low bar to easily walk over.

          It really does feel disingenuous to blame people uninspired by that and to claim it’s a fixing party. I get the other option but people need to not act like angels when stagnant bullies that refuse to budge or listen anymore.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Wow, Dems actually exercised power in a legal manner to improve their chances. That is wild. Hope they don’t break their backs slapping themselves.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        73 months ago

        They will always do it so long as it weakens the left. The DNC exists to badger any left of center movement toward their center right position, and even put DNC funds to extremist right winger campaigns boosting Christian nationalist platforms… learning nothing from clintons pied piper failures only pushing us all closer to a fascist hellscape just to say guess we vote blue since we have nowhere else to go. Fuck Jill Stein and all but this is the exact shit that leaves me voting for literally any socialist instead.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          93 months ago

          And the left exists to siphon votes towards the right. See? Unsubstantiated claims work both ways.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              63 months ago

              Because everyone uses their opposition’s lawyers when there’s thousands of other choices. Additionally, everyone refuses to call a war criminal a war criminal when asked- several times.

              It’s only unsubstantiated to people who refuse to accept it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                13 months ago

                She put out an official statement saying Putin is a war criminal. Thats like a reverse uno substantiated claim!

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  7
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  She was grilled over and over again, and side-stepped the question every time. Putting out a statement afterwards is simply her doing damage control. Anyone with any common sense that’s paying attention would have had no problem answering the question when asked.

                  There is no defense for her shilling.

                  NONE.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          I mean I agree with everything you said about democrats, but I don’t view voting as some endorsement of a system or party. I vote for the conditions I want to organize under.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            33 months ago

            Fair enough. Thats why I usually downballot blue too. At best it prevents local rightwingers from gaining momentum and at worst it gives the DNC enough rope to hang themselves with.

            I only see the system changing in two scenarios short of civil war or coup. Either the dnc will lose and all the less privileged libs who wont collaborate with the fash join the fight, creating an actual resistance OR the dems will sweep a super majority and continue to enact right wing policies for the entire term with no excuses, disenfranchising young voters and creating a vacuum for a third party.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Sort of upsetting all your up votes are from people that are happy Nevada “beat” Jill Stein, which is not really the point I think you are making.

      I agree that its shameful behavior from the democrats. I wish they would consider why they’ve lost 2 million people to the Green party rather than try to ban them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      That is a tough call for sure. I’d have to see their down ballot votes before I decide. If they took time out of their day to be a full clown, yeah, at least the person sitting it out didn’t waste any paper while doing nothing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    173 months ago

    I never see positive posts about Kamala because centrist Dems know that there isn’t anything they can post about her that will be actually appealing so their only tactic is to beat up on the anti-war leftist candidate as much and as often as possible

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      353 months ago

      You’re kidding, right? Right now, the front page consists of whatever stupid shit Trump has done recently, downvoted crap pushing Putin’s favorite “anti-war leftist candidate,” and positive news about Kamala Harris and her campaign.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        What positive news about Harris? All I’ve seen is her make statements assuring the population that she’s right of center

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Seriously? I’m actually growing sick of all the positive posts I see about her. I feel like the support is overwhelmingly positive and extensive on here to the point where some people lose touch with reality.

      However, I see you are from a different instance, so it’s entirely possible that we are not seeing the same feed. Cannot see what you are seeing from where I’m standing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    133 months ago

    Do you ant Jill shills understand how corrupt the Democratic party is? Biden straight up supported segregation and Kamala jailed poor children’s parents because they skipped school.

    And there’s countless times Democrats have collaborated with Republicans.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      253 months ago

      Imagine defending Stein’s lack of empathy for the genocide in Ukraine… even just remotely.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          233 months ago

          Yes, it is if you don’t do anything about it.

          ‘hurdur I am voting for a party that never wins. I am sure love helping!’ People have died for less and here you are bitching and crying like a little first world brat because your ego wont let you do what little you can to actually help. Hate the electorial college? The democrats are the only chance you have at switching to the popular vote. But you don’t actually care.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            73 months ago

            No it’s not. Sorry it’s not the responsibility of the most vulnerable to take on power just so you can be comfortable in the middle class. Enjoy Trump all because you were too cowardly to take a stance on genocide.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              113 months ago

              I am not voting for Trump. You are the ones who wont do anything to stop him. If you gave a shit about the vulnerable you would do something to make sure the ‘they are eating the pets’ guy does not get into power. And that is not throwing your vote away to a hopeless party.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              93 months ago

              Sorry it’s not the responsibility of the most vulnerable to take on power

              It is ABSOLUTELY the responsibility of the most vulnerable to take on power.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 months ago

                No, haha they’re the least able and risk the most. Middle class white Americans are the wealthiest people on the planet, why don’t they.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              23 months ago

              Sorry it’s not the responsibility of the most vulnerable to take on power just so you can be comfortable in the middle class.

              In Soc 110, we were taught that’s exactly why there is a middle class: to serve as a buffer between the wealthy and the poor. The middle class is shrinking.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                43 months ago

                There’s a middle class because of settler colonialism and WWII. You get to have a house because a whole continent of land was stolen via genocide. So it’s no surprise Western libs won’t stand against the Gaza genocide since your own wealth is predicted on genocide as well.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  23 months ago

                  Yes. Maybe that’s why even though I voted for Clinton, I still was sympathetic to Antifa and Black Bloc. Cognitive dissonance was loud. And I fervently hope I don’t backslide.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      163 months ago

      Anti Jill Shills?

      Wait… You mean some of you are actually getting paid to publicly point out this flawed candidates’s clear record of failure/inaction, especially dirty funding sources, “interesting” vodka scented dinner parties and clear intentions as a spoiler candidate working purely on behalf of conservatives?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      133 months ago

      Do you Shill Stein supporters know what whataboutism is? It’s 2024. Someone HAD to have explained it to you by now.

    • @brrk
      link
      103 months ago

      Yeah, you’re right, lets just hand over the keys to dictator donnie. Good thinking

    • @LikeTearsInTheRain
      link
      33 months ago

      Is collaborating with another party a bad thing here? Is there a specific type of collaboration you’re referring to? That’s a strange thing to lump in to an argument. This is the kind of partisan bullshit that got us here. A completely dysfunctional system where any cooperation between the two parties is viewed as corruption if not fully aligned with a single party’s interest.

      If the collaboration was to harm the general public, then that’s a different story. But a general statement just adds to the vitriol.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    123 months ago

    Democrats litigate to deny a candidate ballot access, candidate hires non-democrat lawyer to defend herself and democracy.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      263 months ago

      Probably quite a few “non-democrat” lawyers that didn’t storm congress. Weird how she chose one who did and that wasn’t a dealbreaker for her. 🤔

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        83 months ago

        Oh yeah you knew all about this firm and all of its members activities before this story. Theres just so many ballot access consultancy firms specifically fighting against democrats efforts to obstruct democracy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        Are you saying no lawyer should represent a defendant? If those lawyers didn’t represent the defendants, who would? The Constitution mandates that defendants have competent legal representation.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                33 months ago

                Oh. This thread has s lot of comments, it’s hard to keep up. I wonder why no one’s filed a bar complaint? Thanks for the correction. That’s food for thought.